This patch tests bpf_loop in pyperf and strobemeta, and measures the
verifier performance of replacing the traditional for loop
with bpf_loop.
The results are as follows:
~strobemeta~
Baseline
verification time 6808200 usec
stack depth 496
processed 554252 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 16
total_states 15878 peak_states 13489 mark_read 3110
#192 verif_scale_strobemeta:OK (unrolled loop)
Using bpf_loop
verification time 31589 usec
stack depth 96+400
processed 1513 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 2
total_states 106 peak_states 106 mark_read 60
#193 verif_scale_strobemeta_bpf_loop:OK
~pyperf600~
Baseline
verification time 29702486 usec
stack depth 368
processed 626838 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 7
total_states 30368 peak_states 30279 mark_read 748
#182 verif_scale_pyperf600:OK (unrolled loop)
Using bpf_loop
verification time 148488 usec
stack depth 320+40
processed 10518 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 10
total_states 705 peak_states 517 mark_read 38
#183 verif_scale_pyperf600_bpf_loop:OK
Using the bpf_loop helper led to approximately a 99% decrease
in the verification time and in the number of instructions.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130030622.4131246-4-joannekoong@fb.com
Add selftest that combines two BPF programs within single BPF object
file such that one of the programs is using global variables, but can be
skipped at runtime on old kernels that don't support global data.
Another BPF program is written with the goal to be runnable on very old
kernels and only relies on explicitly accessed BPF maps.
Such test, run against old kernels (e.g., libbpf CI will run it against 4.9
kernel that doesn't support global data), allows to test the approach
and ensure that libbpf doesn't make unnecessary assumption about
necessary kernel features.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211123200105.387855-2-andrii@kernel.org
Add benchmark to measure overhead of uprobes and uretprobes. Also have
a baseline (no uprobe attached) benchmark.
On my dev machine, baseline benchmark can trigger 130M user_target()
invocations. When uprobe is attached, this falls to just 700K. With
uretprobe, we get down to 520K:
$ sudo ./bench trig-uprobe-base -a
Summary: hits 131.289 ± 2.872M/s
# UPROBE
$ sudo ./bench -a trig-uprobe-without-nop
Summary: hits 0.729 ± 0.007M/s
$ sudo ./bench -a trig-uprobe-with-nop
Summary: hits 1.798 ± 0.017M/s
# URETPROBE
$ sudo ./bench -a trig-uretprobe-without-nop
Summary: hits 0.508 ± 0.012M/s
$ sudo ./bench -a trig-uretprobe-with-nop
Summary: hits 0.883 ± 0.008M/s
So there is almost 2.5x performance difference between probing nop vs
non-nop instruction for entry uprobe. And 1.7x difference for uretprobe.
This means that non-nop uprobe overhead is around 1.4 microseconds for uprobe
and 2 microseconds for non-nop uretprobe.
For nop variants, uprobe and uretprobe overhead is down to 0.556 and
1.13 microseconds, respectively.
For comparison, just doing a very low-overhead syscall (with no BPF
programs attached anywhere) gives:
$ sudo ./bench trig-base -a
Summary: hits 4.830 ± 0.036M/s
So uprobes are about 2.67x slower than pure context switch.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211116013041.4072571-1-andrii@kernel.org
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-11-15
We've added 72 non-merge commits during the last 13 day(s) which contain
a total of 171 files changed, 2728 insertions(+), 1143 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add btf_type_tag attributes to bring kernel annotations like __user/__rcu to
BTF such that BPF verifier will be able to detect misuse, from Yonghong Song.
2) Big batch of libbpf improvements including various fixes, future proofing APIs,
and adding a unified, OPTS-based bpf_prog_load() low-level API, from Andrii Nakryiko.
3) Add ingress_ifindex to BPF_SK_LOOKUP program type for selectively applying the
programmable socket lookup logic to packets from a given netdev, from Mark Pashmfouroush.
4) Remove the 128M upper JIT limit for BPF programs on arm64 and add selftest to
ensure exception handling still works, from Russell King and Alan Maguire.
5) Add a new bpf_find_vma() helper for tracing to map an address to the backing
file such as shared library, from Song Liu.
6) Batch of various misc fixes to bpftool, fixing a memory leak in BPF program dump,
updating documentation and bash-completion among others, from Quentin Monnet.
7) Deprecate libbpf bpf_program__get_prog_info_linear() API and migrate its users as
the API is heavily tailored around perf and is non-generic, from Dave Marchevsky.
8) Enable libbpf's strict mode by default in bpftool and add a --legacy option as an
opt-out for more relaxed BPF program requirements, from Stanislav Fomichev.
9) Fix bpftool to use libbpf_get_error() to check for errors, from Hengqi Chen.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (72 commits)
bpftool: Use libbpf_get_error() to check error
bpftool: Fix mixed indentation in documentation
bpftool: Update the lists of names for maps and prog-attach types
bpftool: Fix indent in option lists in the documentation
bpftool: Remove inclusion of utilities.mak from Makefiles
bpftool: Fix memory leak in prog_dump()
selftests/bpf: Fix a tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare compiler warning
selftests/bpf: Fix an unused-but-set-variable compiler warning
bpf: Introduce btf_tracing_ids
bpf: Extend BTF_ID_LIST_GLOBAL with parameter for number of IDs
bpftool: Enable libbpf's strict mode by default
docs/bpf: Update documentation for BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG support
selftests/bpf: Clarify llvm dependency with btf_tag selftest
selftests/bpf: Add a C test for btf_type_tag
selftests/bpf: Rename progs/tag.c to progs/btf_decl_tag.c
selftests/bpf: Test BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG for deduplication
selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG unit tests
selftests/bpf: Test libbpf API function btf__add_type_tag()
bpftool: Support BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG
libbpf: Support BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115162008.25916-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The following is the main btf_type_tag usage in the
C test:
#define __tag1 __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1")))
#define __tag2 __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag2")))
struct btf_type_tag_test {
int __tag1 * __tag1 __tag2 *p;
} g;
The bpftool raw dump with related types:
[4] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
[11] STRUCT 'btf_type_tag_test' size=8 vlen=1
'p' type_id=14 bits_offset=0
[12] TYPE_TAG 'tag1' type_id=16
[13] TYPE_TAG 'tag2' type_id=12
[14] PTR '(anon)' type_id=13
[15] TYPE_TAG 'tag1' type_id=4
[16] PTR '(anon)' type_id=15
[17] VAR 'g' type_id=11, linkage=global
With format C dump, we have
struct btf_type_tag_test {
int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) * __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag2"))) *p;
};
The result C code is identical to the original definition except macro's are gone.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012646.1508231-1-yhs@fb.com
Rename progs/tag.c to progs/btf_decl_tag.c so we can introduce
progs/btf_type_tag.c in the next patch.
Also create a subtest for btf_decl_tag in prog_tests/btf_tag.c
so we can introduce btf_type_tag subtest in the next patch.
I also took opportunity to remove the check whether __has_attribute
is defined or not in progs/btf_decl_tag.c since all recent
clangs should already support this macro.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012641.1507144-1-yhs@fb.com
Exception handling is triggered in BPF tracing programs when a NULL pointer
is dereferenced; the exception handler zeroes the target register and
execution of the BPF program progresses.
To test exception handling then, we need to trigger a NULL pointer dereference
for a field which should never be zero; if it is, the only explanation is the
exception handler ran. task->task_works is the NULL pointer chosen (for a new
task from fork() no work is associated), and the task_works->func field should
not be zero if task_works is non-NULL. The test verifies that task_works and
task_works->func are 0.
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636131046-5982-3-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com
Add tests for bpf_find_vma in perf_event program and kprobe program. The
perf_event program is triggered from NMI context, so the second call of
bpf_find_vma() will return -EBUSY (irq_work busy). The kprobe program,
on the other hand, does not have this constraint.
Also add tests for illegal writes to task or vma from the callback
function. The verifier should reject both cases.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105232330.1936330-3-songliubraving@fb.com
./test_progs-no_alu32 -vv -t twfw
Before the 64-bit_into_32-bit fix:
19: (25) if r1 > 0x3f goto pc+6
R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=63,var_off=(0x0; 0xff),s32_max_value=255,u32_max_value=255)
and eventually:
invalid access to map value, value_size=8 off=7 size=8
R6 max value is outside of the allowed memory range
libbpf: failed to load object 'no_alu32/twfw.o'
After the fix:
19: (25) if r1 > 0x3f goto pc+6
R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=63,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f))
verif_twfw:OK
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101222153.78759-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Previous fix aded bpf_clamp_umax() helper use to re-validate boundaries.
While that works correctly, it introduces more branches, which blows up
past 1 million instructions in no-alu32 variant of strobemeta selftests.
Switching len variable from u32 to u64 also fixes the issue and reduces
the number of validated instructions, so use that instead. Fix this
patch and bpf_clamp_umax() removed, both alu32 and no-alu32 selftests
pass.
Fixes: 0133c20480 ("selftests/bpf: Fix strobemeta selftest regression")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101230118.1273019-1-andrii@kernel.org
Running a BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS prog for dummy_st_ops::test_N()
through bpf_prog_test_run(). Four test cases are added:
(1) attach dummy_st_ops should fail
(2) function return value of bpf_dummy_ops::test_1() is expected
(3) pointer argument of bpf_dummy_ops::test_1() works as expected
(4) multiple arguments passed to bpf_dummy_ops::test_2() are correct
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025064025.2567443-5-houtao1@huawei.com
Also, avoid using CO-RE features, as lskel doesn't support CO-RE, yet.
Include both light and libbpf skeleton in same file to test both of them
together.
In c48e51c8b0 ("bpf: selftests: Add selftests for module kfunc support"),
I added support for generating both lskel and libbpf skel for a BPF
object, however the name parameter for bpftool caused collisions when
included in same file together. This meant that every test needed a
separate file for a libbpf/light skeleton separation instead of
subtests.
Change that by appending a "_lskel" suffix to the name for files using
light skeleton, and convert all existing users.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-7-memxor@gmail.com
This patch adds benchmark tests for the throughput (for lookups + updates)
and the false positive rate of bloom filter lookups, as well as some
minor refactoring of the bash script for running the benchmarks.
These benchmarks show that as the number of hash functions increases,
the throughput and the false positive rate of the bloom filter decreases.
>From the benchmark data, the approximate average false-positive rates
are roughly as follows:
1 hash function = ~30%
2 hash functions = ~15%
3 hash functions = ~5%
4 hash functions = ~2.5%
5 hash functions = ~1%
6 hash functions = ~0.5%
7 hash functions = ~0.35%
8 hash functions = ~0.15%
9 hash functions = ~0.1%
10 hash functions = ~0%
For reference data, the benchmarks run on one thread on a machine
with one numa node for 1 to 5 hash functions for 8-byte and 64-byte
values are as follows:
1 hash function:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 51.1 M/s operations
Updates - 33.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 24.15%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.7 M/s operations
Updates - 15.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 24.2%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 51.0 M/s operations
Updates - 33.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 24.04%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.6 M/s operations
Updates - 14.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 24.06%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 50.5 M/s operations
Updates - 33.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 27.45%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.6 M/s operations
Updates - 14.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 27.42%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 49.7 M/s operations
Updates - 32.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 27.45%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.4 M/s operations
Updates - 13.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 27.58%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 47.2 M/s operations
Updates - 31.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 30.94%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.3 M/s operations
Updates - 13.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 30.95%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 41.1 M/s operations
Updates - 28.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 31.01%
64-byte value
Lookups - 13.3 M/s operations
Updates - 11.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 30.98%
2 hash functions:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 34.1 M/s operations
Updates - 20.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 9.13%
64-byte value
Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations
Updates - 7.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 9.21%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 33.7 M/s operations
Updates - 18.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 9.13%
64-byte value
Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations
Updates - 7.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 9.19%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 32.7 M/s operations
Updates - 18.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 12.61%
64-byte value
Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations
Updates - 7.5 M/s operations
False positive rate: 12.61%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 30.6 M/s operations
Updates - 18.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 12.54%
64-byte value
Lookups - 8.0 M/s operations
Updates - 7.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 12.52%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 25.3 M/s operations
Updates - 16.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 16.77%
64-byte value
Lookups - 7.9 M/s operations
Updates - 6.5 M/s operations
False positive rate: 16.88%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 20.8 M/s operations
Updates - 14.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 16.78%
64-byte value
Lookups - 7.0 M/s operations
Updates - 6.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 16.78%
3 hash functions:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 25.1 M/s operations
Updates - 14.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 7.65%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.8 M/s operations
Updates - 5.5 M/s operations
False positive rate: 7.58%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 24.7 M/s operations
Updates - 14.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 7.71%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.8 M/s operations
Updates - 5.3 M/s operations
False positive rate: 7.62%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 22.9 M/s operations
Updates - 13.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.62%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.6 M/s operations
Updates - 4.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.7%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 19.8 M/s operations
Updates - 12.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.60%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.3 M/s operations
Updates - 4.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.69%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 16.2 M/s operations
Updates - 10.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 4.49%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.9 M/s operations
Updates - 4.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 4.41%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 18.8 M/s operations
Updates - 9.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 4.45%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.2 M/s operations
Updates - 3.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 4.54%
4 hash functions:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 19.7 M/s operations
Updates - 11.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.01%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.4 M/s operations
Updates - 4.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.00%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 19.5 M/s operations
Updates - 10.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.00%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.3 M/s operations
Updates - 3.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.97%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 18.2 M/s operations
Updates - 10.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.05%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.3 M/s operations
Updates - 3.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.05%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 15.5 M/s operations
Updates - 9.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.99%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.0 M/s operations
Updates - 3.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.99%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 13.8 M/s operations
Updates - 7.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 3.91%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.7 M/s operations
Updates - 3.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 3.78%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 13.0 M/s operations
Updates - 6.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 3.93%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations
Updates - 3.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 3.39%
5 hash functions:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 16.4 M/s operations
Updates - 9.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.78%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations
Updates - 3.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.77%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 16.3 M/s operations
Updates - 9.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.79%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations
Updates - 3.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.78%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 15.1 M/s operations
Updates - 8.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.82%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.4 M/s operations
Updates - 3.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.78%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 13.2 M/s operations
Updates - 7.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.81%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations
Updates - 2.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.80%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 10.5 M/s operations
Updates - 5.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.29%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations
Updates - 2.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.28%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 9.6 M/s operations
Updates - 5.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.30%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations
Updates - 2.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.30%
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-5-joannekoong@fb.com
This patch adds test cases for bpf bloom filter maps. They include tests
checking against invalid operations by userspace, tests for using the
bloom filter map as an inner map, and a bpf program that queries the
bloom filter map for values added by a userspace program.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-4-joannekoong@fb.com
Recent change to use tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep for perf_buffer
selftests causes this selftest to fail on 4.9 kernel in libbpf CI ([0]):
libbpf: prog 'handle_sys_enter': failed to attach to perf_event FD 6: Invalid argument
libbpf: prog 'handle_sys_enter': failed to attach to tracepoint 'syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep': Invalid argument
It's not exactly clear why, because perf_event itself is created for
this tracepoint, but I can't even compile 4.9 kernel locally, so it's
hard to figure this out. If anyone has better luck and would like to
help investigating this, I'd really appreciate this.
For now, unblock CI by switching back to raw_syscalls/sys_enter, but reduce
amount of unnecessary samples emitted by filter by process ID. Use
explicit ARRAY map for that to make it work on 4.9 as well, because
global data isn't yet supported there.
Fixes: aa274f98b2 ("selftests/bpf: Fix possible/online index mismatch in perf_buffer test")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022201342.3490692-1-andrii@kernel.org
Patch set [1] introduced BTF_KIND_TAG to allow tagging
declarations for struct/union, struct/union field, var, func
and func arguments and these tags will be encoded into
dwarf. They are also encoded to btf by llvm for the bpf target.
After BTF_KIND_TAG is introduced, we intended to use it
for kernel __user attributes. But kernel __user is actually
a type attribute. Upstream and internal discussion showed
it is not a good idea to mix declaration attribute and
type attribute. So we proposed to introduce btf_type_tag
as a type attribute and existing btf_tag renamed to
btf_decl_tag ([2]).
This patch renamed BTF_KIND_TAG to BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG and some
other declarations with *_tag to *_decl_tag to make it clear
the tag is for declaration. In the future, BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG
might be introduced per [3].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914223004.244411-1-yhs@fb.com/
[2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D111588
[3] https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199
Fixes: b5ea834dde ("bpf: Support for new btf kind BTF_KIND_TAG")
Fixes: 5b84bd1036 ("libbpf: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG")
Fixes: 5c07f2fec0 ("bpftool: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012164838.3345699-1-yhs@fb.com
Currently the recursion test is hooking __htab_map_lookup_elem
function, which is invoked both from bpf_prog and bpf syscall.
But in our kernel build, the __htab_map_lookup_elem gets inlined
within the htab_map_lookup_elem, so it's not trigered and the
test fails.
Fixing this by using htab_map_delete_elem, which is not inlined
for bpf_prog calls (like htab_map_lookup_elem is) and is used
directly as pointer for map_delete_elem, so it won't disappear
by inlining.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/YVnfFTL/3T6jOwHI@krava
This adds selftests that tests the success and failure path for modules
kfuncs (in presence of invalid kfunc calls) for both libbpf and
gen_loader. It also adds a prog_test kfunc_btf_id_list so that we can
add module BTF ID set from bpf_testmod.
This also introduces a couple of test cases to verifier selftests for
validating whether we get an error or not depending on if invalid kfunc
call remains after elimination of unreachable instructions.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211002011757.311265-10-memxor@gmail.com
clang build kernel failed the selftest probe_user.
$ ./test_progs -t probe_user
$ ...
$ test_probe_user:PASS:get_kprobe_res 0 nsec
$ test_probe_user:FAIL:check_kprobe_res wrong kprobe res from probe read: 0.0.0.0:0
$ #94 probe_user:FAIL
The test attached to kernel function __sys_connect(). In net/socket.c, we have
int __sys_connect(int fd, struct sockaddr __user *uservaddr, int addrlen)
{
......
}
...
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(connect, int, fd, struct sockaddr __user *, uservaddr,
int, addrlen)
{
return __sys_connect(fd, uservaddr, addrlen);
}
The gcc compiler (8.5.0) does not inline __sys_connect() in syscall entry
function. But latest clang trunk did the inlining. So the bpf program
is not triggered.
To make the test more reliable, let us kprobe the syscall entry function
instead. Note that x86_64, arm64 and s390 have syscall wrappers and they have
to be handled specially.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210929033000.3711921-1-yhs@fb.com
Update "sk_lookup/" definition to be a stand-alone type specifier,
with backwards-compatible prefix match logic in non-libbpf-1.0 mode.
Currently in selftests all the "sk_lookup/<whatever>" uses just use
<whatever> for duplicated unique name encoding, which is redundant as
BPF program's name (C function name) uniquely and descriptively
identifies the intended use for such BPF programs.
With libbpf's SEC_DEF("sk_lookup") definition updated, switch existing
sk_lookup programs to use "unqualified" SEC("sk_lookup") section names,
with no random text after it.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-11-andrii@kernel.org
Convert all SEC("classifier*") uses to a new and strict SEC("tc")
section name. In reference_tracking selftests switch from ambiguous
searching by program title (section name) to non-ambiguous searching by
name in some selftests, getting closer to completely removing
bpf_object__find_program_by_title().
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-4-andrii@kernel.org
Convert almost all SEC("xdp_blah") uses to strict SEC("xdp") to comply
with strict libbpf 1.0 logic of exact section name match for XDP program
types. There is only one exception, which is only tested through
iproute2 and defines multiple XDP programs within the same BPF object.
Given iproute2 still works in non-strict libbpf mode and it doesn't have
means to specify XDP programs by its name (not section name/title),
leave that single file alone for now until iproute2 gains lookup by
function/program name.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-3-andrii@kernel.org
This commit adds a test prog for vprintk which confirms that:
* bpf_trace_vprintk is writing to /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe
* __bpf_vprintk macro works as expected
* >3 args are printed
* bpf_printk w/ 0 format args compiles
* bpf_trace_vprintk call w/ a fmt specifier but NULL fmt data fails
Approach and code are borrowed from trace_printk test.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210917182911.2426606-9-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-09-17
We've added 63 non-merge commits during the last 12 day(s) which contain
a total of 65 files changed, 2653 insertions(+), 751 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Streamline internal BPF program sections handling and
bpf_program__set_attach_target() in libbpf, from Andrii.
2) Add support for new btf kind BTF_KIND_TAG, from Yonghong.
3) Introduce bpf_get_branch_snapshot() to capture LBR, from Song.
4) IMUL optimization for x86-64 JIT, from Jie.
5) xsk selftest improvements, from Magnus.
6) Introduce legacy kprobe events support in libbpf, from Rafael.
7) Access hw timestamp through BPF's __sk_buff, from Vadim.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (63 commits)
selftests/bpf: Fix a few compiler warnings
libbpf: Constify all high-level program attach APIs
libbpf: Schedule open_opts.attach_prog_fd deprecation since v0.7
selftests/bpf: Switch fexit_bpf2bpf selftest to set_attach_target() API
libbpf: Allow skipping attach_func_name in bpf_program__set_attach_target()
libbpf: Deprecated bpf_object_open_opts.relaxed_core_relocs
selftests/bpf: Stop using relaxed_core_relocs which has no effect
libbpf: Use pre-setup sec_def in libbpf_find_attach_btf_id()
bpf: Update bpf_get_smp_processor_id() documentation
libbpf: Add sphinx code documentation comments
selftests/bpf: Skip btf_tag test if btf_tag attribute not supported
docs/bpf: Add documentation for BTF_KIND_TAG
selftests/bpf: Add a test with a bpf program with btf_tag attributes
selftests/bpf: Test BTF_KIND_TAG for deduplication
selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_TAG unit tests
selftests/bpf: Change NAME_NTH/IS_NAME_NTH for BTF_KIND_TAG format
selftests/bpf: Test libbpf API function btf__add_tag()
bpftool: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG
libbpf: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG
libbpf: Rename btf_{hash,equal}_int to btf_{hash,equal}_int_tag
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210917173738.3397064-1-ast@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Commit c240ba2878 ("selftests/bpf: Add a test with a bpf
program with btf_tag attributes") added btf_tag selftest
to test BTF_KIND_TAG generation from C source code, and to
test kernel validation of generated BTF types.
But if an old clang (clang 13 or earlier) is used, the
following compiler warning may be seen:
progs/tag.c:23:20: warning: unknown attribute 'btf_tag' ignored
and the test itself is marked OK. The compiler warning is bad
and the test itself shouldn't be marked OK.
This patch added the check for btf_tag attribute support.
If btf_tag is not supported by the clang, the attribute will
not be used in the code and the test will be marked as skipped.
For example, with clang 13:
./test_progs -t btf_tag
#21 btf_tag:SKIP
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
The selftests/README.rst is updated to clarify when the btf_tag
test may be skipped.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210915061036.2577971-1-yhs@fb.com
Add a bpf program with btf_tag attributes. The program is
loaded successfully with the kernel. With the command
bpftool btf dump file ./tag.o
the following dump shows that tags are properly encoded:
[8] STRUCT 'key_t' size=12 vlen=3
'a' type_id=2 bits_offset=0
'b' type_id=2 bits_offset=32
'c' type_id=2 bits_offset=64
[9] TAG 'tag1' type_id=8 component_id=-1
[10] TAG 'tag2' type_id=8 component_id=-1
[11] TAG 'tag1' type_id=8 component_id=1
[12] TAG 'tag2' type_id=8 component_id=1
...
[21] FUNC_PROTO '(anon)' ret_type_id=2 vlen=1
'x' type_id=2
[22] FUNC 'foo' type_id=21 linkage=static
[23] TAG 'tag1' type_id=22 component_id=0
[24] TAG 'tag2' type_id=22 component_id=0
[25] TAG 'tag1' type_id=22 component_id=-1
[26] TAG 'tag2' type_id=22 component_id=-1
...
[29] VAR 'total' type_id=27, linkage=global
[30] TAG 'tag1' type_id=29 component_id=-1
[31] TAG 'tag2' type_id=29 component_id=-1
If an old clang compiler, which does not support btf_tag attribute,
is used, these btf_tag attributes will be silently ignored.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914223058.248949-1-yhs@fb.com
Minimal selftest which implements a small BPF policy program to the
connect(2) hook which rejects TCP connection requests to port 60123
with EPERM. This is being attached to a non-root cgroup v2 path. The
test asserts that this works under cgroup v2-only and under a mixed
cgroup v1/v2 environment where net_classid is set in the former case.
Before fix:
# ./test_progs -t cgroup_v1v2
test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:server_fd 0 nsec
test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:client_fd 0 nsec
test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:cgroup_fd 0 nsec
test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:server_fd 0 nsec
run_test:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
run_test:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec
test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:cgroup-v2-only 0 nsec
run_test:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
run_test:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec
run_test:PASS:join_classid 0 nsec
(network_helpers.c:219: errno: None) Unexpected success to connect to server
test_cgroup_v1v2:FAIL:cgroup-v1v2 unexpected error: -1 (errno 0)
#27 cgroup_v1v2:FAIL
Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
After fix:
# ./test_progs -t cgroup_v1v2
#27 cgroup_v1v2:OK
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210913230759.2313-3-daniel@iogearbox.net
