Commit f5a44db5d2 introduced a regression on filesystems created with
the bigalloc feature (cluster size > blocksize). It causes xfstests
generic/006 and /013 to fail with an unexpected JBD2 failure and
transaction abort that leaves the test file system in a read only state.
Other xfstests run on bigalloc file systems are likely to fail as well.
The cause is the accidental use of a cluster mask where a cluster
offset was needed in ext4_ext_map_blocks().
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
The missing casts can cause the high 64-bits of the physical blocks to
be lost. Set up new macros which allows us to make sure the right
thing happen, even if at some point we end up supporting larger
logical block numbers.
Thanks to the Emese Revfy and the PaX security team for reporting this
issue.
Reported-by: PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>
Reported-by: Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
A corrupted ext4 may have out of order leaf extents, i.e.
extent: lblk 0--1023, len 1024, pblk 9217, flags: LEAF UNINIT
extent: lblk 1000--2047, len 1024, pblk 10241, flags: LEAF UNINIT
^^^^ overlap with previous extent
Reading such extent could hit BUG_ON() in ext4_es_cache_extent().
BUG_ON(end < lblk);
The problem is that __read_extent_tree_block() tries to cache holes as
well but assumes 'lblk' is greater than 'prev' and passes underflowed
length to ext4_es_cache_extent(). Fix it by checking for overlapping
extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries().
I hit this when fuzz testing ext4, and am able to reproduce it by
modifying the on-disk extent by hand.
Also add the check for (ee_block + len - 1) in ext4_valid_extent() to
make sure the value is not overflow.
Ran xfstests on patched ext4 and no regression.
Cc: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Commit ec22ba8e ("ext4: disable merging of uninitialized extents")
ensured that if either extent under consideration is uninit, we
decline to merge, and ext4_can_extents_be_merged() returns false.
So there is no need for the caller to then test whether the
extent under consideration is unitialized; if it were, we
wouldn't have gotten that far.
The comments were also inaccurate; ext4_can_extents_be_merged()
no longer XORs the states, it fails if *either* is uninit.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Commit ec22ba8e ("ext4: disable merging of uninitialized extents")
ensured that if either extent under consideration is uninit, we
decline to merge, and immediately return.
But right after that test, we test again for an uninit
extent; we can never hit this. So just remove the impossible
test and associated variable.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
After applied the commit (4a092d73), we have reduced the number of
source files that need to #include ext4_extents.h. But we can do
better.
This commit defines ext4_zeroout_es() in extents.c and move
EXT_MAX_BLOCKS into ext4.h in order not to include ext4_extents.h in
indirect.c and ioctl.c. Meanwhile we just need to include this file in
extent_status.c when ES_AGGRESSIVE_TEST is defined. Otherwise, this
commit removes a duplicated declaration in trace/events/ext4.h.
After applied this patch, we just need to include ext4_extents.h file
in {super,migrate,move_extents,extents}.c, and it is easy for us to
define a new extent disk layout.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
If ext_debugging is enabled and path[depth].p_ext is NULL, len
and lblock are printed non initialized
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
reaim workfile.dbase test easily triggers warning in
ext4_da_update_reserve_space():
EXT4-fs warning (device ram0): ext4_da_update_reserve_space:365:
ino 12, allocated 1 with only 0 reserved metadata blocks (releasing 1
blocks with reserved 9 data blocks)
The problem is that (one of) tests creates file and then randomly writes
to it with O_SYNC. That results in writing back pages of the file in
random order so we create extents for written blocks say 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
- this last allocation also allocates new block for extents. Then we
writeout block 1 so we have extents 0-2, 4, 6, 8 and we release
indirect extent block because extents fit in the inode again. Then we
writeout block 10 and we need to allocate indirect extent block again
which triggers the warning because we don't have the reservation
anymore.
Fix the problem by giving back freed metadata blocks resulting from
extent merging into inode's reservation pool.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Add a new fiemap flag which forces the all of the extents in an inode
to be cached in the extent_status tree. This is critically important
when using AIO to a preallocated file, since if we need to read in
blocks from the extent tree, the io_submit(2) system call becomes
synchronous, and the AIO is no longer "A", which is bad.
In addition, for most files which have an external leaf tree block,
the cost of caching the information in the extent status tree will be
less than caching the entire 4k block in the buffer cache. So it is
generally a win to keep the extent information cached.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
When we read in an extent tree leaf block from disk, arrange to have
all of its entries cached. In nearly all cases the in-memory
representation will be more compact than the on-disk representation in
the buffer cache, and it allows us to get the information without
having to traverse the extent tree for successive extents.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
When we find an invalid extent tree block, report the block number of
the bad block for debugging purposes.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Refactor out the code needed to read the extent tree block into a
single read_extent_tree_block() function. In addition to simplifying
the code, it also makes sure that we call the ext4_ext_load_extent
tracepoint whenever we need to read an extent tree block from disk.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
If there are no items in the extent status tree, ext4_es_lru_add() is
a no-op. So it is not sufficient to call ext4_es_lru_add() before we
try to lookup an entry in the extent status tree. We also need to
call it at the end of ext4_ext_map_blocks(), after items have been
added to the extent status tree.
This could lead to inodes with that have extent status trees but which
are not in the LRU list, which means they won't get considered for
eviction by the es_shrinker.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
During large unlink operations on files with extents, we can use a lot
of CPU time. This adds a cond_resched() call when starting to examine
the next level of a multi-level extent tree. Multi-level extent trees
are rare in the first place, and this should rarely be executed.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
In ext4_ext_map_blocks(), if we have successfully allocated the data
blocks, but then run into trouble inserting the extent into the extent
tree, most likely due to an ENOSPC condition, determine the arguments
to ext4_free_blocks() in a simpler way which is easier to prove to be
correct.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Previously ext4_ext_truncate() was ignoring potential error returns
from ext4_es_remove_extent() and ext4_ext_remove_space(). This can
lead to the on-diks extent tree and the extent status tree cache
getting out of sync, which is particuarlly bad, and can lead to file
system corruption and potential data loss.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Both hole punch and truncate use ext4_ext_rm_leaf() for removing
blocks. Currently we choose the last extent as the starting
point for removing blocks:
ex = EXT_LAST_EXTENT(eh);
This is OK for truncate but for hole punch we can optimize the extent
selection as the path is already initialized. We could use this
information to select proper starting extent. The code change in this
patch will not affect truncate as for truncate path[depth].p_ext will
always be NULL.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Translate the bitfields used in various flags argument to strings to
make the tracepoint output more human-readable.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
No need to pass file pointer when we can directly pass inode pointer.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Return the FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNKNOWN flag as well except the
FIEMAP_EXTENT_DELALLOC because the data location of an
delayed allocation extent is unknown.
Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Commit 18888cf088: "ext4: speed up truncate/unlink by not using
bforget() unless needed" removed the use of EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET in
the most important codepath for file systems using extents, but a
similar optimization also can be done for file systems using indirect
blocks, and for the two special cases in the ext4 extents code.
Cc: Andrey Sidorov <qrxd43@motorola.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Later we would like to clear PageWriteback bit only after extent
conversion from unwritten to written extents is performed. However it
is not possible to start a transaction after PageWriteback is set
because that violates lock ordering (and is easy to deadlock). So we
have to reserve a transaction before locking pages and sending them
for IO and later we use the transaction for extent conversion from
ext4_end_io().
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
We limit the number of blocks written in a single loop of
ext4_da_writepages() to 64 when inode uses indirect blocks. That is
unnecessary as credit estimates for mapping logically continguous run
of blocks is rather low even for inode with indirect blocks. So just
lift this limitation and properly calculate the number of necessary
credits.
This better credit estimate will also later allow us to always write
at least a single page in one iteration.
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
On 32-bit architectures with 32-bit sector_t computation of data offset
in ext4_xattr_fiemap() can overflow resulting in reporting bogus data
location. Fix the problem by typing block number to proper type before
shifting.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently punch hole is disabled in file systems with bigalloc
feature enabled. However the recent changes in punch hole patch should
make it easier to support punching holes on bigalloc enabled file
systems.
This commit changes partial_cluster handling in ext4_remove_blocks(),
ext4_ext_rm_leaf() and ext4_ext_remove_space(). Currently
partial_cluster is unsigned long long type and it makes sure that we
will free the partial cluster if all extents has been released from that
cluster. However it has been specifically designed only for truncate.
With punch hole we can be freeing just some extents in the cluster
leaving the rest untouched. So we have to make sure that we will notice
cluster which still has some extents. To do this I've changed
partial_cluster to be signed long long type. The only scenario where
this could be a problem is when cluster_size == block size, however in
that case there would not be any partial clusters so we're safe. For
bigger clusters the signed type is enough. Now we use the negative value
in partial_cluster to mark such cluster used, hence we know that we must
not free it even if all other extents has been freed from such cluster.
This scenario can be described in simple diagram:
|FFF...FF..FF.UUU|
^----------^
punch hole
. - free space
| - cluster boundary
F - freed extent
U - used extent
Also update respective tracepoints to use signed long long type for
partial_cluster.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The "head removal" branch in the condition is never used in any code
path in ext4 since the function only caller ext4_ext_rm_leaf() will make
sure that the extent is properly split before removing blocks. Note that
there is a bug in this branch anyway.
This commit removes the unused code completely and makes use of
ext4_error() instead of printk if dubious range is provided.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We (Linux Kernel Performance project) found a regression introduced
by commit:
f7fec032aa ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree
The commit causes about 20% performance decrease in fio random write
test. Profiler shows that rb_next() uses a lot of CPU time. The call
stack is:
rb_next
ext4_es_find_delayed_extent
ext4_map_blocks
_ext4_get_block
ext4_get_block_write
__blockdev_direct_IO
ext4_direct_IO
generic_file_direct_write
__generic_file_aio_write
ext4_file_write
aio_rw_vect_retry
aio_run_iocb
do_io_submit
sys_io_submit
system_call_fastpath
io_submit
td_io_getevents
io_u_queued_complete
thread_main
main
__libc_start_main
The cause is that ext4_es_find_delayed_extent() doesn't have an
upper bound, it keeps searching until a delayed extent is found.
When there are a lots of non-delayed entries in the extent state
tree, ext4_es_find_delayed_extent() may uses a lot of CPU time.
Reported-by: LKP project <lkp@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Move ext4_ind_migrate() into migrate.c file since it makes much more
sense and ext4_ext_migrate() is there as well.
Also fix tiny style problem - add spaces around "=" in "i=0".
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently in ENOSPC condition when writing into unwritten space, or
punching a hole, we might need to split the extent and grow extent tree.
However since we can not allocate any new metadata blocks we'll have to
zero out unwritten part of extent or punched out part of extent, or in
the worst case return ENOSPC even though use actually does not allocate
any space.
Also in delalloc path we do reserve metadata and data blocks for the
time we're going to write out, however metadata block reservation is
very tricky especially since we expect that logical connectivity implies
physical connectivity, however that might not be the case and hence we
might end up allocating more metadata blocks than previously reserved.
So in future, metadata reservation checks should be removed since we can
not assure that we do not under reserve.
And this is where reserved space comes into the picture. When mounting
the file system we slice off a little bit of the file system space (2%
or 4096 clusters, whichever is smaller) which can be then used for the
cases mentioned above to prevent costly zeroout, or unexpected ENOSPC.
The number of reserved clusters can be set via sysfs, however it can
never be bigger than number of free clusters in the file system.
Note that this patch fixes the failure of xfstest 274 as expected.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
existing locking ordering: journal-> i_data_sem, but
ext4_ind_migrate() grab locks in opposite order which may result in
deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently when inserting extent in ext4_ext_insert_extent() we would
only try to to see if we can append new extent to the found extent. If
we can not, then we proceed with adding new extent into the extent tree,
but then possibly merging it back again.
We can avoid this situation by trying to append and prepend new extent
to the existing ones. However since the new extent can be on either
sides of the existing extent, we have to pick the right extent to try to
append/prepend to.
This patch adds the conditions to pick the right extent to
append/prepend to and adds the actual prepending condition as well. This
will also eliminate the need to use "reserved" block for possibly
growing extent tree.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently when converting extent to initialized we attempt to transfer
initialized block to the left neighbour if possible when certain
criteria are met. However we do not attempt to do the same for the
right neighbor.
This commit adds the possibility to transfer initialized block to the
right neighbour if:
1. We're not converting the whole extent
2. Both extents are stored in the same extent tree node
3. Right neighbor is initialized
4. Right neighbor is logically abutting the current one
5. Right neighbor is physically abutting the current one
6. Right neighbor would not overflow the length limit
This is basically the same logic as with transferring to the left. This
will gain us some performance benefits since it is faster than inserting
extent and then merging it.
It would also prevent some situation in delalloc patch when we might run
out of metadata reservation. This is due to the fact that we would
attempt to split the extent first (possibly allocating new metadata
block) even though we did not counted for that because it can (and will)
be merged again. This commit fix that scenario, because we no longer
need to split the extent in such case.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
In order to make it simpler to test the code which support
i_blocks/indirect-mapped inodes, support the conversion of inodes
which are less than 12 blocks and which are contained in no more than
a single extent.
The primary intended use of this code is to converting freshly created
zero-length files and empty directories.
Note that the version of chattr in e2fsprogs 1.42.7 and earlier has a
check that prevents the clearing of the extent flag. A simple patch
which allows "chattr -e <file>" to work will be checked into the
e2fsprogs git repository.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Move common code in ext4_ind_truncate() and ext4_ext_truncate() into
ext4_truncate(). This saves over 60 lines of code.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Move common code in ext4_ind_punch_hole() and ext4_ext_punch_hole()
into ext4_punch_hole(). This saves over 150 lines of code.
This also fixes a potential bug when the punch_hole() code is racing
against indirect-to-extents or extents-to-indirect migation. We are
currently using i_mutex to protect against changes to the inode flag;
specifically, the append-only, immutable, and extents inode flags. So
we need to take i_mutex before deciding whether to use the
extents-specific or indirect-specific punch_hole code.
Also, there was a missing call to ext4_inode_block_unlocked_dio() in
the indirect punch codepath. This was added in commit 02d262dffc
to block DIO readers racing against the punch operation in the
codepath for extent-mapped inodes, but it was missing for
indirect-block mapped inodes. One of the advantages of refactoring
the code is that it makes such oversights much less likely.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
When an extent was zeroed out, we forgot to do convert from cpu to le16.
It could make us hit a BUG_ON when we try to write dirty pages out. So
fix it.
[ Also fix a bug found by Dmitry Monakhov where we were missing
le32_to_cpu() calls in the new indirect punch hole code.
There are a number of other big endian warnings found by static code
analyzers, but we'll wait for the next merge window to fix them all
up. These fixes are designed to be Obviously Correct by code
inspection, and easy to demonstrate that it won't make any
difference (and hence, won't introduce any bugs) on little endian
architectures such as x86. --tytso ]
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
relatively obscure cornercases or races that were found using
regression tests.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAABCAAGBQJRSm5lAAoJENNvdpvBGATwZW8QAN7jMn7IaVCTXXblqgqba4uN
KvLGRgK7R/n1rIhdHoxJHumwRQLTppVzjDCc8ePnWhdypzMZNuzUvs+OoCFdkDsW
qf3CmL/p/R1oSiSzzFIs/7wGp7xBZ0l0BWZMFWd9EUg9cqoMBDA6KzcMF95fOtas
KsjRL+BThacVldS7jyKFwE4BrpXd0Z5V9qZ6wjQPPoBx8sXF4iYA+CZVo5FUKBs8
6I82LS1/PIYCe3IOSpCgyKXQqRzAYJANv1ndken5wW8jWT2R58e360OwZEVcpIN9
/caov+F5OKfk4iOGq3b+vwRplNhAI2S6C4vhMbmS2GPWE8Fnr8gubyqNAIIs5R/y
3zYHdqZESfuEF7K3QoAepiJhi3YIoRxXC1FxD7uxx7VBRhW2w8Ij5hlXhuSoh24M
MUiXgCeIxQb+ZfUx0OHV++LSOHVccU4y7Z0X+LpXQa6tEMBuSgK6yCKsGkyr8APN
gPMupTptgyUE3tFaCjqc7QKtmoeRAMSvzfqEyV6DlblIOe+3f/RJzRO222Xc4kxq
D9t2tOuPoXsR+ivtS5pEcrZkE4Y2hkJbJzb7XXvfoETixYsuX6VkiPK/D68S9eRe
VelqTM2lHPJi/3Wkle0p4pzWpEq70D8qZVp4TKLHMJCTQKpwUfopm5lvln87lc7w
4JDORIx/ed1u8MMTJlmG
=X3vc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'ext4_for_linue' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4
Pull ext4 fixes from Ted Ts'o:
"Fix a number of regression and other bugs in ext4, most of which were
relatively obscure cornercases or races that were found using
regression tests."
* tag 'ext4_for_linue' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (21 commits)
ext4: fix data=journal fast mount/umount hang
ext4: fix ext4_evict_inode() racing against workqueue processing code
ext4: fix memory leakage in mext_check_coverage
ext4: use s_extent_max_zeroout_kb value as number of kb
ext4: use atomic64_t for the per-flexbg free_clusters count
jbd2: fix use after free in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()
ext4: reserve metadata block for every delayed write
ext4: update reserved space after the 'correction'
ext4: do not use yield()
ext4: remove unused variable in ext4_free_blocks()
ext4: fix WARN_ON from ext4_releasepage()
ext4: fix the wrong number of the allocated blocks in ext4_split_extent()
ext4: update extent status tree after an extent is zeroed out
ext4: fix wrong m_len value after unwritten extent conversion
ext4: add self-testing infrastructure to do a sanity check
ext4: avoid a potential overflow in ext4_es_can_be_merged()
ext4: invalidate extent status tree during extent migration
ext4: remove unnecessary wait for extent conversion in ext4_fallocate()
ext4: add warning to ext4_convert_unwritten_extents_endio
ext4: disable merging of uninitialized extents
...
Currently when converting extent to initialized, we have to decide
whether to zeroout part/all of the uninitialized extent in order to
avoid extent tree growing rapidly.
The decision is made by comparing the size of the extent with the
configurable value s_extent_max_zeroout_kb which is in kibibytes units.
However when converting it to number of blocks we currently use it as it
was in bytes. This is obviously bug and it will result in ext4 _never_
zeroout extents, but rather always split and convert parts to
initialized while leaving the rest uninitialized in default setting.
Fix this by using s_extent_max_zeroout_kb as kibibytes.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Currently in ext4_ext_map_blocks() in delayed allocation writeback
we would update the reservation and after that check whether we claimed
cluster outside of the range of the allocation and if so, we'll give the
block back to the reservation pool.
However this also means that if the number of reserved data block
dropped to zero before the correction, we would release all the metadata
reservation as well, however we might still need it because the we're
not done with the delayed allocation and there might be more blocks to
come. This will result in error messages such as:
EXT4-fs warning (device sdb): ext4_da_update_reserve_space:361: ino 12,
allocated 1 with only 0 reserved metadata blocks (releasing 1 blocks
with reserved 1 data blocks)
This will only happen on bigalloc file system and it can be easily
reproduced using fiemap-tester from xfstests like this:
./src/fiemap-tester -m DHDHDHDHD -S -p0 /mnt/test/file
Or using xfstests such as 225.
Fix this by doing the correction first and updating the reservation
after that so that we do not accidentally decrease
i_reserved_data_blocks to zero.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
This commit fixes a wrong return value of the number of the allocated
blocks in ext4_split_extent. When the length of blocks we want to
allocate is greater than the length of the current extent, we return a
wrong number. Let's see what happens in the following case when we
call ext4_split_extent().
map: [48, 72]
ex: [32, 64, u]
'ex' will be split into two parts:
ex1: [32, 47, u]
ex2: [48, 64, w]
'map->m_len' is returned from this function, and the value is 24. But
the real length is 16. So it should be fixed.
Meanwhile in this commit we use right length of the allocated blocks
when get_reserved_cluster_alloc in ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents
is called.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
When we try to split an extent, this extent could be zeroed out and mark
as initialized. But we don't know this in ext4_map_blocks because it
only returns a length of allocated extent. Meanwhile we will mark this
extent as uninitialized because we only check m_flags.
This commit update extent status tree when we try to split an unwritten
extent. We don't need to worry about the status of this extent because
we always mark it as initialized.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
The ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents() function was assuming the
return value of ext4_ext_map_blocks() is equal to map->m_len. This
incorrect assumption was harmless until we started use status tree as
a extent cache because we need to update status tree according to
'm_len' value.
Meanwhile this commit marks EXT4_MAP_MAPPED flag after unwritten extent
conversion. It shouldn't cause a bug because we update status tree
according to checking EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag. But it should be fixed.
After applied this commit, the following error message from self-testing
infrastructure disappears.
...
kernel: ES len assertation failed for inode: 230 retval 1 !=
map->m_len 3 in ext4_map_blocks (allocation)
...
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Now that we don't merge uninitialized extents anymore,
ext4_fallocate() is free to operate on the inode while there are still
some extent conversions pending - it won't disturb them in any way.
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Splitting extents inside endio is a bad thing, but unfortunately it is
still possible. In fact we are pretty close to the moment when all
related issues will be fixed. Let's warn developer if it still the
case.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Derived from Jan's patch:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/36470
Merging of uninitialized extents creates all sorts of interesting race
possibilities when writeback / DIO races with fallocate. Thus
ext4_convert_unwritten_extents_endio() has to deal with a case where
extent to be converted needs to be split out first. That isn't nice
for two reasons:
1) It may need allocation of extent tree block so ENOSPC is possible.
2) It complicates end_io handling code
So we disable merging of uninitialized extents which allows us to simplify
the code. Extents will get merged after they are converted to initialized
ones.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
