Currently preferred node is set to dst_nid which is the last node in the
iteration whose group weight or task weight is greater than the current
node. However it doesn't guarantee that dst_nid has the numa capacity
to move. It also doesn't guarantee that dst_nid has the best_cpu which
is the CPU/node ideal for node migration.
Lets consider faults on a 4 node system with group weight numbers
in different nodes being in 0 < 1 < 2 < 3 proportion. Consider the task
is running on 3 and 0 is its preferred node but its capacity is full.
Consider nodes 1, 2 and 3 have capacity. Then the task should be
migrated to node 1. Currently the task gets moved to node 2. env.dst_nid
points to the last node whose faults were greater than current node.
Modify to set the preferred node based of best_cpu. Earlier setting
preferred node was skipped if nr_active_nodes is 1. This could result in
the task being moved out of the preferred node to a random node during
regular load balancing.
Also while modifying task_numa_migrate(), use sched_setnuma to set
preferred node. This ensures out numa accounting is correct.
Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM
JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE
16 25122.9 25549.6 1.698
1 73850 73190 -0.89
Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM
JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE
8 105930 113437 7.08676
1 178624 196130 9.80047
(numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5)
Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev
numa01.sh Real: 435.78 653.81 534.58 83.20
numa01.sh Sys: 121.93 187.18 145.90 23.47
numa01.sh User: 37082.81 51402.80 43647.60 5409.75
numa02.sh Real: 60.64 61.63 61.19 0.40
numa02.sh Sys: 14.72 25.68 19.06 4.03
numa02.sh User: 5210.95 5266.69 5233.30 20.82
numa03.sh Real: 746.51 808.24 780.36 23.88
numa03.sh Sys: 97.26 108.48 105.07 4.28
numa03.sh User: 58956.30 61397.05 60162.95 1050.82
numa04.sh Real: 465.97 519.27 484.81 19.62
numa04.sh Sys: 304.43 359.08 334.68 20.64
numa04.sh User: 37544.16 41186.15 39262.44 1314.91
numa05.sh Real: 411.57 457.20 433.29 16.58
numa05.sh Sys: 230.05 435.48 339.95 67.58
numa05.sh User: 33325.54 36896.31 35637.84 1222.64
Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change
numa01.sh Real: 506.35 794.46 599.06 104.26 -10.76%
numa01.sh Sys: 150.37 223.56 195.99 24.94 -25.55%
numa01.sh User: 43450.69 61752.04 49281.50 6635.33 -11.43%
numa02.sh Real: 60.33 62.40 61.31 0.90 -0.195%
numa02.sh Sys: 18.12 31.66 24.28 5.89 -21.49%
numa02.sh User: 5203.91 5325.32 5260.29 49.98 -0.513%
numa03.sh Real: 696.47 853.62 745.80 57.28 4.6339%
numa03.sh Sys: 85.68 123.71 97.89 13.48 7.3347%
numa03.sh User: 55978.45 66418.63 59254.94 3737.97 1.5323%
numa04.sh Real: 444.05 514.83 497.06 26.85 -2.464%
numa04.sh Sys: 230.39 375.79 316.23 48.58 5.8343%
numa04.sh User: 35403.12 41004.10 39720.80 2163.08 -1.153%
numa05.sh Real: 423.09 460.41 439.57 13.92 -1.428%
numa05.sh Sys: 287.38 480.15 369.37 68.52 -7.964%
numa05.sh User: 34732.12 38016.80 36255.85 1070.51 -1.704%
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-5-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Currently load_too_imbalance() cares about the slope of imbalance.
It doesn't care of the direction of the imbalance.
However this may not work if nodes that are being compared have
dissimilar capacities. Few nodes might have more cores than other nodes
in the system. Also unlike traditional load balance at a NUMA sched
domain, multiple requests to migrate from the same source node to same
destination node may run in parallel. This can cause huge load
imbalance. This is specially true on a larger machines with either large
cores per node or more number of nodes in the system. Hence allow
move/swap only if the imbalance is going to reduce.
Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM
JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE
16 25058.2 25122.9 0.25
1 72950 73850 1.23
(numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5)
Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev
numa01.sh Real: 516.14 892.41 739.84 151.32
numa01.sh Sys: 153.16 192.99 177.70 14.58
numa01.sh User: 39821.04 69528.92 57193.87 10989.48
numa02.sh Real: 60.91 62.35 61.58 0.63
numa02.sh Sys: 16.47 26.16 21.20 3.85
numa02.sh User: 5227.58 5309.61 5265.17 31.04
numa03.sh Real: 739.07 917.73 795.75 64.45
numa03.sh Sys: 94.46 136.08 109.48 14.58
numa03.sh User: 57478.56 72014.09 61764.48 5343.69
numa04.sh Real: 442.61 715.43 530.31 96.12
numa04.sh Sys: 224.90 348.63 285.61 48.83
numa04.sh User: 35836.84 47522.47 40235.41 3985.26
numa05.sh Real: 386.13 489.17 434.94 43.59
numa05.sh Sys: 144.29 438.56 278.80 105.78
numa05.sh User: 33255.86 36890.82 34879.31 1641.98
Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change
numa01.sh Real: 435.78 653.81 534.58 83.20 38.39%
numa01.sh Sys: 121.93 187.18 145.90 23.47 21.79%
numa01.sh User: 37082.81 51402.80 43647.60 5409.75 31.03%
numa02.sh Real: 60.64 61.63 61.19 0.40 0.637%
numa02.sh Sys: 14.72 25.68 19.06 4.03 11.22%
numa02.sh User: 5210.95 5266.69 5233.30 20.82 0.608%
numa03.sh Real: 746.51 808.24 780.36 23.88 1.972%
numa03.sh Sys: 97.26 108.48 105.07 4.28 4.197%
numa03.sh User: 58956.30 61397.05 60162.95 1050.82 2.661%
numa04.sh Real: 465.97 519.27 484.81 19.62 9.385%
numa04.sh Sys: 304.43 359.08 334.68 20.64 -14.6%
numa04.sh User: 37544.16 41186.15 39262.44 1314.91 2.478%
numa05.sh Real: 411.57 457.20 433.29 16.58 0.380%
numa05.sh Sys: 230.05 435.48 339.95 67.58 -17.9%
numa05.sh User: 33325.54 36896.31 35637.84 1222.64 -2.12%
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-4-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Although we can rely on cpuacct to present the CPU usage of task
groups, it is hard to tell how intense the competition is between
these groups on CPU resources.
Monitoring the wait time or sched_debug of each process could be
very expensive, and there is no good way to accurately represent the
conflict with these info, we need the wait time on group dimension.
Thus we introduce group's wait_sum to represent the resource conflict
between task groups, which is simply the sum of the wait time of
the group's cfs_rq.
The 'cpu.stat' is modified to show the statistic, like:
nr_periods 0
nr_throttled 0
throttled_time 0
wait_sum 2035098795584
Now we can monitor the changes of wait_sum to tell how much a
a task group is suffering in the fight of CPU resources.
For example:
(wait_sum - last_wait_sum) * 100 / (nr_cpu * period_ns) == X%
means the task group paid X percentage of period on waiting
for the CPU.
Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ff7dae3b-e5f9-7157-1caa-ff02c6b23dc1@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
NO_RT_RUNTIME_SHARE feature is used to prevent a CPU borrow enough
runtime with a spin-rt-task.
However, if RT_RUNTIME_SHARE feature is enabled and rt_rq has borrowd
enough rt_runtime at the beginning, rt_runtime can't be restored to
its initial bandwidth rt_runtime after we disable RT_RUNTIME_SHARE.
E.g. on my PC with 4 cores, procedure to reproduce:
1) Make sure RT_RUNTIME_SHARE is enabled
cat /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features
GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS START_DEBIT NO_NEXT_BUDDY LAST_BUDDY
CACHE_HOT_BUDDY WAKEUP_PREEMPTION NO_HRTICK NO_DOUBLE_TICK
LB_BIAS NONTASK_CAPACITY TTWU_QUEUE NO_SIS_AVG_CPU SIS_PROP
NO_WARN_DOUBLE_CLOCK RT_PUSH_IPI RT_RUNTIME_SHARE NO_LB_MIN
ATTACH_AGE_LOAD WA_IDLE WA_WEIGHT WA_BIAS
2) Start a spin-rt-task
./loop_rr &
3) set affinity to the last cpu
taskset -p 8 $pid_of_loop_rr
4) Observe that last cpu have borrowed enough runtime.
cat /proc/sched_debug | grep rt_runtime
.rt_runtime : 950.000000
.rt_runtime : 900.000000
.rt_runtime : 950.000000
.rt_runtime : 1000.000000
5) Disable RT_RUNTIME_SHARE
echo NO_RT_RUNTIME_SHARE > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features
6) Observe that rt_runtime can not been restored
cat /proc/sched_debug | grep rt_runtime
.rt_runtime : 950.000000
.rt_runtime : 900.000000
.rt_runtime : 950.000000
.rt_runtime : 1000.000000
This patch help to restore rt_runtime after we disable
RT_RUNTIME_SHARE.
Signed-off-by: Hailong Liu <liu.hailong6@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: zhong.weidong@zte.com.cn
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1531874815-39357-1-git-send-email-liu.hailong6@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
get_cpu() disables preemption for the entire sched_fork() function.
This get_cpu() was introduced in commit:
dd41f596cd ("sched: cfs core code")
... which also invoked sched_balance_self() and this function
required preemption do be off.
Today, sched_balance_self() seems to be moved to ->task_fork callback
which is invoked while the ->pi_lock is held.
set_load_weight() could invoke reweight_task() which then via $callchain
might end up in smp_processor_id() but since `update_load' is false
this won't happen.
I didn't find any this_cpu*() or similar usage during the initialisation
of the task_struct.
The `cpu' value (from get_cpu()) is only used later in __set_task_cpu()
while the ->pi_lock lock is held.
Based on this it is possible to remove get_cpu() and use
smp_processor_id() for the `cpu' variable without breaking anything.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180706130615.g2ex2kmfu5kcvlq6@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Mark noticed that syzkaller is able to reliably trigger the following warning:
dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 153 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:124 switched_from_dl+0x454/0x608
Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...
CPU: 1 PID: 153 Comm: syz-executor253 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc3+ #29
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x458
show_stack+0x20/0x30
dump_stack+0x180/0x250
panic+0x2dc/0x4ec
__warn_printk+0x0/0x150
report_bug+0x228/0x2d8
bug_handler+0xa0/0x1a0
brk_handler+0x2f0/0x568
do_debug_exception+0x1bc/0x5d0
el1_dbg+0x18/0x78
switched_from_dl+0x454/0x608
__sched_setscheduler+0x8cc/0x2018
sys_sched_setattr+0x340/0x758
el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34
syzkaller reproducer runs a bunch of threads that constantly switch
between DEADLINE and NORMAL classes while interacting through futexes.
The splat above is caused by the fact that if a DEADLINE task is setattr
back to NORMAL while in non_contending state (blocked on a futex -
inactive timer armed), its contribution to running_bw is not removed
before sub_rq_bw() gets called (!task_on_rq_queued() branch) and the
latter sees running_bw > this_bw.
Fix it by removing a task contribution from running_bw if the task is
not queued and in non_contending state while switched to a different
class.
Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180711072948.27061-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Gaurav reports that commit:
85f1abe001 ("kthread, sched/wait: Fix kthread_parkme() completion issue")
isn't working for him. Because of the following race:
> controller Thread CPUHP Thread
> takedown_cpu
> kthread_park
> kthread_parkme
> Set KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK
> smpboot_thread_fn
> set Task interruptible
>
>
> wake_up_process
> if (!(p->state & state))
> goto out;
>
> Kthread_parkme
> SET TASK_PARKED
> schedule
> raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)
> ttwu_remote
> waiting for __task_rq_lock
> context_switch
>
> finish_lock_switch
>
>
>
> Case TASK_PARKED
> kthread_park_complete
>
>
> SET Running
Furthermore, Oleg noticed that the whole scheduler TASK_PARKED
handling is buggered because the TASK_DEAD thing is done with
preemption disabled, the current code can still complete early on
preemption :/
So basically revert that earlier fix and go with a variant of the
alternative mentioned in the commit. Promote TASK_PARKED to special
state to avoid the store-store issue on task->state leading to the
WARN in kthread_unpark() -> __kthread_bind().
But in addition, add wait_task_inactive() to kthread_park() to ensure
the task really is PARKED when we return from kthread_park(). This
avoids the whole kthread still gets migrated nonsense -- although it
would be really good to get this done differently.
Reported-by: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 85f1abe001 ("kthread, sched/wait: Fix kthread_parkme() completion issue")
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
When a cfs_rq is throttled, parent cfs_rq->nr_running is decreased and
everything happens at cfs_rq level. Currently util_est stays unchanged
in such case and it keeps accounting the utilization of throttled tasks.
This can somewhat make sense as we don't dequeue tasks but only throttled
cfs_rq.
If a task of another group is enqueued/dequeued and root cfs_rq becomes
idle during the dequeue, util_est will be cleared whereas it was
accounting util_est of throttled tasks before. So the behavior of util_est
is not always the same regarding throttled tasks and depends of side
activity. Furthermore, util_est will not be updated when the cfs_rq is
unthrottled as everything happens at cfs_rq level. Main results is that
util_est will stay null whereas we now have running tasks. We have to wait
for the next dequeue/enqueue of the previously throttled tasks to get an
up to date util_est.
Remove the assumption that cfs_rq's estimated utilization of a CPU is 0
if there is no running task so the util_est of a task remains until the
latter is dequeued even if its cfs_rq has been throttled.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 7f65ea42eb ("sched/fair: Add util_est on top of PELT")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1528972380-16268-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
I noticed that cgroup task groups constantly get throttled even
if they have low CPU usage, this causes some jitters on the response
time to some of our business containers when enabling CPU quotas.
It's very simple to reproduce:
mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/test
cd /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/test
echo 100000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us
echo $$ > tasks
then repeat:
cat cpu.stat | grep nr_throttled # nr_throttled will increase steadily
After some analysis, we found that cfs_rq::runtime_remaining will
be cleared by expire_cfs_rq_runtime() due to two equal but stale
"cfs_{b|q}->runtime_expires" after period timer is re-armed.
The current condition to judge clock drift in expire_cfs_rq_runtime()
is wrong, the two runtime_expires are actually the same when clock
drift happens, so this condtion can never hit. The orginal design was
correctly done by this commit:
a9cf55b286 ("sched: Expire invalid runtime")
... but was changed to be the current implementation due to its locking bug.
This patch introduces another way, it adds a new field in both structures
cfs_rq and cfs_bandwidth to record the expiration update sequence, and
uses them to figure out if clock drift happens (true if they are equal).
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 51f2176d74 ("sched/fair: Fix unlocked reads of some cfs_b->quota/period")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180620101834.24455-1-xlpang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
With commit:
8f111bc357 ("cpufreq/schedutil: Rewrite CPUFREQ_RT support")
the schedutil governor uses rq->rt.rt_nr_running to detect whether an
RT task is currently running on the CPU and to set frequency to max
if necessary.
cpufreq_update_util() is called in enqueue/dequeue_top_rt_rq() but
rq->rt.rt_nr_running has not been updated yet when dequeue_top_rt_rq() is
called so schedutil still considers that an RT task is running when the
last task is dequeued. The update of rq->rt.rt_nr_running happens later
in dequeue_rt_stack().
In fact, we can take advantage of the sequence that the dequeue then
re-enqueue rt entities when a rt task is enqueued or dequeued;
As a result enqueue_top_rt_rq() is always called when a task is
enqueued or dequeued and also when groups are throttled or unthrottled.
The only place that not use enqueue_top_rt_rq() is when root rt_rq is
throttled.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: efault@gmx.de
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com
Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Fixes: 8f111bc357 ('cpufreq/schedutil: Rewrite CPUFREQ_RT support')
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1530021202-21695-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Some people have reported that the warning in sched_tick_remote()
occasionally triggers, especially in favour of some RCU-Torture
pressure:
WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 906 at kernel/sched/core.c:3138 sched_tick_remote+0xb6/0xc0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 11 PID: 906 Comm: kworker/u32:3 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc2+ #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events_unbound sched_tick_remote
RIP: 0010:sched_tick_remote+0xb6/0xc0
Code: e8 0f 06 b8 00 c6 03 00 fb eb 9d 8b 43 04 85 c0 75 8d 48 8b 83 e0 0a 00 00 48 85 c0 75 81 eb 88 48 89 df e8 bc fe ff ff eb aa <0f> 0b eb
+c5 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 bf 17 00 00 00 e8 b6 2e fe ff 0f b6
Call Trace:
process_one_work+0x1df/0x3b0
worker_thread+0x44/0x3d0
kthread+0xf3/0x130
? set_worker_desc+0xb0/0xb0
? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
This happens when the remote tick applies on an idle task. Usually the
idle_cpu() check avoids that, but it is performed before we lock the
runqueue and it is therefore racy. It was intended to be that way in
order to prevent from useless runqueue locks since idle task tick
callback is a no-op.
Now if the racy check slips out of our hands and we end up remotely
ticking an idle task, the empty task_tick_idle() is harmless. Still
it won't pass the WARN_ON_ONCE() test that ensures rq_clock_task() is
not too far from curr->se.exec_start because update_curr_idle() doesn't
update the exec_start value like other scheduler policies. Hence the
reported false positive.
So let's have another check, while the rq is locked, to make sure we
don't remote tick on an idle task. The lockless idle_cpu() still applies
to avoid unecessary rq lock contention.
Reported-by: Jacek Tomaka <jacekt@dug.com>
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1530203381-31234-1-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The static key sched_smt_present is only updated at boot time when SMT
siblings have been detected. Booting with maxcpus=1 and bringing the
siblings online after boot rebuilds the scheduling domains correctly but
does not update the static key, so the SMT code is not enabled.
Let the key be updated in the scheduler CPU hotplug code to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
During a context switch, we first switch_mm() to the next task's mm,
then switch_to() that new task. This means that vmalloc'd regions which
had previously been faulted in can transiently disappear in the context
of the prev task.
Functions instrumented by KCOV may try to access a vmalloc'd kcov_area
during this window, and as the fault handling code is instrumented, this
results in a recursive fault.
We must avoid accessing any kcov_area during this window. We can do so
with a new flag in kcov_mode, set prior to switching the mm, and cleared
once the new task is live. Since task_struct::kcov_mode isn't always a
specific enum kcov_mode value, this is made an unsigned int.
The manipulation is hidden behind kcov_{prepare,finish}_switch() helpers,
which are empty for !CONFIG_KCOV kernels.
The code uses macros because I can't use static inline functions without a
circular include dependency between <linux/sched.h> and <linux/kcov.h>,
since the definition of task_struct uses things defined in <linux/kcov.h>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180504135535.53744-4-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Pull restartable sequence support from Thomas Gleixner:
"The restartable sequences syscall (finally):
After a lot of back and forth discussion and massive delays caused by
the speculative distraction of maintainers, the core set of
restartable sequences has finally reached a consensus.
It comes with the basic non disputed core implementation along with
support for arm, powerpc and x86 and a full set of selftests
It was exposed to linux-next earlier this week, so it does not fully
comply with the merge window requirements, but there is really no
point to drag it out for yet another cycle"
* 'core-rseq-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
rseq/selftests: Provide Makefile, scripts, gitignore
rseq/selftests: Provide parametrized tests
rseq/selftests: Provide basic percpu ops test
rseq/selftests: Provide basic test
rseq/selftests: Provide rseq library
selftests/lib.mk: Introduce OVERRIDE_TARGETS
powerpc: Wire up restartable sequences system call
powerpc: Add syscall detection for restartable sequences
powerpc: Add support for restartable sequences
x86: Wire up restartable sequence system call
x86: Add support for restartable sequences
arm: Wire up restartable sequences system call
arm: Add syscall detection for restartable sequences
arm: Add restartable sequences support
rseq: Introduce restartable sequences system call
uapi/headers: Provide types_32_64.h
