Currently all the callers of btrfs_find_all_roots() pass a value of false
for its ignore_offset argument. This makes the argument pointless and we
can remove it and make btrfs_find_all_roots() always pass false as the
ignore_offset argument for btrfs_find_all_roots_safe(). So just do that.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
At btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() we call btrfs_find_all_roots() with a
NULL value as the transaction handle argument, which makes that function
take the commit_root_sem semaphore, which is necessary when we don't hold
a transaction handle or any other mechanism to prevent a transaction
commit from wiping out commit roots.
However btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() can be called in a context where
we are holding a write lock on an extent buffer from a subvolume tree,
namely from btrfs_truncate_inode_items(), called either during truncate
or unlink operations. In this case we end up with a lock inversion problem
because the commit_root_sem is a higher level lock, always supposed to be
acquired before locking any extent buffer.
Lockdep detects this lock inversion problem since we switched the extent
buffer locks from custom locks to semaphores, and when running btrfs/158
from fstests, it reported the following trace:
[ 9057.626435] ======================================================
[ 9057.627541] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 9057.628334] 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1 Not tainted
[ 9057.628961] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 9057.629867] kworker/u16:4/30781 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 9057.630824] ffff8e2590f58760 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.632542]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 9057.633551] ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.635255]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 9057.636292]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 9057.637240]
-> #1 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 9057.638138] down_read+0x46/0x140
[ 9057.638648] btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 [btrfs]
[ 9057.639398] btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x37/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 9057.640283] btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x418/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 9057.641114] btrfs_free_extent+0x35/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.641819] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x424/0xf70 [btrfs]
[ 9057.642643] btrfs_evict_inode+0x454/0x4f0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.643418] evict+0xcf/0x1d0
[ 9057.643895] do_unlinkat+0x1e9/0x300
[ 9057.644525] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 9057.645110] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 9057.645835]
-> #0 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 9057.646600] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210
[ 9057.647248] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 9057.647773] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140
[ 9057.648350] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.649175] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs]
[ 9057.650010] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 9057.650849] scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs]
[ 9057.651733] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.652501] scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.653264] scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs]
[ 9057.654295] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.655111] btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 9057.655831] process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0
[ 9057.656425] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[ 9057.656993] kthread+0x155/0x180
[ 9057.657494] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 9057.658030]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 9057.659064] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 9057.659824] CPU0 CPU1
[ 9057.660402] ---- ----
[ 9057.660988] lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
[ 9057.661581] lock(btrfs-tree-00);
[ 9057.662348] lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
[ 9057.663254] lock(btrfs-tree-00);
[ 9057.663690]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 9057.664437] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:4/30781:
[ 9057.665023] #0: ffff8e25922a1148 ((wq_completion)btrfs-scrub){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0
[ 9057.666260] #1: ffffabb3451ffe70 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0
[ 9057.667639] #2: ffff8e25922da198 (&ret->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x5d2/0x1640 [btrfs]
[ 9057.669017] #3: ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.670408]
stack backtrace:
[ 9057.670976] CPU: 7 PID: 30781 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1
[ 9057.672030] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 9057.673492] Workqueue: btrfs-scrub btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
[ 9057.674258] Call Trace:
[ 9057.674588] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
[ 9057.675083] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110
[ 9057.675611] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210
[ 9057.676132] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 9057.676605] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.677313] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140
[ 9057.677849] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140
[ 9057.678349] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.679068] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.679760] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs]
[ 9057.680458] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 9057.681083] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
[ 9057.681594] ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 9057.682336] scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs]
[ 9057.683058] ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 9057.683834] ? scrub_write_block_to_dev_replace+0xb0/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.684632] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.685316] scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.685977] ? ___ratelimit+0xa4/0x110
[ 9057.686460] scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs]
[ 9057.687316] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.688021] btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 9057.688649] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140
[ 9057.689180] process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0
[ 9057.689696] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[ 9057.690175] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ 9057.690731] kthread+0x155/0x180
[ 9057.691158] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
[ 9057.691697] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
Fix this by making btrfs_find_all_roots() never attempt to lock the
commit_root_sem when it is called from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post().
We can't just pass a non-NULL transaction handle to btrfs_find_all_roots()
from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post(), because that would make backref
lookup not use commit roots and acquire read locks on extent buffers, and
therefore could deadlock when btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() is called
from the btrfs_truncate_inode_items() code path which has acquired a write
lock on an extent buffer of the subvolume btree.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We no longer distinguish between blocking and spinning, so rip out all
this code.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that all the users of roots take references for them we can drop the
extra root ref we've been taking. Before we had roots at 2 refs for the
life of the file system, one for the radix tree, and one simply for
existing. Now that we have proper ref accounting in all places that use
roots we can drop this extra ref simply for existing as we no longer
need it.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Callers of alloc_test_extent_buffer have not correctly interpreted the
return value as error pointer, as alloc_test_extent_buffer should behave
as alloc_extent_buffer. The self-tests were unaffected but
btrfs_find_create_tree_block could call both functions and that would
cause problems up in the call chain.
Fixes: faa2dbf004 ("Btrfs: add sanity tests for new qgroup accounting code")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The test failures are not clearly visible in the system log as they're
printed at INFO level. Add a new helper that is level ERROR. As this
touches almost all strings, I took the opportunity to unify them:
- decapitalize the first letter as there's a prefix and the text
continues after ":"
- glue strings split to more lines and un-indent so they fit to 80
columns
- use %llu instead of %Lu
- drop \n from the modified messages (test_msg is left untouched)
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This will be necessary for future cleanups which remove the fs_info
argument from some freespace tree functions.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest,
ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the
SPDX header.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The extent tree of the test fs is like the following:
BTRFS info (device (null)): leaf 16327509003777336587 total ptrs 1 free space 3919
item 0 key (4096 168 4096) itemoff 3944 itemsize 51
extent refs 1 gen 1 flags 2
tree block key (68719476736 0 0) level 1
^^^^^^^
ref#0: tree block backref root 5
And it's using an empty tree for fs tree, so there is no way that its
level can be 1.
For REAL (created by mkfs) fs tree backref with no skinny metadata, the
result should look like:
item 3 key (30408704 EXTENT_ITEM 4096) itemoff 3845 itemsize 51
refs 1 gen 4 flags TREE_BLOCK
tree block key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) level 0
^^^^^^^
tree block backref root 5
Fix the level to 0, so it won't break later tree level checker.
Fixes: faa2dbf004 ("Btrfs: add sanity tests for new qgroup accounting code")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The LOGICAL_INO ioctl provides a backward mapping from extent bytenr and
offset (encoded as a single logical address) to a list of extent refs.
LOGICAL_INO complements TREE_SEARCH, which provides the forward mapping
(extent ref -> extent bytenr and offset, or logical address). These are
useful capabilities for programs that manipulate extents and extent
references from userspace (e.g. dedup and defrag utilities).
When the extents are uncompressed (and not encrypted and not other),
check_extent_in_eb performs filtering of the extent refs to remove any
extent refs which do not contain the same extent offset as the 'logical'
parameter's extent offset. This prevents LOGICAL_INO from returning
references to more than a single block.
To find the set of extent references to an uncompressed extent from [a, b),
userspace has to run a loop like this pseudocode:
for (i = a; i < b; ++i)
extent_ref_set += LOGICAL_INO(i);
At each iteration of the loop (up to 32768 iterations for a 128M extent),
data we are interested in is collected in the kernel, then deleted by
the filter in check_extent_in_eb.
When the extents are compressed (or encrypted or other), the 'logical'
parameter must be an extent bytenr (the 'a' parameter in the loop).
No filtering by extent offset is done (or possible?) so the result is
the complete set of extent refs for the entire extent. This removes
the need for the loop, since we get all the extent refs in one call.
Add an 'ignore_offset' argument to iterate_inodes_from_logical,
[...several levels of function call graph...], and check_extent_in_eb, so
that we can disable the extent offset filtering for uncompressed extents.
This flag can be set by an improved version of the LOGICAL_INO ioctl to
get either behavior as desired.
There is no functional change in this patch. The new flag is always
false.
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ minor coding style fixes ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We track the node sizes per-root, but they never vary from the values
in the superblock. This patch messes with the 80-column style a bit,
but subsequent patches to factor out root->fs_info into a convenience
variable fix it up again.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have a lot of random ints in btrfs_fs_info that can be put into flags. This
is mostly equivalent with the exception of how we deal with quota going on or
off, now instead we set a flag when we are turning it on or off and deal with
that appropriately, rather than just having a pending state that the current
quota_enabled gets set to. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This allows the upcoming patchset to push nodesize and sectorsize into
fs_info.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
self-tests code assumes 4k as the sectorsize and nodesize. This commit
fix hardcoded 4K. Enables the self-tests code to be executed on non-4k
page sized systems (e.g. ppc64).
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Feifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This tests the operations on the free space tree trying to excercise all
of the main cases for both formats. Between this and xfstests, the free
space tree should have pretty good coverage.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Since the self test transaction don't have delayed_ref_roots, so use
find_all_roots() and export btrfs_qgroup_account_extent() to simulate it
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Make the extent buffer allocation interface consistent. Cloned eb will
set a valid fs_info. For dummy eb, we can drop the length parameter and
set it from fs_info.
The built-in sanity checks may pass a NULL fs_info that's queried for
nodesize, but we know it's 4096.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
This exercises the various parts of the new qgroup accounting code. We do some
basic stuff and do some things with the shared refs to make sure all that code
works. I had to add a bunch of infrastructure because I needed to be able to
insert items into a fake tree without having to do all the hard work myself,
hopefully this will be usefull in the future. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
