As reported by cocinelle:
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:182:2-18: code aligned with following code on line 183
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:184:2-19: code aligned with following code on line 185
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:186:2-19: code aligned with following code on line 187
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:188:2-17: code aligned with following code on line 189
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:190:2-19: code aligned with following code on line 191
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:192:2-19: code aligned with following code on line 193
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:194:2-18: code aligned with following code on line 195
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:196:2-17: code aligned with following code on line 197
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:198:2-18: code aligned with following code on line 199
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:200:2-19: code aligned with following code on line 201
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:202:2-18: code aligned with following code on line 203
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:204:2-16: code aligned with following code on line 205
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:206:2-20: code aligned with following code on line 207
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:208:2-17: code aligned with following code on line 209
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:210:2-18: code aligned with following code on line 211
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:212:2-18: code aligned with following code on line 213
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:214:2-18: code aligned with following code on line 215
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:216:2-16: code aligned with following code on line 217
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:218:2-18: code aligned with following code on line 219
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:220:2-20: code aligned with following code on line 221
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:222:2-21: code aligned with following code on line 223
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:224:2-20: code aligned with following code on line 225
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:226:2-23: code aligned with following code on line 227
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:228:2-23: code aligned with following code on line 229
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:230:2-22: code aligned with following code on line 231
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:232:2-24: code aligned with following code on line 233
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:234:2-19: code aligned with following code on line 235
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:236:2-19: code aligned with following code on line 237
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:238:2-20: code aligned with following code on line 239
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:240:2-19: code aligned with following code on line 241
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Coverity CID 1196501: Missing break in switch (MISSING_BREAK)
I introduced that bug recently by commit
96a5b3a869.
As a result, it will flood unintentionally error message to log.
Reported-by: <scan-admin@coverity.com>
Signed-off-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
There is now new tuner types which are not handled on that switch-case.
Print error if unknown tuner type is meet.
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c: In function ‘generic_set_freq’:
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:1037:2: warning: enumeration value ‘V4L2_TUNER_ADC’ not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
switch (new_type) {
^
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:1037:2: warning: enumeration value ‘V4L2_TUNER_RF’ not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Only send a power down command for the device if it is not already
in power down state. That prevents a timeout when trying to talk
with the device.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
This macro is not used. remove it.
Reviewed-by: Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Dynamic static allocation is evil, as Kernel stack is too low, and
compilation complains about it on some archs:
drivers/media/tuners/tuner-xc2028.c:651:1: warning: 'load_firmware' uses dynamic stack allocation [enabled by default]
Instead, let's enforce a limit for the buffer.
In the specific case of this driver, the maximum limit is 80, used only
on tm6000 driver. This limit is due to the size of the USB control URBs.
Ok, it would be theoretically possible to use a bigger size on PCI
devices, but the firmware load time is already good enough. Anyway,
if some usage requires more, it is just a matter of also increasing
the buffer size at load_firmware().
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Move the tuners one level up, as the "common" directory will be used
by drivers that are shared between more than one driver.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
