leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
857,848 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags
cae154fcaefeb1ddab491d6fb651452a93bbf81d
Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
José Roberto de Souza
8241cfbe67 drm/i915/tgl: Access the right register when handling PSR interruptions 
For older gens PSR IIR and IMR have fixed addresses. From TGL onwards those
registers moved to each transcoder offset. The bits for the registers
are defined without an offset per transcoder as right now we have one
register per transcoder. So add a fake "trans_shift" when calculating
the bits offsets: it will be 0 for gen12+ and psr.transcoder otherwise.

v2 (Lucas): change the implementation to use trans_shift instead of
getting each bit value with a different macro

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-3-jose.souza@intel.com
 2019-09-04 17:03:35 -07:00
José Roberto de Souza
2f3b87124b drm/i915/psr: Only handle interruptions of the transcoder in use 
It was enabling and checking PSR interruptions in every transcoder
while it should keep the interruptions on the non-used transcoders
masked.

While doing this it gives us trouble on Tiger Lake if we are
reading/writing to registers of disabled transcoders since from gen12
onwards the registers are relative to the transcoder. Instead of forcing
them ON to access those registers, just avoid the accesses as they are
not needed.

v2 (Lucas):
  - Explain why we can't keep accessing all transcoders
  - Remove TODO about extending the irq handling to multiple instances:
    when/if implementing multiple instances it's pretty clear by the
    singleton psr that it needs to be extended
  - Fix intel_psr_debug_set() calling psr_irq_control() with
    psr.transcoder not set yet (from Imre). Now we only set the debug
    register right away if psr is already enabled. Otherwise we just
    record the value to be set when enabling the source.
  - Do not depend on the value of TRANSCODER_A. Just be relative to it
    (from Imre)
  - handle psr error last so we don't schedule the work before handling
    the other flags

v3:
  - Adding a warning about setting reserverd bits on EDP_PSR_IMR

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-2-jose.souza@intel.com
 2019-09-04 17:03:34 -07:00
José Roberto de Souza
99d7a74110 drm/i915/tgl: PSR link standby is not supported anymore 
According to BSpc if link standby is set on TGL+, PSR will not be
enabled. Vendors should not use panels that requires link standby and
even if they do, panel should assert a PSR error that will cause PSR to
be disabled.

BSpec: 50434
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-8-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
 2019-08-28 18:04:26 -07:00
José Roberto de Souza
f7b3c22619 drm/i915/tgl: Add maximum resolution supported by PSR2 HW 
TGL PSR2 HW supports a bigger resolution, so lets add it

BSpec: 50422, 49199
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-10-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
 2019-08-27 08:27:49 -07:00
José Roberto de Souza
0f81e645eb drm/i915: Do not read PSR2 register in transcoders without PSR2 
This fix unclaimed access warnings:

[  245.525788] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  245.525884] Unclaimed read from register 0x62900
[  245.526154] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1234 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1100 __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x40/0x50 [i915]
[  245.526160] Modules linked in: i915 x86_pkg_temp_thermal ax88179_178a coretemp usbnet crct10dif_pclmul mii crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel e1000e [last unloaded: i915]
[  245.526191] CPU: 0 PID: 1234 Comm: kms_fullmodeset Not tainted 5.1.0-rc6+ #915
[  245.526197] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake Client Platform/TigerLake U DDR4 SODIMM RVP, BIOS TGLSFWR1.D00.2081.A10.1904182155 04/18/2019
[  245.526273] RIP: 0010:__unclaimed_reg_debug+0x40/0x50 [i915]
[  245.526281] Code: 74 05 5b 5d 41 5c c3 45 84 e4 48 c7 c0 76 97 21 a0 48 c7 c6 6c 97 21 a0 89 ea 48 0f 44 f0 48 c7 c7 7f 97 21 a0 e8 4f 1e fe e0 <0f> 0b 83 2d 6f d9 1c 00 01 5b 5d 41 5c c3 66 90 41 57 41 56 41 55
[  245.526288] RSP: 0018:ffffc900006bf7d8 EFLAGS: 00010086
[  245.526297] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  245.526304] RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[  245.526310] RBP: 0000000000061900 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
[  245.526317] R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
[  245.526324] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8882914f0d58 R15: 0000000000000206
[  245.526332] FS:  00007fed2a3c39c0(0000) GS:ffff8882a8600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  245.526340] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  245.526347] CR2: 00007fed28dff000 CR3: 00000002a086c006 CR4: 0000000000760ef0
[  245.526354] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[  245.526361] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[  245.526367] PKRU: 55555554
[  245.526373] Call Trace:
[  245.526454]  gen11_fwtable_read32+0x219/0x250 [i915]
[  245.526576]  intel_psr_activate+0x57/0x400 [i915]
[  245.526697]  intel_psr_enable_locked+0x367/0x4b0 [i915]
[  245.526828]  intel_psr_enable+0xa4/0xd0 [i915]
[  245.526946]  intel_enable_ddi+0x127/0x2f0 [i915]
[  245.527075]  intel_encoders_enable.isra.79+0x62/0x90 [i915]
[  245.527202]  haswell_crtc_enable+0x2a2/0x850 [i915]
[  245.527337]  intel_update_crtc+0x51/0x360 [i915]
[  245.527466]  skl_update_crtcs+0x26c/0x300 [i915]
[  245.527603]  intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x3e5/0x13c0 [i915]
[  245.527757]  intel_atomic_commit+0x24d/0x2d0 [i915]
[  245.527782]  drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x7b/0x90
[  245.527799]  drm_mode_setcrtc+0x1b4/0x6f0
[  245.527856]  ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180
[  245.527867]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xad/0xf0
[  245.527886]  drm_ioctl+0x2f4/0x3b0
[  245.527902]  ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180
[  245.527935]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80
[  245.527956]  do_vfs_ioctl+0xa0/0x6d0
[  245.527970]  ? __task_pid_nr_ns+0xb6/0x200
[  245.527991]  ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x70
[  245.528009]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
[  245.528020]  do_syscall_64+0x55/0x180
[  245.528034]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  245.528042] RIP: 0033:0x7fed2cc7c3c7
[  245.528050] Code: 00 00 90 48 8b 05 c9 3a 0d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 99 3a 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  245.528057] RSP: 002b:00007ffe36944378 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[  245.528067] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe369443b0 RCX: 00007fed2cc7c3c7
[  245.528074] RDX: 00007ffe369443b0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 0000000000000003
[  245.528081] RBP: 00007ffe369443b0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000564c0173ae98
[  245.528088] R10: 0000564c0173aeb8 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c06864a2
[  245.528095] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[  245.528128] irq event stamp: 140866
[  245.528138] hardirqs last  enabled at (140865): [<ffffffff819a63dc>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x60
[  245.528148] hardirqs last disabled at (140866): [<ffffffff819a624d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd/0x50
[  245.528158] softirqs last  enabled at (140860): [<ffffffff81c0038c>] __do_softirq+0x38c/0x499
[  245.528170] softirqs last disabled at (140853): [<ffffffff810b4a09>] irq_exit+0xa9/0xc0
[  245.528247] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1234 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1100 __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x40/0x50 [i915]
[  245.528254] ---[ end trace 366069676e98a410 ]---

Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-7-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
 2019-08-27 08:27:49 -07:00
José Roberto de Souza
6056517ab8 drm/i915/tgl: Guard and warn if more than one eDP panel is present 
On TGL+ it's possible to have PSR1 enabled in other ports besides DDIA.
PSR2 is still limited to DDIA. However currently we handle only one
instance of PSR struct. Lets guard intel_psr_init_dpcd() against
multiple eDP panels and warn about it.

v2: Reword commit message to be TGL+ only and with the info where
PSR1/PSR2 are supported (Lucas)

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
 2019-08-27 08:27:49 -07:00
José Roberto de Souza
df7415bfc0 drm/i915: Do not unmask PSR interruption in IRQ postinstall 
No need to unmask PSR interrutpion if PSR is not enabled, better move
the call to intel_psr_enable_source().

v2: Renamed intel_psr_irq_control() to psr_irq_control() (Lucas)

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-3-jose.souza@intel.com
 2019-08-22 13:09:24 -07:00
José Roberto de Souza
99fc38b120 drm/i915: Add transcoder restriction to PSR2 
According to PSR2_CTL definition in BSpec there is only one instance
of PSR2_CTL. Platforms gen < 12 with EDP transcoder only support PSR2
on TRANSCODER_EDP while on TGL PSR2 is only supported by
TRANSCODER_A.

Since BDW PSR is allowed on any port, but we need to restrict by
transcoder.

v8: Renamed _psr2_supported_in_trans() to psr2_supported() (Lucas)

v9: Renamed psr2_supported() to transcoder_has_psr2() (Ville)

BSpec: 7713
BSpec: 20584
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-2-jose.souza@intel.com
 2019-08-22 13:09:16 -07:00
José Roberto de Souza
4ab4fa1032 drm/i915/psr: Make PSR registers relative to transcoders 
PSR registers are a mess, some have the full address while others just
have the additional offset from psr_mmio_base.

For BDW+ psr_mmio_base is nothing more than TRANSCODER_EDP_OFFSET +
0x800 and using it makes more difficult for people with an PSR
register address or PSR register name from from BSpec as i915 also
don't match the BSpec names.
For HSW psr_mmio_base is _DDI_BUF_CTL_A + 0x800 and PSR registers are
only available in DDIA.

Other reason to make relative to transcoder is that since BDW every
transcoder have PSR registers, so in theory it should be possible to
have PSR enabled in a non-eDP transcoder.

So for BDW+ we can use _TRANS2() to get the register offset of any
PSR register in any transcoder while for HSW we have _HSW_PSR_ADJ
that will calculate the register offset for the single PSR instance,
noting that we are already guarded about trying to enable PSR in other
port than DDIA on HSW by the 'if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A)' in
intel_psr_compute_config(), this check should only be valid for HSW
and will be changed in future.
PSR2 registers and PSR_EVENT was added after Haswell so that is why
_PSR_ADJ() is not used in some macros.

The only registers that can not be relative to transcoder are
PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR that are not relative to anything, so keeping it
hardcoded. That changed for TGL but it will be handled in another
patch.

Also removing BDW_EDP_PSR_BASE from GVT because it is not used as it
is the only PSR register that GVT have.

v5:
- Macros changed to be more explicit about HSW (Dhinakaran)
- Squashed with the patch that added the tran parameter to the
macros (Dhinakaran)

v6:
- Checking for interruption errors after module reload in the
transcoder that will be used (Dhinakaran)
- Using lowercase to the registers offsets

v7:
- Removing IS_HASWELL() from registers macros(Jani)

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-1-jose.souza@intel.com
 2019-08-22 13:09:06 -07:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
4cb3b44d6b drm/i915: Wrappers for display register waits 
To reduce the number of explicit dev_priv->uncore calls in the display
code ahead of the introduction of dev_priv->de_uncore, this patch
introduces a wrapper for one of the main usages of it, the register
waits. When we transition to the new uncore, we can just update the
wrapper to point to the appropriate structure.

Since the vast majority of waits are on a set or clear of a bit or mask,
add set & clear flavours of the wrapper to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816012343.36433-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
 2019-08-16 22:19:05 +01:00
Jani Nikula
1d455f8de8 drm/i915: rename intel_drv.h to display/intel_display_types.h 
Everything about the file is about display, and mostly about types
related to display. Move under display/ as intel_display_types.h to
reflect the facts.

There's still plenty to clean up, but start off with moving the file
where it logically belongs and naming according to contents.

v2: fix the include guard name in the renamed file

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190806113933.11799-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
 2019-08-07 12:43:50 +03:00
José Roberto de Souza
381f8a20d2 drm/i915/psr: Force manual PSR exit in older gens 
To do frontbuffer tracking we are depending on Display WA #0884 to
exit PSR when there is a frontbuffer modification but according to
user reports a write to CURSURFLIVE do not cause PSR to exit in older
gens so lets force a PSR exit.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110799
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Tested-by: Thomas Rohwer <trohwer85@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190617195154.30292-1-jose.souza@intel.com
 2019-06-18 12:33:14 -07:00
Jani Nikula
df0566a641 drm/i915: move modesetting core code under display/ 
Now that we have a new subdirectory for display code, continue by moving
modesetting core code.

display/intel_frontbuffer.h sticks out like a sore thumb, otherwise this
is, again, a surprisingly clean operation.

v2:
- don't move intel_sideband.[ch] (Ville)
- use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613084416.6794-3-jani.nikula@intel.com
 2019-06-17 11:48:32 +03:00