When a DATA packet has its initial transmission, we may need to start or
adjust the resend timer. Without this we end up relying on being sent a
NACK to initiate the resend.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
before_eq() and friends should be used to compare serial numbers (when not
checking for (non)equality) rather than casting to int, subtracting and
checking the result.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Don't send an IDLE ACK at the end of the transmission of the response to a
service call. The service end resends DATA packets until the client sends an
ACK that hard-acks all the send data. At that point, the call is complete.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Set the timestamp on sk_buffs holding packets to be transmitted before
queueing them because the moment the packet is on the queue it can be seen
by the retransmission algorithm - which may see a completely random
timestamp.
If the retransmission algorithm sees such a timestamp, it may retransmit
the packet and, in future, tell the congestion management algorithm that
the retransmit timer expired.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
We don't want to send a PING ACK for every new incoming call as that just
adds to the network traffic. Instead, we send a PING ACK to the first
three that we receive and then once per second thereafter.
This could probably be made adjustable in future.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reduce the number of ACK-Requests we set on DATA packets that we're sending
to reduce network traffic. We set the flag on odd-numbered DATA packets to
start off the RTT cache until we have at least three entries in it and then
probe once per second thereafter to keep it topped up.
This could be made tunable in future.
Note that from this point, the RXRPC_REQUEST_ACK flag is set on DATA
packets as we transmit them and not stored statically in the sk_buff.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In addition to sending a PING ACK to gain RTT data, we can set the
RXRPC_REQUEST_ACK flag on a DATA packet and get a REQUESTED-ACK ACK. The
ACK packet contains the serial number of the packet it is in response to,
so we can look through the Tx buffer for a matching DATA packet.
This requires that the data packets be stamped with the time of
transmission as a ktime rather than having the resend_at time in jiffies.
This further requires the resend code to do the resend determination in
ktimes and convert to jiffies to set the timer.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Expedite the transmission of a response to a PING ACK by sending it from
sendmsg if one is pending. We're most likely to see a PING ACK during the
client call Tx phase as the other side may use it to determine a number of
parameters, such as the client's receive window size, the RTT and whether
the client is doing slow start (similar to RFC5681).
If we don't expedite it, it's left to the background processing thread to
transmit.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Send a PING ACK packet to the peer when we get a new incoming call from a
peer we don't have a record for. The PING RESPONSE ACK packet will tell us
the following about the peer:
(1) its receive window size
(2) its MTU sizes
(3) its support for jumbo DATA packets
(4) if it supports slow start (similar to RFC 5681)
(5) an estimate of the RTT
This is necessary because the peer won't normally send us an ACK until it
gets to the Rx phase and we send it a packet, but we would like to know
some of this information before we start sending packets.
A pair of tracepoints are added so that RTT determination can be observed.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Add a function to track the average RTT for a peer. Sources of RTT data
will be added in subsequent patches.
The RTT data will be useful in the future for determining resend timeouts
and for handling the slow-start part of the Rx protocol.
Also add a pair of tracepoints, one to log transmissions to elicit a
response for RTT purposes and one to log responses that contribute RTT
data.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Add a Tx-phase annotation for packet buffers to indicate that a buffer has
already been retransmitted. This will be used by future congestion
management. Re-retransmissions of a packet don't affect the congestion
window managment in the same way as initial retransmissions.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Don't store the rxrpc protocol header in sk_buffs on the transmit queue,
but rather generate it on the fly and pass it to kernel_sendmsg() as a
separate iov. This reduces the amount of storage required.
Note that the security header is still stored in the sk_buff as it may get
encrypted along with the data (and doesn't change with each transmission).
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Add a configuration option to inject packet loss by discarding
approximately every 8th packet received and approximately every 8th DATA
packet transmitted.
Note that no locking is used, but it shouldn't really matter.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Improve sk_buff tracing within AF_RXRPC by the following means:
(1) Use an enum to note the event type rather than plain integers and use
an array of event names rather than a big multi ?: list.
(2) Distinguish Rx from Tx packets and account them separately. This
requires the call phase to be tracked so that we know what we might
find in rxtx_buffer[].
(3) Add a parameter to rxrpc_{new,see,get,free}_skb() to indicate the
event type.
(4) A pair of 'rotate' events are added to indicate packets that are about
to be rotated out of the Rx and Tx windows.
(5) A pair of 'lost' events are added, along with rxrpc_lose_skb() for
packet loss injection recording.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Remove _enter/_debug/_leave calls from rxrpc_recvmsg_data() of which one
uses an uninitialised variable.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Add a tracepoint to follow the insertion of a packet into the transmit
buffer, its transmission and its rotation out of the buffer.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Add a pair of tracepoints, one to track rxrpc_connection struct ref
counting and the other to track the client connection cache state.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Add additional call tracepoint points for noting call-connected,
call-released and connection-failed events.
Also fix one tracepoint that was using an integer instead of the
corresponding enum value as the point type.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Print a symbolic packet type name for each valid received packet in the
trace output, not just a number.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Fix the basic transmit DATA packet content size at 1412 bytes so that they
can be arbitrarily assembled into jumbo packets.
In the future, I'm thinking of moving to keeping a jumbo packet header at
the beginning of each packet in the Tx queue and creating the packet header
on the spot when kernel_sendmsg() is invoked. That way, jumbo packets can
be assembled on the spur of the moment for (re-)transmission.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
rxrpc_send_call_packet() should use type in both its switch-statements
rather than using pkt->whdr.type. This might give the compiler an easier
job of uninitialised variable checking.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Don't transmit an ACK if call->ackr_reason in unset. There's the
possibility of a race between recvmsg() sending an ACK and the background
processing thread trying to send the same one.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Make the retransmission algorithm use for-loops instead of do-loops and
move the counter increments into the for-statement increment slots.
Though the do-loops are slighly more efficient since there will be at least
one pass through the each loop, the counter increments are harder to get
right as the continue-statements skip them.
Without this, if there are any positive acks within the loop, the do-loop
will cycle forever because the counter increment is never done.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
The soft-ACK parser doesn't increment the pointer into the soft-ACK list,
resulting in the first ACK/NACK value being applied to all the relevant
packets in the Tx queue. This has the potential to miss retransmissions
and cause excessive retransmissions.
Fix this by incrementing the pointer.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
If the last call on a client connection is release after the connection has
had a bunch of calls allocated but before any DATA packets are sent (so
that it's not yet marked RXRPC_CONN_EXPOSED), an assertion will happen in
rxrpc_disconnect_client_call().
af_rxrpc: Assertion failed - 1(0x1) >= 2(0x2) is false
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at ../net/rxrpc/conn_client.c:753!
This is because it's expecting the conn to have been exposed and to have 2
or more refs - but this isn't necessarily the case.
Simply remove the assertion. This allows the conn to be moved into the
inactive state and deleted if it isn't resurrected before the final put is
called.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Call rxrpc_release_call() on getting an error in rxrpc_new_client_call()
rather than trying to do the cleanup ourselves. This isn't a problem,
provided we set RXRPC_CALL_HAS_USERID only if we actually add the call to
the calls tree as cleanup code fragments that would otherwise cause
problems are conditional.
Without this, we miss some of the cleanup.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In rxrpc_put_one_client_conn(), if a connection has RXRPC_CONN_COUNTED set
on it, then it's accounted for in rxrpc_nr_client_conns and may be on
various lists - and this is cleaned up correctly.
However, if the connection doesn't have RXRPC_CONN_COUNTED set on it, then
the put routine returns rather than just skipping the extra bit of cleanup.
Fix this by making the extra bit of clean up conditional instead and always
killing off the connection.
This manifests itself as connections with a zero usage count hanging around
in /proc/net/rxrpc_conns because the connection allocated, but discarded,
due to a race with another process that set up a parallel connection, which
was then shared instead.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Purge the queue of to_be_accepted calls on socket release. Note that
purging sock_calls doesn't release the ref owned by to_be_accepted.
Probably the sock_calls list is redundant given a purges of the recvmsg_q,
the to_be_accepted queue and the calls tree.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Record calls that need to be accepted using sk_acceptq_added() otherwise
the backlog counter goes negative because sk_acceptq_removed() is called.
This causes the preallocator to malfunction.
Calls that are preaccepted by AFS within the kernel aren't affected by
this.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
The code for determining the last packet in rxrpc_recvmsg_data() has been
using the RXRPC_CALL_RX_LAST flag to determine if the rx_top pointer points
to the last packet or not. This isn't a good idea, however, as the input
code may be running simultaneously on another CPU and that sets the flag
*before* updating the top pointer.
Fix this by the following means:
(1) Restrict the use of RXRPC_CALL_RX_LAST to the input routines only.
There's otherwise a synchronisation problem between detecting the flag
and checking tx_top. This could probably be dealt with by appropriate
application of memory barriers, but there's a simpler way.
(2) Set RXRPC_CALL_RX_LAST after setting rx_top.
(3) Make rxrpc_rotate_rx_window() consult the flags header field of the
DATA packet it's about to discard to see if that was the last packet.
Use this as the basis for ending the Rx phase. This shouldn't be a
problem because the recvmsg side of things is guaranteed to see the
packets in order.
(4) Make rxrpc_recvmsg_data() return 1 to indicate the end of the data if:
(a) the packet it has just processed is marked as RXRPC_LAST_PACKET
(b) the call's Rx phase has been ended.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Move the check of rx_pkt_offset from rxrpc_locate_data() to the caller,
rxrpc_recvmsg_data(), so that it's more clear what's going on there.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Add CONFIG_AF_RXRPC_IPV6 and make the IPv6 support code conditional on it.
This is then made conditional on CONFIG_IPV6.
Without this, the following can be seen:
net/built-in.o: In function `rxrpc_init_peer':
>> peer_object.c:(.text+0x18c3c8): undefined reference to `ip6_route_output_flags'
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add IPv6 support to AF_RXRPC. With this, AF_RXRPC sockets can be created:
service = socket(AF_RXRPC, SOCK_DGRAM, PF_INET6);
instead of:
service = socket(AF_RXRPC, SOCK_DGRAM, PF_INET);
The AFS filesystem doesn't support IPv6 at the moment, though, since that
requires upgrades to some of the RPC calls.
Note that a good portion of this patch is replacing "%pI4:%u" in print
statements with "%pISpc" which is able to handle both protocols and print
the port.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
There are two places that want to transmit a packet in response to one just
received and manually pick the address to reply to out of the sk_buff.
Make them use rxrpc_extract_addr_from_skb() instead so that IPv6 is handled
automatically.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Create an address for sendmsg() to bind unbound socket with rather than
using a completely blank address otherwise the transport socket creation
will fail because it will try to use address family 0.
We use the address family specified in the protocol argument when the
AF_RXRPC socket was created and SOCK_DGRAM as the default. For anything
else, bind() must be used.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
call->rx_winsize should be initialised to the sysctl setting and the sysctl
setting should be limited to the maximum we want to permit. Further, we
need to place this in the ACK info instead of the sysctl setting.
Furthermore, discard the idea of accepting the subpackets of a jumbo packet
that lie beyond the receive window when the first packet of the jumbo is
within the window. Just discard the excess subpackets instead. This
allows the receive window to be opened up right to the buffer size less one
for the dead slot.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
The preallocated call buffer holds a ref on the calls within that buffer.
The ref was being released in the wrong place - it worked okay for incoming
calls to the AFS cache manager service, but doesn't work right for incoming
calls to a userspace service.
Instead of releasing an extra ref service calls in rxrpc_release_call(),
the ref needs to be released during the acceptance/rejectance process. To
this end:
(1) The prealloc ref is now normally released during
rxrpc_new_incoming_call().
(2) For preallocated kernel API calls, the kernel API's ref needs to be
released when the call is discarded on socket close.
(3) We shouldn't take a second ref in rxrpc_accept_call().
(4) rxrpc_recvmsg_new_call() needs to get a ref of its own when it adds
the call to the to_be_accepted socket queue.
In doing (4) above, we would prefer not to put the call's refcount down to
0 as that entails doing cleanup in softirq context, but it's unlikely as
there are several refs held elsewhere, at least one of which must be put by
someone in process context calling rxrpc_release_call(). However, it's not
a problem if we do have to do that.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Adjust the call ref tracepoint to show references held on a call by the
kernel API separately as much as possible and add an additional trace to at
the allocation point from the preallocation buffer for an incoming call.
Note that this doesn't show the allocation of a client call for the kernel
separately at the moment.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Allow tx_winsize to grow when the ACK info packet shows a larger receive
window at the other end rather than only permitting it to shrink.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
skb->len should be used rather than skb->data_len when referring to the
amount of data in a packet. This will only cause a malfunction in the
following cases:
(1) We receive a jumbo packet (validation and splitting both are wrong).
(2) We see if there's extra ACK info in an ACK packet (we think it's not
there and just ignore it).
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
