Chris Wilson
03e4e0a9e0
dma-buf/fence: Fix lock inversion within dma-fence-array
Ages ago Rob Clark noted,
"Currently with fence-array, we have a potential deadlock situation. If
we fence_add_callback() on an array-fence, the array-fence's lock is
acquired first, and in it's ->enable_signaling() callback, it will install
cbs on it's array-member fences, so the array-member's lock is acquired
second.
But in the signal path, the array-member's lock is acquired first, and
the array-fence's lock acquired second."
Rob proposed either extensive changes to dma-fence to unnest the
fence-array signaling, or to defer the signaling onto a workqueue. This
is a more refined version of the later, that should keep the latency
of the fence signaling to a minimum by using an irq-work, which is
executed asap.
Reported-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
References: 1476635975-21981-1-git-send-email-robdclark@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171114162719.30958-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2017-11-21 22:37:05 +05:30
..
2017-09-19 22:42:31 +02:00
2017-09-26 07:37:33 -07:00
2017-11-21 14:17:56 +01:00
2017-11-02 12:40:41 +10:00
2017-08-29 10:16:00 +01:00
2017-11-21 22:37:05 +05:30
2017-09-07 12:53:14 -07:00
2017-10-29 22:49:30 +09:00
2017-09-25 11:47:23 -04:00
2017-10-02 22:23:21 -04:00
2017-09-10 20:40:00 -07:00
2017-10-18 12:27:00 +02:00
2017-09-29 11:02:57 +02:00
2017-10-27 19:35:30 -04:00
2017-09-19 09:25:05 -04:00