After reboot, it's not possible to use hotkeys to enter BIOS setup
and boot menu on some HP laptops.
BIOS folks identified the root cause is the missing _PTS call, and
BIOS is expecting _PTS to do proper reset.
Using S5 for reboot is default behavior under Windows, "A full
shutdown (S5) occurs when a system restart is requested" [1], so
let's do the same here.
[1] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/power/system-power-states
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
[ rjw: Subject edit ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The CFS wakeup code will only ever go through EAS / its fast path on
"regular" wakeups (i.e. not on forks or execs). These are currently gated
by a check against 'sd_flag', which would be SD_BALANCE_WAKE at wakeup.
However, we now have a flag that explicitly tells us whether a wakeup is a
"regular" one, so hinge those conditions on that flag instead.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102184514.2733-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Only select_task_rq_fair() uses that parameter to do an actual domain
search, other classes only care about what kind of wakeup is happening
(fork, exec, or "regular") and thus just translate the flag into a wakeup
type.
WF_TTWU and WF_EXEC have just been added, use these along with WF_FORK to
encode the wakeup types we care about. For select_task_rq_fair(), we can
simply use the shiny new WF_flag : SD_flag mapping.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102184514.2733-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com
To remove the sd_flag parameter of select_task_rq(), we need another way of
encoding wakeup types. There already is a WF_FORK flag, add the missing two.
With that said, we still need an easy way to turn WF_foo into
SD_bar (e.g. WF_TTWU into SD_BALANCE_WAKE). As suggested by Peter, let's
make our lives easier and make them match exactly, and throw in some
compile-time checks for good measure.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102184514.2733-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
In order to minimize the interference of migrate_disable() on lower
priority tasks, which can be deprived of runtime due to being stuck
below a higher priority task. Teach the RT/DL balancers to push away
these higher priority tasks when a lower priority task gets selected
to run on a freshly demoted CPU (pull).
This adds migration interference to the higher priority task, but
restores bandwidth to system that would otherwise be irrevocably lost.
Without this it would be possible to have all tasks on the system
stuck on a single CPU, each task preempted in a migrate_disable()
section with a single high priority task running.
This way we can still approximate running the M highest priority tasks
on the system.
Migrating the top task away is (ofcourse) still subject to
migrate_disable() too, which means the lower task is subject to an
interference equivalent to the worst case migrate_disable() section.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102347.499155098@infradead.org
Concurrent migrate_disable() and set_cpus_allowed_ptr() has
interesting features. We rely on set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to not return
until the task runs inside the provided mask. This expectation is
exported to userspace.
This means that any set_cpus_allowed_ptr() caller must wait until
migrate_enable() allows migrations.
At the same time, we don't want migrate_enable() to schedule, due to
patterns like:
preempt_disable();
migrate_disable();
...
migrate_enable();
preempt_enable();
And:
raw_spin_lock(&B);
spin_unlock(&A);
this means that when migrate_enable() must restore the affinity
mask, it cannot wait for completion thereof. Luck will have it that
that is exactly the case where there is a pending
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(), so let that provide storage for the async stop
machine.
Much thanks to Valentin who used TLA+ most effective and found lots of
'interesting' cases.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.921768277@infradead.org
Add the base migrate_disable() support (under protest).
While migrate_disable() is (currently) required for PREEMPT_RT, it is
also one of the biggest flaws in the system.
Notably this is just the base implementation, it is broken vs
sched_setaffinity() and hotplug, both solved in additional patches for
ease of review.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.818170844@infradead.org
Since we now migrate tasks away before DYING, we should also move
bandwidth unthrottle, otherwise we can gain tasks from unthrottle
after we expect all tasks to be gone already.
Also; it looks like the RT balancers don't respect cpu_active() and
instead rely on rq->online in part, complete this. This too requires
we do set_rq_offline() earlier to match the cpu_active() semantics.
(The bigger patch is to convert RT to cpu_active() entirely)
Since set_rq_online() is called from sched_cpu_activate(), place
set_rq_offline() in sched_cpu_deactivate().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.639538965@infradead.org
With the new mechanism which kicks tasks off the outgoing CPU at the end of
schedule() the situation on an outgoing CPU right before the stopper thread
brings it down completely is:
- All user tasks and all unbound kernel threads have either been migrated
away or are not running and the next wakeup will move them to a online CPU.
- All per CPU kernel threads, except cpu hotplug thread and the stopper
thread have either been unbound or parked by the responsible CPU hotplug
callback.
That means that at the last step before the stopper thread is invoked the
cpu hotplug thread is the last legitimate running task on the outgoing
CPU.
Add a final wait step right before the stopper thread is kicked which
ensures that any still running tasks on the way to park or on the way to
kick themself of the CPU are either sleeping or gone.
This allows to remove the migrate_tasks() crutch in sched_cpu_dying(). If
sched_cpu_dying() detects that there is still another running task aside of
the stopper thread then it will explode with the appropriate fireworks.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.547163969@infradead.org
RT kernels need to ensure that all tasks which are not per CPU kthreads
have left the outgoing CPU to guarantee that no tasks are force migrated
within a migrate disabled section.
There is also some desire to (ab)use fine grained CPU hotplug control to
clear a CPU from active state to force migrate tasks which are not per CPU
kthreads away for power control purposes.
Add a mechanism which waits until all tasks which should leave the CPU
after the CPU active flag is cleared have moved to a different online CPU.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.377836842@infradead.org
In preparation for migrate_disable(), make sure only per-cpu kthreads
are allowed to run on !active CPUs.
This is ran (as one of the very first steps) from the cpu-hotplug
task which is a per-cpu kthread and completion of the hotplug
operation only requires such tasks.
This constraint enables the migrate_disable() implementation to wait
for completion of all migrate_disable regions on this CPU at hotplug
time without fear of any new ones starting.
This replaces the unlikely(rq->balance_callbacks) test at the tail of
context_switch with an unlikely(rq->balance_work), the fast path is
not affected.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.292709163@infradead.org
The intent of balance_callback() has always been to delay executing
balancing operations until the end of the current rq->lock section.
This is because balance operations must often drop rq->lock, and that
isn't safe in general.
However, as noted by Scott, there were a few holes in that scheme;
balance_callback() was called after rq->lock was dropped, which means
another CPU can interleave and touch the callback list.
Rework code to call the balance callbacks before dropping rq->lock
where possible, and otherwise splice the balance list onto a local
stack.
This guarantees that the balance list must be empty when we take
rq->lock. IOW, we'll only ever run our own balance callbacks.
Reported-by: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.203901269@infradead.org
Reading /proc/sys/kernel/sched_domain/cpu*/domain0/flags mutliple times
with small reads causes oopses with slub corruption issues because the kfree is
free'ing an offset from a previous allocation. Fix this by adding in a new
pointer 'buf' for the allocation and kfree and use the temporary pointer tmp
to handle memory copies of the buf offsets.
Fixes: 5b9f8ff7b3 ("sched/debug: Output SD flag names rather than their values")
Reported-by: Jeff Bastian <jbastian@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029151103.373410-1-colin.king@canonical.com
During fast wakeup path, scheduler always check whether local or prev
cpus are good candidates for the task before looking for other cpus in
the domain. With commit b7a331615d ("sched/fair: Add asymmetric CPU
capacity wakeup scan") the heterogenous system gains a dedicated path
but doesn't try to reuse prev cpu whenever possible. If the previous
cpu is idle and belong to the LLC domain, we should check it 1st
before looking for another cpu because it stays one of the best
candidate and this also stabilizes task placement on the system.
This change aligns asymmetric path behavior with symmetric one and reduces
cases where the task migrates across all cpus of the sd_asym_cpucapacity
domains at wakeup.
This change does not impact normal EAS mode but only the overloaded case or
when EAS is not used.
- On hikey960 with performance governor (EAS disable)
./perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
mainline w/ patch
# migrations 999364 0
ops/sec 149313(+/-0.28%) 182587(+/- 0.40) +22%
- On hikey with performance governor
./perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
mainline w/ patch
# migrations 0 0
ops/sec 47721(+/-0.76%) 47899(+/- 0.56) +0.4%
According to test on hikey, the patch doesn't impact symmetric system
compared to current implementation (only tested on arm64)
Also read the uclamped value of task's utilization at most twice instead
instead each time we compare task's utilization with cpu's capacity.
Fixes: b7a331615d ("sched/fair: Add asymmetric CPU capacity wakeup scan")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029161824.26389-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
schbench shows latency increase for 95 percentile above since:
commit 0b0695f2b3 ("sched/fair: Rework load_balance()")
Align the behavior of the load balancer with the wake up path, which tries
to select an idle CPU which belongs to the LLC for a waking task.
calculate_imbalance() will use nr_running instead of the spare
capacity when CPUs share resources (ie cache) at the domain level. This
will ensure a better spread of tasks on idle CPUs.
Running schbench on a hikey (8cores arm64) shows the problem:
tip/sched/core :
schbench -m 2 -t 4 -s 10000 -c 1000000 -r 10
Latency percentiles (usec)
50.0th: 33
75.0th: 45
90.0th: 51
95.0th: 4152
*99.0th: 14288
99.5th: 14288
99.9th: 14288
min=0, max=14276
tip/sched/core + patch :
schbench -m 2 -t 4 -s 10000 -c 1000000 -r 10
Latency percentiles (usec)
50.0th: 34
75.0th: 47
90.0th: 52
95.0th: 78
*99.0th: 94
99.5th: 94
99.9th: 94
min=0, max=94
Fixes: 0b0695f2b3 ("sched/fair: Rework load_balance()")
Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Suggested-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Tested-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102102457.28808-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Chris Wilson reported a problem spotted by check_chain_key(): a chain
key got changed in validate_chain() because we modify the ->read in
validate_chain() to skip checks for dependency adding, and ->read is
taken into calculation for chain key since commit f611e8cf98
("lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate
chainkey").
Fix this by avoiding to modify ->read in validate_chain() based on two
facts: a) since we now support recursive read lock detection, there is
no need to skip checks for dependency adding for recursive readers, b)
since we have a), there is only one case left (nest_lock) where we want
to skip checks in validate_chain(), we simply remove the modification
for ->read and rely on the return value of check_deadlock() to skip the
dependency adding.
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102053743.450459-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
A new cpufreq governor flag will be added subsequently, so replace
the bool dynamic_switching fleid in struct cpufreq_governor with a
flags field and introduce CPUFREQ_GOV_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING to set for
the "dynamic switching" governors instead of it.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Commit ce3d31ad3c ("arm64/smp: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier") ensured
that RCU is informed early about incoming CPUs that might end up calling
into printk() before they are online. However, if such a CPU fails the
early CPU feature compatibility checks in check_local_cpu_capabilities(),
then it will be powered off or parked without informing RCU, leading to
an endless stream of stalls:
| rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
| rcu: 2-O...: (0 ticks this GP) idle=002/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=0/0 fqs=2593
| (detected by 0, t=5252 jiffies, g=9317, q=136)
| Task dump for CPU 2:
| task:swapper/2 state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 0 ppid: 1 flags:0x00000028
| Call trace:
| ret_from_fork+0x0/0x30
Ensure that the dying CPU invokes rcu_report_dead() prior to being powered
off or parked.
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201105222242.GA8842@willie-the-truck
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106103602.9849-3-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Currently perf_event_attr::exclusive can be used to ensure an
event(group) is the sole group scheduled on the PMU. One consequence
is that when you have a pinned event (say the watchdog) you can no
longer have regular exclusive event(group)s.
Inspired by the fact that !pinned events are considered less strict,
allow !pinned,exclusive events to share the PMU with pinned,!exclusive
events.
Pinned,exclusive is still fully exclusive.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029162902.105962225@infradead.org
Commit 9e6302056f ("perf: Use hrtimers for event multiplexing")
placed the hrtimer (re)start call in the wrong place. Instead of
capturing all scheduling failures, it only considered the PMU failure.
The result is that groups using perf_event_attr::exclusive are no
longer rotated.
Fixes: 9e6302056f ("perf: Use hrtimers for event multiplexing")
Reported-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029162902.038667689@infradead.org
Since event_sched_out() clears cpuctx->exclusive upon removal of an
exclusive event (and only group leaders can be exclusive), there is no
point in group_sched_out() trying to do it too. It is impossible for
cpuctx->exclusive to still be set here.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029162901.904060564@infradead.org
Core changes to support TASK_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
* tag 'core-entry-notify-signal' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
task_work: Use TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL if available
entry: Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
signal: Add task_sigpending() helper
Many comments in this module do not comply with the preferred multi-line
comment style as reported by 'scripts/checkpatch.pl':
WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
Fix those comments, along with (unreported for some reason?) the starts
of the multi-line comments not being /* on their own line...
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omprussia.ru>
Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Some functions have the proper 'kernel-doc' comments but these don't start
with proper /** -- fix that, along with adding () to the function name on
the following lines to fully comply with the 'kernel-doc' format.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omprussia.ru>
Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Some 'kernel-doc' function comments do not fully comply with the specified
format due to:
- missing () after the function name;
- "RETURNS:"/"Returns:" instead of "Return:" when documenting the function's
result.
- empty line before describing the function's arguments.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omprussia.ru>
Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
current->group_leader->exit_signal may change during copy_process() if
current->real_parent exits.
Move the assignment inside tasklist_lock to avoid the race.
Signed-off-by: Eddy Wu <eddy_wu@trendmicro.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Pull perf fix from Thomas Gleixner:
"A single fix for the perf core plugging a memory leak in the address
filter parser"
* tag 'perf-urgent-2020-11-08' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
perf/core: Fix a memory leak in perf_event_parse_addr_filter()
Pull futex fix from Thomas Gleixner:
"A single fix for the futex code where an intermediate state in the
underlying RT mutex was not handled correctly and triggering a BUG()
instead of treating it as another variant of retry condition"
* tag 'locking-urgent-2020-11-08' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
futex: Handle transient "ownerless" rtmutex state correctly
Pull irq fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
"A set of fixes for interrupt chip drivers:
- Fix the fallout of the IPI as interrupt conversion in Kconfig and
the BCM2836 interrupt chip driver
- Fixes for interrupt affinity setting and the handling of
hierarchical irq domains in the SiFive PLIC driver
- Make the unmapped event handling in the TI SCI driver work
correctly
- A few minor fixes and cleanups in various chip drivers and Kconfig"
* tag 'irq-urgent-2020-11-08' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
dt-bindings: irqchip: ti, sci-inta: Fix diagram indentation for unmapped events
irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Add support for unmapped event handling
dt-bindings: irqchip: ti, sci-inta: Update for unmapped event handling
irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin: Merge irlm_bit and needs_irlm
irqchip/sifive-plic: Fix chip_data access within a hierarchy
irqchip/sifive-plic: Fix broken irq_set_affinity() callback
irqchip/stm32-exti: Add all LP timer exti direct events support
irqchip/bcm2836: Fix missing __init annotation
irqchip/mips: Drop selection of IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
irqchip/mst: Make mst_intc_of_init static
irqchip/mst: MST_IRQ should depend on ARCH_MEDIATEK or ARCH_MSTARV7
genirq: Let GENERIC_IRQ_IPI select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
Pull entry code fix from Thomas Gleixner:
"A single fix for the generic entry code to correct the wrong
assumption that the lockdep interrupt state needs not to be
established before calling the RCU check"
* tag 'core-urgent-2020-11-08' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
entry: Fix the incorrect ordering of lockdep and RCU check
