Many function calls are done this way:
if ((retval = func()) != 0)
return retval;
while we expect in the kernel function calls like:
retval = func();
if (retval)
return retval;
Apply this change where possible and also use "ret" instead of
"retval" in ns_init_module for consistency, as it is only used in this
function.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200525085851.17682-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Some functions are prefixed "nandsim_", others "ns_" and many are
simply not prefixed at all. Make this file consistent by prefixing all
functions by "ns_".
This is a mechanical change. Sometimes the line is a bit reworked as
well to fit the kernel coding style. For instance, there are several
places where displayed strings are cut. When one of this line is
changed because of the naming update, the two parts of the strings
gets concatenated.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200525085851.17682-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Only v3.3-v5.0 have a different CS0 layout.
Controllers before v3.3 use the same layout for every CS.
Fixes: 27c5b17cd1 ("mtd: nand: add NAND driver "library" for Broadcom STB NAND controller")
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200522121524.4161539-3-noltari@gmail.com
pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
when it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200522104008.28340-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn
pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
when it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200522095139.19653-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn
Let's convert the driver to exec_op() to have one less driver relying
on the legacy interface.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519232454.374081-4-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
The rb-gpios semantics was undocumented and qi,lb60 (along with the
ingenic driver) got it wrong. The active state encodes the NAND ready
state, which is high level. Since there's no signal inverter on this
board, it should be active-high. Let's fix that here for older DTs so
we can re-use the generic nand_gpio_waitrdy() helper, and be consistent
with what other drivers do.
Suggested-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519232454.374081-3-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-62-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not
introducing any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-61-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-60-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-59-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-58-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not
introducing any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-57-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-56-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-55-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@st.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-53-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-52-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not
introducing any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-51-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-50-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-49-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-48-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-47-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-46-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-45-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-44-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible, hence pointing it as the commit to
fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing
any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-43-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-42-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_cleanup() is supposed to be called on error after a successful
call to nand_scan() to free all NAND resources.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible, hence pointing it as the commit to
fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing
any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-41-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-40-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
On error, the oxnas probe path just frees the device which failed and
aborts the probe, leaving unreleased resources.
Fix this situation by calling mtd_device_unregister()/nand_cleanup()
on these.
Fixes: 6685924924 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-38-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
While at it, be consistent and move the function call in the error
path thanks to a goto statement.
Fixes: 6685924924 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-37-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
All initialized and registered devices should be listed somewhere so
that we can unregister/free them in the _remove() path.
This patch is not a fix per-se but is needed to apply three other
fixes coming right after, explaining the Fixes/Cc: stable tags.
Fixes: 6685924924 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-36-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-35-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not
introducing any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-34-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-33-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-32-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-31-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-30-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-29-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
