forked from Minki/linux
9de8d68695
RAPL is a per package facility and we already have a mechanism for a dedicated per package reader. So there is no point to have multiple CPUs doing the same. The current implementation actually starts two timers on two CPUs if one does: perf stat -C1,2 -e -e power/energy-pkg .... which makes the whole concept of 1 reader per package moot. What's worse is that the above returns the double of the actual energy consumption, but that's a different problem to address and cannot be solved by removing the pointless per cpuness of that mechanism. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160222221012.845369524@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
alpha | ||
arc | ||
arm | ||
arm64 | ||
avr32 | ||
blackfin | ||
c6x | ||
cris | ||
frv | ||
h8300 | ||
hexagon | ||
ia64 | ||
m32r | ||
m68k | ||
metag | ||
microblaze | ||
mips | ||
mn10300 | ||
nios2 | ||
openrisc | ||
parisc | ||
powerpc | ||
s390 | ||
score | ||
sh | ||
sparc | ||
tile | ||
um | ||
unicore32 | ||
x86 | ||
xtensa | ||
.gitignore | ||
Kconfig |