Fix __wait_on_atomic_t() so that it calls the action func if the counter != 0
rather than if the counter is 0 so as to be analogous to __wait_on_bit().
Thanks to Yacine who found this by visual inspection.
This will affect FS-Cache in that it will could fail to sleep correctly when
trying to clean up after a netfs cookie is withdrawn.
Reported-by: Yacine Belkadi <yacine.belkadi.1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
cc: Milosz Tanski <milosz@adfin.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Add wait_on_atomic_t() and wake_up_atomic_t() to indicate became-zero events on
atomic_t types. This uses the bit-wake waitqueue table. The key is set to a
value outside of the number of bits in a long so that wait_on_bit() won't be
woken up accidentally.
What I'm using this for is: in a following patch I add a counter to struct
fscache_cookie to count the number of outstanding operations that need access
to netfs data. The way this works is:
(1) When a cookie is allocated, the counter is initialised to 1.
(2) When an operation wants to access netfs data, it calls atomic_inc_unless()
to increment the counter before it does so. If it was 0, then the counter
isn't incremented, the operation isn't permitted to access the netfs data
(which might by this point no longer exist) and the operation aborts in
some appropriate manner.
(3) When an operation finishes with the netfs data, it decrements the counter
and if it reaches 0, calls wake_up_atomic_t() on it - the assumption being
that it was the last blocker.
(4) When a cookie is released, the counter is decremented and the releaser
uses wait_on_atomic_t() to wait for the counter to become 0 - which should
indicate no one is using the netfs data any longer. The netfs data can
then be destroyed.
There are some alternatives that I have thought of and that have been suggested
by Tejun Heo:
(A) Using wait_on_bit() to wait on a bit in the counter. This doesn't work
because if that bit happens to be 0 then the wait won't happen - even if
the counter is non-zero.
(B) Using wait_on_bit() to wait on a flag elsewhere which is cleared when the
counter reaches 0. Such a flag would be redundant and would add
complexity.
(C) Adding a waitqueue to fscache_cookie - this would expand that struct by
several words for an event that happens just once in each cookie's
lifetime. Further, cookies are generally per-file so there are likely to
be a lot of them.
(D) Similar to (C), but add a pointer to a waitqueue in the cookie instead of
a waitqueue. This would add single word per cookie and so would be less
of an expansion - but still an expansion.
(E) Adding a static waitqueue to the fscache module. Generally this would be
fine, but under certain circumstances many cookies will all get added at
the same time (eg. NFS umount, cache withdrawal) thereby presenting
scaling issues. Note that the wait may be significant as disk I/O may be
in progress.
So, I think reusing the wait_on_bit() waitqueue set is reasonable. I don't
make much use of the waitqueue I need on a per-cookie basis, but sometimes I
have a huge flood of the cookies to deal with.
I also don't want to add a whole new set of global waitqueue tables
specifically for the dec-to-0 event if I can reuse the bit tables.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Tested-By: Milosz Tanski <milosz@adfin.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
I've legally changed my name with New York State, the US Social Security
Administration, et al. This patch propagates the name change and change
in initials and login to comments in the kernel source as well.
Signed-off-by: Nadia Yvette Chambers <nyc@holomorphy.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-> #2 (&tty->write_wait){-.-...}:
is a lot more informative than:
-> #2 (key#19){-.....}:
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-8zpopbny51023rdb0qq67eye@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The changed files were only including linux/module.h for the
EXPORT_SYMBOL infrastructure, and nothing else. Revector them
onto the isolated export header for faster compile times.
Nothing to see here but a whole lot of instances of:
-#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
This commit is only changing the kernel dir; next targets
will probably be mm, fs, the arch dirs, etc.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Add more wait, wake, and completion interfaces to the device-drivers
docbook.
Fix kernel-doc notation in the added files.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Give waitqueue spinlocks their own lockdep classes when they
are initialised from init_waitqueue_head(). This means that
struct wait_queue::func functions can operate other waitqueues.
This is used by CacheFiles to catch the page from a backing fs
being unlocked and to wake up another thread to take a copy of
it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
LKML-Reference: <20090810113305.17284.81508.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
'777c6c5 wait: prevent exclusive waiter starvation' made
__wake_up_common() global to be used from abort_exclusive_wait().
It was needed to do a wake-up with the waitqueue lock held while
passing down a key to the wake-up function.
Since '4ede816 epoll keyed wakeups: add __wake_up_locked_key() and
__wake_up_sync_key()' there is an appropriate wrapper for this case:
__wake_up_locked_key().
Use it here and make __wake_up_common() private to the scheduler
again.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1239720785-19661-1-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
With exclusive waiters, every process woken up through the wait queue must
ensure that the next waiter down the line is woken when it has finished.
Interruptible waiters don't do that when aborting due to a signal. And if
an aborting waiter is concurrently woken up through the waitqueue, noone
will ever wake up the next waiter.
This has been observed with __wait_on_bit_lock() used by
lock_page_killable(): the first contender on the queue was aborting when
the actual lock holder woke it up concurrently. The aborted contender
didn't acquire the lock and therefor never did an unlock followed by
waking up the next waiter.
Add abort_exclusive_wait() which removes the process' wait descriptor from
the waitqueue, iff still queued, or wakes up the next waiter otherwise.
It does so under the waitqueue lock. Racing with a wake up means the
aborting process is either already woken (removed from the queue) and will
wake up the next waiter, or it will remove itself from the queue and the
concurrent wake up will apply to the next waiter after it.
Use abort_exclusive_wait() in __wait_event_interruptible_exclusive() and
__wait_on_bit_lock() when they were interrupted by other means than a wake
up through the queue.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Reported-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Mentored-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> ["after some testing"]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
is_sync_wait() is used to distinguish between sync and async waits.
Basically sync waits are the ones initialized with init_waitqueue_entry()
and async ones with init_waitqueue_func_entry(). The sync/async
distinction is used only in prepare_to_wait[_exclusive]() and its only
function is to skip setting the current task state if the wait is async.
This has a few problems.
* No one uses it. None of func_entry users use prepare_to_wait()
functions, so the code path never gets executed.
* The distinction is bogus. Maybe back when func_entry is used only
by aio but it's now also used by epoll and in future possibly by 9p
and poll/select.
* Taking @state as argument and ignoring it silenly depending on how
@wait is initialized is just a bad error-prone API.
* It prevents func_entry waits from using wait->private for no good
reason.
This patch kills is_sync_wait() and the associated code paths from
prepare_to_wait[_exclusive](). As there was no user of these code paths,
this patch doesn't cause any behavior difference.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
allyesconfig vmlinux size delta:
text data bss dec filename
20736884 6073834 3075176 29885894 vmlinux.before
20721009 6073966 3075176 29870151 vmlinux.after
~18 bytes per callsite, 15K of text size (~0.1%) saved.
(as an added bonus this also removes a lockdep annotation.)
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Create one lock class for all waitqueue locks in the kernel. Has no effect on
non-lockdep kernels.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
