Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lorenzo Pieralisi
72407514c9 ARM64: PCI: do not enable resources on PROBE_ONLY systems
On ARM64 PROBE_ONLY PCI systems resources are not currently claimed,
therefore they can't be enabled since they do not have a valid
parent pointer; this in turn prevents enabling PCI devices on
ARM64 PROBE_ONLY systems, causing PCI devices initialization to
fail.

To solve this issue, resources must be claimed when devices are
added on PROBE_ONLY systems, which ensures that the resource hierarchy
is validated and the resource tree is sane, but this requires changes
in the ARM64 resource management that can affect adversely existing
PCI set-ups (claiming resources on !PROBE_ONLY systems might break
existing ARM64 PCI platform implementations).

As a temporary solution in preparation for a proper resources claiming
implementation in ARM64 core, to enable PCI PROBE_ONLY systems on ARM64,
this patch adds a pcibios_enable_device() arch implementation that
simply prevents enabling resources on PROBE_ONLY systems (mirroring ARM
behaviour).

This is always a safe thing to do because on PROBE_ONLY systems the
configuration space set-up can be considered immutable, and it is in
preparation of proper resource claiming that would finally validate
the PCI resources tree in the ARM64 arch implementation on PROBE_ONLY
systems.

For !PROBE_ONLY systems resources enablement in pcibios_enable_device()
on ARM64 is implemented as in current PCI core, leaving the behaviour
unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-07-30 20:17:07 +01:00
Hanjun Guo
a9cb97fe71 ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce PCI stub functions for ACPI
CONFIG_ACPI depends CONFIG_PCI on x86 and ia64, in ARM64 server
world we will have PCIe in most cases, but some of them may not,
make CONFIG_ACPI depend CONFIG_PCI on ARM64 will satisfy both.

With that case, we need some arch dependent PCI functions to
access the config space before the PCI root bridge is created, and
pci_acpi_scan_root() to create the PCI root bus. So introduce
some stub function here to make ACPI core compile and revisit
them later when implemented on ARM64.

CC: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Tested-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-03-25 11:49:31 +00:00
Lorenzo Pieralisi
7c67470009 PCI: Move domain assignment from arm64 to generic code
The current logic in arm64 pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() is flawed in that
depending on the host controller configuration for a platform and the
initialization sequence, core code may end up allocating PCI domain numbers
from both DT and the generic domain counter, which would result in PCI
domain allocation aliases/errors.

Fix the logic behind the PCI domain number assignment and move the
resulting code to the PCI core so the same domain allocation logic is used
on all platforms that select CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC.

[bhelgaas: tidy changelog]
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-12-27 18:19:12 -07:00
Liviu Dudau
d1e6dc91b5 arm64: Add architectural support for PCI
Use the generic PCI domain and OF functions to provide support for PCI
on arm64.

[bhelgaas: Change comments to use generic PCI, not just PCIe.  Nothing at
this level is PCIe-specific.]
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-30 17:08:57 -06:00