Add a short description of what we expect from GuC and some minor
improvements to existing documentation. Also remove a comment about a
difference between GuC and HuC that is not true anymore.
v2: add that the GuC is not mandatory (Martin)
v3: add extra newline for better text organization (Martin)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Anna Karas <anna.karas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191014183602.3643-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Let's wait with decision about importance of uC failure to
hardware initialization step.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190817131144.26884-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Be consistent and always perform fw fetch cleanup in GuC/HuC specific
init functions on every failure. Also while converting firmware
status to error, stop treating SELECTED as non-error, as long term
we should not see it.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190817131144.26884-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Include 2019 in copyright years and start using SPDX tag.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190812092935.21048-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
No need to use intel_uc_supports_guc_submission(uc) as we
can directly use intel_guc_is_submission_supported(guc)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190804195052.31140-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
The shrinker cannot touch objects used by the contexts (logical state
and ring). Currently we mark those as "pin_global" to let the shrinker
skip over them, however, if we remove them from the shrinker lists
entirely, we don't event have to include them in our shrink accounting.
By keeping the unshrinkable objects in our shrinker tracking, we report
a large number of objects available to be shrunk, and leave the shrinker
deeply unsatisfied when we fail to reclaim those. The shrinker will
persist in trying to reclaim the unavailable objects, forcing the system
into a livelock (not even hitting the dread oomkiller).
v2: Extend unshrinkable protection for perma-pinned scratch and guc
allocations (Tvrtko)
v3: Notice that we should be pinned when marking unshrinkable and so the
link cannot be empty; merge duplicate paths.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802212137.22207-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Instead of relying on enable_guc modparam to represent actual
GuC submission mode, use dedicated flag and look at modparam
only to check if submission was explicitly disabled by the user.
v2: rebased, simplified condition (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731223321.36436-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Rename intel_uc_is_using* into intel_uc_supports* to make clear
distinction from actual state (compare intel_uc_fw_is_running)
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731223321.36436-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
guc->stage_desc_pool is required as part of the init parameters and
there is no reason we have to init them after HuC. This fixes a NULL
ptr dereference due to guc->stage_desc_pool not being set (no fixes
tag since GuC submission can't be enabled yet).
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725174655.24382-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
All the GuC objects are perma-pinned, so their offset can't change at
runtime. We can therefore set (and log!) the parameters only once during
boot.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190724085849.18047-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Get rid of them to avoid more users being added while the guc code
transitions to use gt more than i915.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
With our HW interface logic moving from i915 to gt and with GuC and HuC
being part of the gt HW, it makes sense to use the intel_gt structure
instead of i915 as our reference object in GuC/HuC paths.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Both microcontrollers are part of the GT HW and are closely related to
GT operations. To keep all the files cleanly together, they've been
placed in their own subdir inside the gt/ folder
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
