forked from Minki/linux
2b4b2621fd
This benchmark measures grace period latency and kthread cpu usage of RCU Tasks Trace when many processes are creating/deleting BPF local_storage. Intent here is to quantify improvement on these metrics after Paul's recent RCU Tasks patches [0]. Specifically, fork 15k tasks which call a bpf prog that creates/destroys task local_storage and sleep in a loop, resulting in many call_rcu_tasks_trace calls. To determine grace period latency, trace time elapsed between rcu_tasks_trace_pregp_step and rcu_tasks_trace_postgp; for cpu usage look at rcu_task_trace_kthread's stime in /proc/PID/stat. On my virtualized test environment (Skylake, 8 cpus) benchmark results demonstrate significant improvement: BEFORE Paul's patches: SUMMARY tasks_trace grace period latency avg 22298.551 us stddev 1302.165 us SUMMARY ticks per tasks_trace grace period avg 2.291 stddev 0.324 AFTER Paul's patches: SUMMARY tasks_trace grace period latency avg 16969.197 us stddev 2525.053 us SUMMARY ticks per tasks_trace grace period avg 1.146 stddev 0.178 Note that since these patches are not in bpf-next benchmarking was done by cherry-picking this patch onto rcu tree. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20220620225402.GA3842369@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/ Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220705190018.3239050-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
accounting | ||
arch | ||
bootconfig | ||
bpf | ||
build | ||
certs | ||
cgroup | ||
counter | ||
debugging | ||
edid | ||
firewire | ||
firmware | ||
gpio | ||
hv | ||
iio | ||
include | ||
io_uring | ||
kvm/kvm_stat | ||
laptop | ||
leds | ||
lib | ||
memory-model | ||
objtool | ||
pci | ||
pcmcia | ||
perf | ||
power | ||
rcu | ||
scripts | ||
spi | ||
testing | ||
thermal | ||
time | ||
tracing | ||
usb | ||
virtio | ||
vm | ||
wmi | ||
Makefile |