Pull x86 timer updates from Thomas Gleixner:
"Early TSC based time stamping to allow better boot time analysis.
This comes with a general cleanup of the TSC calibration code which
grew warts and duct taping over the years and removes 250 lines of
code. Initiated and mostly implemented by Pavel with help from various
folks"
* 'x86-timers-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (37 commits)
x86/kvmclock: Mark kvm_get_preset_lpj() as __init
x86/tsc: Consolidate init code
sched/clock: Disable interrupts when calling generic_sched_clock_init()
timekeeping: Prevent false warning when persistent clock is not available
sched/clock: Close a hole in sched_clock_init()
x86/tsc: Make use of tsc_calibrate_cpu_early()
x86/tsc: Split native_calibrate_cpu() into early and late parts
sched/clock: Use static key for sched_clock_running
sched/clock: Enable sched clock early
sched/clock: Move sched clock initialization and merge with generic clock
x86/tsc: Use TSC as sched clock early
x86/tsc: Initialize cyc2ns when tsc frequency is determined
x86/tsc: Calibrate tsc only once
ARM/time: Remove read_boot_clock64()
s390/time: Remove read_boot_clock64()
timekeeping: Default boot time offset to local_clock()
timekeeping: Replace read_boot_clock64() with read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset()
s390/time: Add read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset()
x86/xen/time: Output xen sched_clock time from 0
x86/xen/time: Initialize pv xen time in init_hypervisor_platform()
...
Pull locking/atomics update from Thomas Gleixner:
"The locking, atomics and memory model brains delivered:
- A larger update to the atomics code which reworks the ordering
barriers, consolidates the atomic primitives, provides the new
atomic64_fetch_add_unless() primitive and cleans up the include
hell.
- Simplify cmpxchg() instrumentation and add instrumentation for
xchg() and cmpxchg_double().
- Updates to the memory model and documentation"
* 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (48 commits)
locking/atomics: Rework ordering barriers
locking/atomics: Instrument cmpxchg_double*()
locking/atomics: Instrument xchg()
locking/atomics: Simplify cmpxchg() instrumentation
locking/atomics/x86: Reduce arch_cmpxchg64*() instrumentation
tools/memory-model: Rename litmus tests to comply to norm7
tools/memory-model/Documentation: Fix typo, smb->smp
sched/Documentation: Update wake_up() & co. memory-barrier guarantees
locking/spinlock, sched/core: Clarify requirements for smp_mb__after_spinlock()
sched/core: Use smp_mb() in wake_woken_function()
tools/memory-model: Add informal LKMM documentation to MAINTAINERS
locking/atomics/Documentation: Describe atomic_set() as a write operation
tools/memory-model: Make scripts executable
tools/memory-model: Remove ACCESS_ONCE() from model
tools/memory-model: Remove ACCESS_ONCE() from recipes
locking/memory-barriers.txt/kokr: Update Korean translation to fix broken DMA vs. MMIO ordering example
MAINTAINERS: Add Daniel Lustig as an LKMM reviewer
tools/memory-model: Fix ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce name
tools/memory-model: Add litmus test for full multicopy atomicity
locking/refcount: Always allow checked forms
...
Add a function calculate_sigpending to test to see if any signals are
pending for a new task immediately following fork. Signals have to
happen either before or after fork. Today our practice is to push
all of the signals to before the fork, but that has the downside that
frequent or periodic signals can make fork take much much longer than
normal or prevent fork from completing entirely.
So we need move signals that we can after the fork to prevent that.
This updates the code to set TIF_SIGPENDING on a new task if there
are signals or other activities that have moved so that they appear
to happen after the fork.
As the code today restarts if it sees any such activity this won't
immediately have an effect, as there will be no reason for it
to set TIF_SIGPENDING immediately after the fork.
Adding calculate_sigpending means the code in fork can safely be
changed to not always restart if a signal is pending.
The new calculate_sigpending function sets sigpending if there
are pending bits in jobctl, pending signals, the freezer needs
to freeze the new task or the live kernel patching framework
need the new thread to take the slow path to userspace.
I have verified that setting TIF_SIGPENDING does make a new process
take the slow path to userspace before it executes it's first userspace
instruction.
I have looked at the callers of signal_wake_up and the code paths
setting TIF_SIGPENDING and I don't see anything else that needs to be
handled. The code probably doesn't need to set TIF_SIGPENDING for the
kernel live patching as it uses a separate thread flag as well. But
at this point it seems safer reuse the recalc_sigpending logic and get
the kernel live patching folks to sort out their story later.
V2: I have moved the test into schedule_tail where siglock can
be grabbed and recalc_sigpending can be reused directly.
Further as the last action of setting up a new task this
guarantees that TIF_SIGPENDING will be properly set in the
new process.
The helper calculate_sigpending takes the siglock and
uncontitionally sets TIF_SIGPENDING and let's recalc_sigpending
clear TIF_SIGPENDING if it is unnecessary. This allows reusing
the existing code and keeps maintenance of the conditions simple.
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> suggested the movement
and pointed out the need to take siglock if this code
was going to be called while the new task is discoverable.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This patch detaches the preemptirq tracepoints from the tracers and
keeps it separate.
Advantages:
* Lockdep and irqsoff event can now run in parallel since they no longer
have their own calls.
* This unifies the usecase of adding hooks to an irqsoff and irqson
event, and a preemptoff and preempton event.
3 users of the events exist:
- Lockdep
- irqsoff and preemptoff tracers
- irqs and preempt trace events
The unification cleans up several ifdefs and makes the code in preempt
tracer and irqsoff tracers simpler. It gets rid of all the horrific
ifdeferry around PROVE_LOCKING and makes configuration of the different
users of the tracepoints more easy and understandable. It also gets rid
of the time_* function calls from the lockdep hooks used to call into
the preemptirq tracer which is not needed anymore. The negative delta in
lines of code in this patch is quite large too.
In the patch we introduce a new CONFIG option PREEMPTIRQ_TRACEPOINTS
as a single point for registering probes onto the tracepoints. With
this,
the web of config options for preempt/irq toggle tracepoints and its
users becomes:
PREEMPT_TRACER PREEMPTIRQ_EVENTS IRQSOFF_TRACER PROVE_LOCKING
| | \ | |
\ (selects) / \ \ (selects) /
TRACE_PREEMPT_TOGGLE ----> TRACE_IRQFLAGS
\ /
\ (depends on) /
PREEMPTIRQ_TRACEPOINTS
Other than the performance tests mentioned in the previous patch, I also
ran the locking API test suite. I verified that all tests cases are
passing.
I also injected issues by not registering lockdep probes onto the
tracepoints and I see failures to confirm that the probes are indeed
working.
This series + lockdep probes not registered (just to inject errors):
[ 0.000000] hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.000000] soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/12:FAILED|FAILED| ok |
[ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/21:FAILED|FAILED| ok |
[ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/12:FAILED|FAILED| ok |
[ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/12:FAILED|FAILED| ok |
[ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/21:FAILED|FAILED| ok |
[ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/21:FAILED|FAILED| ok |
[ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok |
With this series + lockdep probes registered, all locking tests pass:
[ 0.000000] hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.000000] soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok |
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180730222423.196630-4-joel@joelfernandes.org
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
sched_clock_init() used be called early during boot when interrupts were
still disabled. After the recent changes to utilize sched clock early the
sched_clock_init() call happens when interrupts are already enabled, which
triggers the following warning:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/time/sched_clock.c:180 sched_clock_register+0x44/0x278
[<c001a13c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c052367c>] (sched_clock_register+0x44/0x278)
[<c052367c>] (sched_clock_register) from [<c05238d8>] (generic_sched_clock_init+0x28/0x88)
[<c05238d8>] (generic_sched_clock_init) from [<c0521a00>] (sched_clock_init+0x54/0x74)
[<c0521a00>] (sched_clock_init) from [<c0519c18>] (start_kernel+0x310/0x3e4)
[<c0519c18>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null))
Disable IRQs for the duration of generic_sched_clock_init().
Fixes: 857baa87b6 ("sched/clock: Enable sched clock early")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: steven.sistare@oracle.com
Cc: daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180730135252.24599-1-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com
task_numa_find_cpu() helps to find the CPU to swap/move the task to.
It's guarded by numa_has_capacity(). However node not having capacity
shouldn't deter a task swapping if it helps NUMA placement.
Further load_too_imbalanced(), which evaluates possibilities of move/swap,
provides similar checks as numa_has_capacity.
Hence remove numa_has_capacity() to enhance possibilities of task
swapping even if load is imbalanced.
Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM
JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE
16 25657.9 25804.1 0.569
1 74435 73413 -1.37
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-13-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
There are checks in migrate_swap_stop() that check if the task/CPU
combination is as per migrate_swap_arg before migrating.
However atleast one of the two tasks to be swapped by migrate_swap() could
have migrated to a completely different CPU before updating the
migrate_swap_arg. The new CPU where the task is currently running could
be a different node too. If the task has migrated, numa balancer might
end up placing a task in a wrong node. Instead of achieving node
consolidation, it may end up spreading the load across nodes.
To avoid that pass the CPUs as additional parameters.
While here, place migrate_swap under CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING.
Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM
JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE
16 25377.3 25226.6 -0.59
1 72287 73326 1.437
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-10-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Currently preferred node is set to dst_nid which is the last node in the
iteration whose group weight or task weight is greater than the current
node. However it doesn't guarantee that dst_nid has the numa capacity
to move. It also doesn't guarantee that dst_nid has the best_cpu which
is the CPU/node ideal for node migration.
Lets consider faults on a 4 node system with group weight numbers
in different nodes being in 0 < 1 < 2 < 3 proportion. Consider the task
is running on 3 and 0 is its preferred node but its capacity is full.
Consider nodes 1, 2 and 3 have capacity. Then the task should be
migrated to node 1. Currently the task gets moved to node 2. env.dst_nid
points to the last node whose faults were greater than current node.
Modify to set the preferred node based of best_cpu. Earlier setting
preferred node was skipped if nr_active_nodes is 1. This could result in
the task being moved out of the preferred node to a random node during
regular load balancing.
Also while modifying task_numa_migrate(), use sched_setnuma to set
preferred node. This ensures out numa accounting is correct.
Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM
JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE
16 25122.9 25549.6 1.698
1 73850 73190 -0.89
Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM
JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE
8 105930 113437 7.08676
1 178624 196130 9.80047
(numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5)
Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev
numa01.sh Real: 435.78 653.81 534.58 83.20
numa01.sh Sys: 121.93 187.18 145.90 23.47
numa01.sh User: 37082.81 51402.80 43647.60 5409.75
numa02.sh Real: 60.64 61.63 61.19 0.40
numa02.sh Sys: 14.72 25.68 19.06 4.03
numa02.sh User: 5210.95 5266.69 5233.30 20.82
numa03.sh Real: 746.51 808.24 780.36 23.88
numa03.sh Sys: 97.26 108.48 105.07 4.28
numa03.sh User: 58956.30 61397.05 60162.95 1050.82
numa04.sh Real: 465.97 519.27 484.81 19.62
numa04.sh Sys: 304.43 359.08 334.68 20.64
numa04.sh User: 37544.16 41186.15 39262.44 1314.91
numa05.sh Real: 411.57 457.20 433.29 16.58
numa05.sh Sys: 230.05 435.48 339.95 67.58
numa05.sh User: 33325.54 36896.31 35637.84 1222.64
Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change
numa01.sh Real: 506.35 794.46 599.06 104.26 -10.76%
numa01.sh Sys: 150.37 223.56 195.99 24.94 -25.55%
numa01.sh User: 43450.69 61752.04 49281.50 6635.33 -11.43%
numa02.sh Real: 60.33 62.40 61.31 0.90 -0.195%
numa02.sh Sys: 18.12 31.66 24.28 5.89 -21.49%
numa02.sh User: 5203.91 5325.32 5260.29 49.98 -0.513%
numa03.sh Real: 696.47 853.62 745.80 57.28 4.6339%
numa03.sh Sys: 85.68 123.71 97.89 13.48 7.3347%
numa03.sh User: 55978.45 66418.63 59254.94 3737.97 1.5323%
numa04.sh Real: 444.05 514.83 497.06 26.85 -2.464%
numa04.sh Sys: 230.39 375.79 316.23 48.58 5.8343%
numa04.sh User: 35403.12 41004.10 39720.80 2163.08 -1.153%
numa05.sh Real: 423.09 460.41 439.57 13.92 -1.428%
numa05.sh Sys: 287.38 480.15 369.37 68.52 -7.964%
numa05.sh User: 34732.12 38016.80 36255.85 1070.51 -1.704%
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-5-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Currently load_too_imbalance() cares about the slope of imbalance.
It doesn't care of the direction of the imbalance.
However this may not work if nodes that are being compared have
dissimilar capacities. Few nodes might have more cores than other nodes
in the system. Also unlike traditional load balance at a NUMA sched
domain, multiple requests to migrate from the same source node to same
destination node may run in parallel. This can cause huge load
imbalance. This is specially true on a larger machines with either large
cores per node or more number of nodes in the system. Hence allow
move/swap only if the imbalance is going to reduce.
Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM
JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE
16 25058.2 25122.9 0.25
1 72950 73850 1.23
(numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5)
Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev
numa01.sh Real: 516.14 892.41 739.84 151.32
numa01.sh Sys: 153.16 192.99 177.70 14.58
numa01.sh User: 39821.04 69528.92 57193.87 10989.48
numa02.sh Real: 60.91 62.35 61.58 0.63
numa02.sh Sys: 16.47 26.16 21.20 3.85
numa02.sh User: 5227.58 5309.61 5265.17 31.04
numa03.sh Real: 739.07 917.73 795.75 64.45
numa03.sh Sys: 94.46 136.08 109.48 14.58
numa03.sh User: 57478.56 72014.09 61764.48 5343.69
numa04.sh Real: 442.61 715.43 530.31 96.12
numa04.sh Sys: 224.90 348.63 285.61 48.83
numa04.sh User: 35836.84 47522.47 40235.41 3985.26
numa05.sh Real: 386.13 489.17 434.94 43.59
numa05.sh Sys: 144.29 438.56 278.80 105.78
numa05.sh User: 33255.86 36890.82 34879.31 1641.98
Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change
numa01.sh Real: 435.78 653.81 534.58 83.20 38.39%
numa01.sh Sys: 121.93 187.18 145.90 23.47 21.79%
numa01.sh User: 37082.81 51402.80 43647.60 5409.75 31.03%
numa02.sh Real: 60.64 61.63 61.19 0.40 0.637%
numa02.sh Sys: 14.72 25.68 19.06 4.03 11.22%
numa02.sh User: 5210.95 5266.69 5233.30 20.82 0.608%
numa03.sh Real: 746.51 808.24 780.36 23.88 1.972%
numa03.sh Sys: 97.26 108.48 105.07 4.28 4.197%
numa03.sh User: 58956.30 61397.05 60162.95 1050.82 2.661%
numa04.sh Real: 465.97 519.27 484.81 19.62 9.385%
numa04.sh Sys: 304.43 359.08 334.68 20.64 -14.6%
numa04.sh User: 37544.16 41186.15 39262.44 1314.91 2.478%
numa05.sh Real: 411.57 457.20 433.29 16.58 0.380%
numa05.sh Sys: 230.05 435.48 339.95 67.58 -17.9%
numa05.sh User: 33325.54 36896.31 35637.84 1222.64 -2.12%
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-4-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Although we can rely on cpuacct to present the CPU usage of task
groups, it is hard to tell how intense the competition is between
these groups on CPU resources.
Monitoring the wait time or sched_debug of each process could be
very expensive, and there is no good way to accurately represent the
conflict with these info, we need the wait time on group dimension.
Thus we introduce group's wait_sum to represent the resource conflict
between task groups, which is simply the sum of the wait time of
the group's cfs_rq.
The 'cpu.stat' is modified to show the statistic, like:
nr_periods 0
nr_throttled 0
throttled_time 0
wait_sum 2035098795584
Now we can monitor the changes of wait_sum to tell how much a
a task group is suffering in the fight of CPU resources.
For example:
(wait_sum - last_wait_sum) * 100 / (nr_cpu * period_ns) == X%
means the task group paid X percentage of period on waiting
for the CPU.
Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ff7dae3b-e5f9-7157-1caa-ff02c6b23dc1@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
NO_RT_RUNTIME_SHARE feature is used to prevent a CPU borrow enough
runtime with a spin-rt-task.
However, if RT_RUNTIME_SHARE feature is enabled and rt_rq has borrowd
enough rt_runtime at the beginning, rt_runtime can't be restored to
its initial bandwidth rt_runtime after we disable RT_RUNTIME_SHARE.
E.g. on my PC with 4 cores, procedure to reproduce:
1) Make sure RT_RUNTIME_SHARE is enabled
cat /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features
GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS START_DEBIT NO_NEXT_BUDDY LAST_BUDDY
CACHE_HOT_BUDDY WAKEUP_PREEMPTION NO_HRTICK NO_DOUBLE_TICK
LB_BIAS NONTASK_CAPACITY TTWU_QUEUE NO_SIS_AVG_CPU SIS_PROP
NO_WARN_DOUBLE_CLOCK RT_PUSH_IPI RT_RUNTIME_SHARE NO_LB_MIN
ATTACH_AGE_LOAD WA_IDLE WA_WEIGHT WA_BIAS
2) Start a spin-rt-task
./loop_rr &
3) set affinity to the last cpu
taskset -p 8 $pid_of_loop_rr
4) Observe that last cpu have borrowed enough runtime.
cat /proc/sched_debug | grep rt_runtime
.rt_runtime : 950.000000
.rt_runtime : 900.000000
.rt_runtime : 950.000000
.rt_runtime : 1000.000000
5) Disable RT_RUNTIME_SHARE
echo NO_RT_RUNTIME_SHARE > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features
6) Observe that rt_runtime can not been restored
cat /proc/sched_debug | grep rt_runtime
.rt_runtime : 950.000000
.rt_runtime : 900.000000
.rt_runtime : 950.000000
.rt_runtime : 1000.000000
This patch help to restore rt_runtime after we disable
RT_RUNTIME_SHARE.
Signed-off-by: Hailong Liu <liu.hailong6@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: zhong.weidong@zte.com.cn
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1531874815-39357-1-git-send-email-liu.hailong6@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
get_cpu() disables preemption for the entire sched_fork() function.
This get_cpu() was introduced in commit:
dd41f596cd ("sched: cfs core code")
... which also invoked sched_balance_self() and this function
required preemption do be off.
Today, sched_balance_self() seems to be moved to ->task_fork callback
which is invoked while the ->pi_lock is held.
set_load_weight() could invoke reweight_task() which then via $callchain
might end up in smp_processor_id() but since `update_load' is false
this won't happen.
I didn't find any this_cpu*() or similar usage during the initialisation
of the task_struct.
The `cpu' value (from get_cpu()) is only used later in __set_task_cpu()
while the ->pi_lock lock is held.
Based on this it is possible to remove get_cpu() and use
smp_processor_id() for the `cpu' variable without breaking anything.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180706130615.g2ex2kmfu5kcvlq6@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Mark noticed that syzkaller is able to reliably trigger the following warning:
dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 153 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:124 switched_from_dl+0x454/0x608
Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...
CPU: 1 PID: 153 Comm: syz-executor253 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc3+ #29
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x458
show_stack+0x20/0x30
dump_stack+0x180/0x250
panic+0x2dc/0x4ec
__warn_printk+0x0/0x150
report_bug+0x228/0x2d8
bug_handler+0xa0/0x1a0
brk_handler+0x2f0/0x568
do_debug_exception+0x1bc/0x5d0
el1_dbg+0x18/0x78
switched_from_dl+0x454/0x608
__sched_setscheduler+0x8cc/0x2018
sys_sched_setattr+0x340/0x758
el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34
syzkaller reproducer runs a bunch of threads that constantly switch
between DEADLINE and NORMAL classes while interacting through futexes.
The splat above is caused by the fact that if a DEADLINE task is setattr
back to NORMAL while in non_contending state (blocked on a futex -
inactive timer armed), its contribution to running_bw is not removed
before sub_rq_bw() gets called (!task_on_rq_queued() branch) and the
latter sees running_bw > this_bw.
Fix it by removing a task contribution from running_bw if the task is
not queued and in non_contending state while switched to a different
class.
Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180711072948.27061-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Gaurav reports that commit:
85f1abe001 ("kthread, sched/wait: Fix kthread_parkme() completion issue")
isn't working for him. Because of the following race:
> controller Thread CPUHP Thread
> takedown_cpu
> kthread_park
> kthread_parkme
> Set KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK
> smpboot_thread_fn
> set Task interruptible
>
>
> wake_up_process
> if (!(p->state & state))
> goto out;
>
> Kthread_parkme
> SET TASK_PARKED
> schedule
> raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)
> ttwu_remote
> waiting for __task_rq_lock
> context_switch
>
> finish_lock_switch
>
>
>
> Case TASK_PARKED
> kthread_park_complete
>
>
> SET Running
Furthermore, Oleg noticed that the whole scheduler TASK_PARKED
handling is buggered because the TASK_DEAD thing is done with
preemption disabled, the current code can still complete early on
preemption :/
So basically revert that earlier fix and go with a variant of the
alternative mentioned in the commit. Promote TASK_PARKED to special
state to avoid the store-store issue on task->state leading to the
WARN in kthread_unpark() -> __kthread_bind().
But in addition, add wait_task_inactive() to kthread_park() to ensure
the task really is PARKED when we return from kthread_park(). This
avoids the whole kthread still gets migrated nonsense -- although it
would be really good to get this done differently.
Reported-by: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 85f1abe001 ("kthread, sched/wait: Fix kthread_parkme() completion issue")
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
When a cfs_rq is throttled, parent cfs_rq->nr_running is decreased and
everything happens at cfs_rq level. Currently util_est stays unchanged
in such case and it keeps accounting the utilization of throttled tasks.
This can somewhat make sense as we don't dequeue tasks but only throttled
cfs_rq.
If a task of another group is enqueued/dequeued and root cfs_rq becomes
idle during the dequeue, util_est will be cleared whereas it was
accounting util_est of throttled tasks before. So the behavior of util_est
is not always the same regarding throttled tasks and depends of side
activity. Furthermore, util_est will not be updated when the cfs_rq is
unthrottled as everything happens at cfs_rq level. Main results is that
util_est will stay null whereas we now have running tasks. We have to wait
for the next dequeue/enqueue of the previously throttled tasks to get an
up to date util_est.
Remove the assumption that cfs_rq's estimated utilization of a CPU is 0
if there is no running task so the util_est of a task remains until the
latter is dequeued even if its cfs_rq has been throttled.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 7f65ea42eb ("sched/fair: Add util_est on top of PELT")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1528972380-16268-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
