forked from Minki/linux
400e4b2091
'xsave.header::xstate_bv' is a misnomer - what does 'bv' stand for? It probably comes from the 'XGETBV' instruction name, but I could not find in the Intel documentation where that abbreviation comes from. It could mean 'bit vector' - or something else? But how about - instead of guessing about a weird name - we named the field in an obvious and descriptive way that tells us exactly what it does? So rename it to 'xfeatures', which is a bitmask of the xfeatures that are fpstate_active in that context structure. Eyesore like: fpu->state->xsave.xsave_hdr.xstate_bv |= XSTATE_FP; is now much more readable: fpu->state->xsave.header.xfeatures |= XSTATE_FP; Which form is not just infinitely more readable, but is also shorter as well. Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
assigned-dev.c | ||
assigned-dev.h | ||
cpuid.c | ||
cpuid.h | ||
emulate.c | ||
i8254.c | ||
i8254.h | ||
i8259.c | ||
ioapic.c | ||
ioapic.h | ||
iommu.c | ||
irq_comm.c | ||
irq.c | ||
irq.h | ||
Kconfig | ||
kvm_cache_regs.h | ||
lapic.c | ||
lapic.h | ||
Makefile | ||
mmu_audit.c | ||
mmu.c | ||
mmu.h | ||
mmutrace.h | ||
paging_tmpl.h | ||
pmu.c | ||
svm.c | ||
trace.h | ||
tss.h | ||
vmx.c | ||
x86.c | ||
x86.h |