forked from Minki/linux
42344113ba
Recent probing at the Linux Kernel Memory Model uncovered a 'surprise'. Strongly ordered architectures where the atomic RmW primitive implies full memory ordering and smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic() are a simple barrier() (such as MIPS without WEAK_REORDERING_BEYOND_LLSC) fail for: *x = 1; atomic_inc(u); smp_mb__after_atomic(); r0 = *y; Because, while the atomic_inc() implies memory order, it (surprisingly) does not provide a compiler barrier. This then allows the compiler to re-order like so: atomic_inc(u); *x = 1; smp_mb__after_atomic(); r0 = *y; Which the CPU is then allowed to re-order (under TSO rules) like: atomic_inc(u); r0 = *y; *x = 1; And this very much was not intended. Therefore strengthen the atomic RmW ops to include a compiler barrier. Reported-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
alpha | ||
arc | ||
arm | ||
arm64 | ||
c6x | ||
csky | ||
h8300 | ||
hexagon | ||
ia64 | ||
m68k | ||
microblaze | ||
mips | ||
nds32 | ||
nios2 | ||
openrisc | ||
parisc | ||
powerpc | ||
riscv | ||
s390 | ||
sh | ||
sparc | ||
um | ||
unicore32 | ||
x86 | ||
xtensa | ||
.gitignore | ||
Kconfig |