forked from Minki/linux
4423028203
Use a memory barrier + store sequence instead of a load + compare and swap sequence to unlock a spinlock and an rw lock. For the spinlock case this saves us two memory reads and a not needed cpu serialization after the compare and swap instruction stored the new value. The kernel size (performance_defconfig) gets reduced by ~14k. Average execution time of a tight inlined spin_unlock loop drops from 5.8ns to 0.7ns on a zEC12 machine. An artificial stress test case where several counters are protected with a single spinlock and which are only incremented while holding the spinlock shows ~30% improvement on a 4 cpu machine. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
asm | ||
uapi/asm |