snd_pcm_ops is no longer needed.
Let's use component driver callback.
*Note*
Only Intel skl-pcm has .get_time_info implementation, but ALSA SoC
framework doesn't call it so far.
To keep its implementation, this patch keeps .get_time_info,
but it is still not called.
Intel guy need to support it in the future.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o8yzaf2f.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current snd_soc_component_driver has pcm_new/pcm_free, but,
it doesn't have "component" at parameter.
Thus, each callback can't know it is called for which component.
Each callback currently is getting "component" by using
snd_soc_rtdcom_lookup() with driver name.
It works today, but, will not work in the future if we support multi
CPU/Codec/Platform, because 1 rtd might have multiple same driver
name component.
To solve this issue, each callback need to be called with component.
This patch adds new pcm_construct/pcm_destruct with "component"
parameter.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sgobaf3g.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current snd_soc_component_driver has snd_pcm_ops, and each driver can
have callback via it (1).
But, it is mainly created for ALSA, thus, it doesn't have "component"
as parameter for ALSA SoC (1)(2).
Thus, each callback can't know it is called for which component.
Thus, each callback currently is getting "component" by using
snd_soc_rtdcom_lookup() with driver name (3).
--- ALSA SoC ---
...
if (component->driver->ops &&
component->driver->ops->open)
(1) return component->driver->ops->open(substream);
...
--- driver ---
(2) static int xxx_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd = substream->private_data;
(3) struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_rtdcom_lookup(..);
...
}
It works today, but, will not work in the future if we support multi
CPU/Codec/Platform, because 1 rtd might have multiple components which
have same driver name.
To solve this issue, each callback needs to be called with component.
We already have many component driver callback.
This patch copies each snd_pcm_ops member under component driver,
and having "component" as parameter.
--- ALSA SoC ---
...
if (component->driver->open)
=> return component->driver->open(component, substream);
...
--- driver ---
=> static int xxx_open(struct snd_soc_component *component,
struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
...
}
*Note*
Only Intel skl-pcm has .get_time_info implementation, but ALSA SoC
framework doesn't call it so far.
To keep its implementation, this patch keeps .get_time_info,
but it is still not called.
Intel guy need to support it in the future.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tv8raf3r.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The snd_pcm_hw_constraint_minmax() works fine when a single codec is
connected to a single CPU DAI, but in multicodec or DPCM setup the
constraints placed by the driver will apply to the whole PCM stream (FE
included) and thus prevents more than 8 playback channels for example.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191008115720.7135-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
There are no return value checking when using kzalloc() and kcalloc() for
memory allocation. so add it.
Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Allow the user to select the workaround for TX2-219, and update
the silicon-errata.rst file to reflect this.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
As a PRFM instruction racing against a TTBR update can have undesirable
effects on TX2, NOP-out such PRFM on cores that are affected by
the TX2-219 erratum.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
It appears that the only case where we need to apply the TX2_219_TVM
mitigation is when the core is in SMT mode. So let's condition the
enabling on detecting a CPU whose MPIDR_EL1.Aff0 is non-zero.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
In order to workaround the TX2-219 erratum, it is necessary to trap
TTBRx_EL1 accesses to EL2. This is done by setting HCR_EL2.TVM on
guest entry, which has the side effect of trapping all the other
VM-related sysregs as well.
To minimize the overhead, a fast path is used so that we don't
have to go all the way back to the main sysreg handling code,
unless the rest of the hypervisor expects to see these accesses.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
GCC throws warning message as below:
‘clone_src_i_size’ may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
#define IS_ALIGNED(x, a) (((x) & ((typeof(x))(a) - 1)) == 0)
^
fs/btrfs/send.c:5088:6: note: ‘clone_src_i_size’ was declared here
u64 clone_src_i_size;
^
The clone_src_i_size is only used as call-by-reference
in a call to get_inode_info().
Silence the warning by initializing clone_src_i_size to 0.
Note that the warning is a false positive and reported by older versions
of GCC (eg. 7.x) but not eg 9.x. As there have been numerous people, the
patch is applied. Setting clone_src_i_size to 0 does not otherwise make
sense and would not do any action in case the code changes in the future.
Signed-off-by: Austin Kim <austindh.kim@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add note ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When lockdep is enabled, plugging Thunderbolt dock on Dominik's laptop
triggers following splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.3.0-rc6+ #1 Tainted: G T
------------------------------------------------------
pool-/usr/lib/b/1258 is trying to acquire lock:
000000005ab0ad43 (pci_rescan_remove_lock){+.+.}, at: authorized_store+0xe8/0x210
but task is already holding lock:
00000000bfb796b5 (&tb->lock){+.+.}, at: authorized_store+0x7c/0x210
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&tb->lock){+.+.}:
__mutex_lock+0xac/0x9a0
tb_domain_add+0x2d/0x130
nhi_probe+0x1dd/0x330
pci_device_probe+0xd2/0x150
really_probe+0xee/0x280
driver_probe_device+0x50/0xc0
bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xd0
__device_attach+0xe4/0x150
pci_bus_add_device+0x4e/0x70
pci_bus_add_devices+0x2e/0x66
pci_bus_add_devices+0x59/0x66
pci_bus_add_devices+0x59/0x66
enable_slot+0x344/0x450
acpiphp_check_bridge.part.0+0x119/0x150
acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0xaa/0x140
acpi_device_hotplug+0xa2/0x3f0
acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1a/0x30
process_one_work+0x234/0x580
worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0
kthread+0x10a/0x140
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
-> #0 (pci_rescan_remove_lock){+.+.}:
__lock_acquire+0xe54/0x1ac0
lock_acquire+0xb8/0x1b0
__mutex_lock+0xac/0x9a0
authorized_store+0xe8/0x210
kernfs_fop_write+0x125/0x1b0
vfs_write+0xc2/0x1d0
ksys_write+0x6c/0xf0
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x180
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&tb->lock);
lock(pci_rescan_remove_lock);
lock(&tb->lock);
lock(pci_rescan_remove_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
5 locks held by pool-/usr/lib/b/1258:
#0: 000000003df1a1ad (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60
#1: 0000000095a40b02 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x185/0x1d0
#2: 0000000017a7d714 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xf2/0x1b0
#3: 000000004f262981 (kn->count#208){.+.+}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xfa/0x1b0
#4: 00000000bfb796b5 (&tb->lock){+.+.}, at: authorized_store+0x7c/0x210
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 1258 Comm: pool-/usr/lib/b Tainted: G T 5.3.0-rc6+ #1
On an system using ACPI hotplug the host router gets hotplugged first and then
the firmware starts sending notifications about connected devices so the above
scenario should not happen in reality. However, after taking a second
look at commit a03e828915 ("thunderbolt: Serialize PCIe tunnel
creation with PCI rescan") that introduced the locking, I don't think it
is actually correct. It may have cured the symptom but probably the real
root cause was somewhere closer to PCI stack and possibly is already
fixed with recent kernels. I also tried to reproduce the original issue
with the commit reverted but could not.
So to keep lockdep happy and the code bit less complex drop calls to
pci_lock_rescan_remove()/pci_unlock_rescan_remove() in
tb_switch_set_authorized() effectively reverting a03e828915.
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/30/513
Fixes: a03e828915 ("thunderbolt: Serialize PCIe tunnel creation with PCI rescan")
Reported-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
When we discover existing DP tunnels the code checks whether DP IN
adapter port is enabled by calling tb_dp_port_is_enabled() before it
continues the discovery process. On Light Ridge (gen 1) controller
reading only the first dword of the DP IN config space causes subsequent
access to the same DP IN port path config space to fail or return
invalid data as can be seen in the below splat:
thunderbolt 0000:07:00.0: CFG_ERROR(0:d): Invalid config space or offset
Call Trace:
tb_cfg_read+0xb9/0xd0
__tb_path_deactivate_hop+0x98/0x210
tb_path_activate+0x228/0x7d0
tb_tunnel_restart+0x95/0x200
tb_handle_hotplug+0x30e/0x630
process_one_work+0x1b4/0x340
worker_thread+0x44/0x3d0
kthread+0xeb/0x120
? process_one_work+0x340/0x340
? kthread_park+0xa0/0xa0
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
If both DP In adapter config dwords are read in one go the issue does
not reproduce. This is likely firmware bug but we can work it around by
always reading the two dwords in one go. There should be no harm for
other controllers either so can do it unconditionally.
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/28/160
Reported-by: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>
Tested-by: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
