forked from Minki/linux
564cbc8793
For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in
preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the
former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of
ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't currently harmful.
However, for some features it is necessary to instrument reads and
writes separately, which is not possible with ACCESS_ONCE(). This
distinction is critical to correct operation.
The bulk of the kernel code can be transformed via Coccinelle to use
{READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), though this only modifies users of ACCESS_ONCE(),
and not the implementation itself. As such, it has the potential to
break homebrew ACCESS_ONCE() macros seen in some user code in the kernel
tree (e.g. the virtio code, as fixed in commit
|
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
accounting | ||
arch | ||
build | ||
cgroup | ||
firewire | ||
gpio | ||
hv | ||
iio | ||
include | ||
kvm/kvm_stat | ||
laptop | ||
leds | ||
lib | ||
net | ||
nfsd | ||
objtool | ||
pci | ||
pcmcia | ||
perf | ||
power | ||
scripts | ||
spi | ||
testing | ||
thermal/tmon | ||
time | ||
usb | ||
virtio | ||
vm | ||
Makefile |