As of e78c349679 ("time, signal: Protect resource use statistics
with seqlock") cpu_clock_sample_group no longers needs siglock
protection. Unfortunately no one realized it at the time.
Remove the extra locking that is for cpu_clock_sample_group and not
for cpu_clock_sample. This significantly simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/878skmvdts.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org
60f2ceaa81