Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Daniel Vetter
5c323b2a78 drm/i915: spelling fixes for frontbuffer tracking kerneldoc
Oh well.

v2: Fix one more spelling fail Paulo spotted.

Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-10-01 10:52:57 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
11c9b6c628 drm/i915: Tighting frontbuffer tracking around flips
So I think I've spotted a small gap in the frontbuffer tracking
while discussing the logic with Paulo on irc:

1. Userspace schedules gpu rendering to the current frontbuffer.
This gets tracked in dev_priv->fb_tracking.busy_bits.

2. We pageflip a fully rendered buffer before the frontbuffer
rendering completes.

3. The request retiring will never clear busy_bits (since at retire
time the old frontbuffer won't have obj->frontbuffer_bits set), so
these bits now are stuck until someone again does a bit of frontbuffer
tracking.

If we clear stale busy_bits in flip_prepare this gap is closed.

Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-10-01 10:52:56 +02:00
Rodrigo Vivi
1d73c2a8f2 drm/i915: Minimize the huge amount of unecessary fbc sw cache clean.
The sw cache clean on BDW is a tempoorary workaround because we cannot
set cache clean on blt ring with risk of hungs. So we are doing the cache clean on sw.
However we are doing much more than needed. Not only when using blt ring.
So, with this extra w/a we minimize the ammount of cache cleans and call it only
on same cases that it was being called on gen7.

The traditional FBC Cache clean happens over LRI on BLT ring when there is a
frontbuffer touch happening. frontbuffer tracking set fbc_dirty variable
to let BLT flush that it must clean FBC cache.

fbc.need_sw_cache_clean works in the opposite information direction
of ring->fbc_dirty telling software on frontbuffer tracking to perform
the cache clean on sw side.

v2: Clean it a little bit and fully check for Broadwell instead of gen8.

v3: Rebase after frontbuffer organization.

v4: Wiggle confused me. So fixing v3!

Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-09-29 14:17:31 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
b680c37a4d drm/i915: DocBook integration for frontbuffer tracking
I shouldn't ask everyone to do this and fail myself ...

This extracts all the frontbuffer tracking functions into
intel_frontbuffer.c, adds a DOC overview section and also adds the
missing kerneldoc for i915_gem_track_fb and also pulls it into the
same section for convenience.

v2: Don't forget about the header files.

v3: Oops, might check compilation next time around. To make my life
easier drop the increase_pllclock from set_base_atomic since really,
it doesn't matter if you see your Oops or kgdb with a tiny bit of lag.

v4: Try to better explain how to actually use this, requested by Paulo
on irc.

v5: Explain invalidate/flush a bit clearer.

v6: s/business/busyness/

Acked-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
2014-09-19 19:46:49 +02:00