FL_CLOSE is quite common when you close a file on which you hold a
lock. The spurious "Unknown lock flags" message in cFYI is
confusing in this case.
Reported-by: Alexander Bokovoy <abokovoy@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Now we walk though cifsFileInfo's list for every incoming lease
break and look for an equivalent there. That approach misses lease
breaks that come just after an open response - we don't have time
to populate new cifsFileInfo structure to the list. Fix this by
adding new list of pending opens and look for a lease there if we
didn't find it in the list of cifsFileInfo structures.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
When we have a file opened with read oplock and we are writing a data
to this file, we need to store the data in the cache and then send to
the server to ensure that the next read operation will get a coherent
data.
Also mark it as CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2 because it's more suitable for SMB2
code but can fix some CIFS problems too (when server delays sending
an oplock break after a write request). We can drop this ifdefs
dependence in future.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Currently CIFS code accept read/write ops on mandatory locked area
when two processes use the same file descriptor - it's wrong.
Fix this by serializing io and brlock operations on the inode.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
and allow several processes to walk through the lock list and read
can_cache_brlcks value if they are not going to modify them.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Now we need to lock/unlock a spinlock while processing brlock ops
on the inode. Move brlocks of a fid to a separate list and attach
all such lists to the inode. This let us not hold a spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Replace the "marshal_iov" function with a "read_into_pages" function.
That function will copy the read data off the socket and into the
pages array, kmapping and reading pages one at a time.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
We'll need an array to put into a smb_rqst, so convert this into an array
instead of (ab)using the lru list_head.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Eventually, we're going to want to append a list of pages to
cifs_readdata instead of a list of kvecs. To prepare for that, turn
the kvec array allocation into a separate one and just keep a
pointer to it in the readdata.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
This is help us to extend the code for future protocols that can use
another fid mechanism (as SMB2 that has it divided into two parts:
persistent and violatile).
Also rename variables and refactor the code around the changes.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
The readpages bug is a regression that was introduced in 6993f74a5.
This also fixes a couple of similar bugs in the uncached read and write
codepaths.
Also, prevent this sort of thing in the future by having cifsFileInfo_get
take the spinlock itself, and adding a _locked variant for use in places
that are already holding the lock. The _put code has always done that
so this makes for a less confusing interface.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.5.x
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Since both CIFS and SMB2 use ses->capabilities (server->capabilities)
field but flags are different we should make such checks protocol
independent.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
struct file_lock is pretty large, so we really don't want that on the
stack in a potentially long call chain. Reorganize the arguments to
CIFSSMBPosixLock to eliminate the need for that.
Eliminate the get_flag and simply use a non-NULL pLockInfo to indicate
that this is a "get" operation. In order to do that, need to add a new
loff_t argument for the start_offset.
Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Those macros add a newline on their own, so there's not any need to
embed one in the message itself.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
when cifs_reconnect sets maxBuf to 0 and we try to calculate a size
of memory we need to store locks.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
While traversing the linked list of open file handles, if the identfied
file handle is invalid, a reopen is attempted and if it fails, we
resume traversing where we stopped and cifs can oops while accessing
invalid next element, for list might have changed.
So mark the invalid file handle and attempt reopen if no
valid file handle is found in rest of the list.
If reopen fails, move the invalid file handle to the end of the list
and start traversing the list again from the begining.
Repeat this four times before giving up and returning an error if
file reopen keeps failing.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
CIFS brlock cache can be used by several file handles if we have a
write-caching lease on the file that is supported by SMB2 protocol.
Prepate the code to handle this situation correctly by sorting brlocks
by a fid to easily push them in portions when lease break comes.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Convert cifs_iovec_read to use async I/O. This also raises the limit on
the rsize for uncached reads. We first allocate a set of pages to hold
the replies, then issue the reads in parallel and then collect the
replies and copy the results into the iovec.
A possible future optimization would be to kmap and inline the iovec
buffers and read the data directly from the socket into that. That would
require some rather complex conversion of the iovec into a kvec however.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
This isn't strictly necessary for the async readpages code, but the
uncached version will need to be able to collect the replies after
issuing the calls. Add a kref to cifs_readdata and use change the
code to take and put references appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cached and uncached reads will need to do different things here to
handle the difference when the pages are in pagecache and not. Abstract
out the function that marshals the page list into a kvec array.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
We'll need different completion routines for an uncached read. Allow
the caller to set the one he needs at allocation time. Also, move
most of these functions to file.c so we can make more of them static.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
In the recent update of the cifs_iovec_write code to use async writes,
the handling of the file position was broken. That patch added a local
"offset" variable to handle the offset, and then only updated the
original "*poffset" before exiting.
Unfortunately, it copied off the original offset from the beginning,
instead of doing so after generic_write_checks had been called. Fix
this by moving the initialization of "offset" after that in the
function.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
We can deadlock if we have a write oplock and two processes
use the same file handle. In this case the first process can't
unlock its lock if the second process blocked on the lock in the
same time.
Fix it by using posix_lock_file rather than posix_lock_file_wait
under cinode->lock_mutex. If we request a blocking lock and
posix_lock_file indicates that there is another lock that prevents
us, wait untill that lock is released and restart our call.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
We can deadlock if we have a write oplock and two processes
use the same file handle. In this case the first process can't
unlock its lock if another process blocked on the lock in the
same time.
Fix this by removing lock_mutex protection from waiting on a
blocked lock and protect only posix_lock_file call.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
