0652035a57
In theory, compilers should be able to work this out themselves so we can use a simpler version based on the swab() helpers. I have verified that this works on all supported compiler versions (gcc-4.9 and up, clang-10 and up). Looking at the object code produced by gcc-11, I found that the impact is mostly a change in inlining decisions that lead to slightly larger code. In other cases, this version produces explicit byte swaps in place of separate byte access, or comparing against pre-swapped constants. While the source code is clearly simpler, I have not seen an indication of the new version actually producing better code on Arm, so maybe we want to skip this after all. From what I can tell, gcc recognizes the byteswap pattern in the byteshift.h header and can turn it into explicit instructions, but it does not turn a __builtin_bswap32() back into individual bytes when that would result in better output, e.g. when storing a byte-reversed constant. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
acpi | ||
asm-generic | ||
clocksource | ||
crypto | ||
drm | ||
dt-bindings | ||
keys | ||
kunit | ||
kvm | ||
linux | ||
math-emu | ||
media | ||
memory | ||
misc | ||
net | ||
pcmcia | ||
ras | ||
rdma | ||
scsi | ||
soc | ||
sound | ||
target | ||
trace | ||
uapi | ||
vdso | ||
video | ||
xen |