The logic that handles CA_SET_PID is clearly missing a
break: it prints that the command succeeded, but, due to the
missing break, it would be returning -EOPNOTSUPP, as if the
driver weren't supporting such ioctl.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Two local variables will be set to an appropriate value a bit later.
Thus omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
It is responsibility of a caller of fops->open(),
to make sure an owner of the fops is available until file is closed.
So, there is no need to lock THIS_MODULE explicitly.
Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
The Media Controller New Generation redefines the types for both
interfaces and entities to be used on DVB. Make the needed
changes at the DVB core for all interfaces, entities and
data and interface links to appear in the graph.
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
As reported by smatch:
drivers/media/pci/bt8xx/dst_ca.c:323 ca_get_message() warn: this array is probably non-NULL. 'p_ca_message->msg'
drivers/media/pci/bt8xx/dst_ca.c:498 ca_send_message() warn: this array is probably non-NULL. 'p_ca_message->msg'
Those two checks are needless/useless, as the ca_msg struct is
declared as:
typedef struct ca_msg {
unsigned int index;
unsigned int type;
unsigned int length;
unsigned char msg[256];
} ca_msg_t;
So, if the p_ca_message pointer is not null, msg will also be
not null.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it,
change the code to return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Change several memcpy() to memmove() in cases when the regions are
definitely overlapping; memcpy() of overlapping regions is undefined
behavior in C and can produce different results depending on the compiler,
the memcpy implementation, etc.
Cc: Andy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: Nickolai Zeldovich <nickolai@csail.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@r1@
statement S;
position p,p1;
@@
S@p1;@p
@script:python r2@
p << r1.p;
p1 << r1.p1;
@@
if p[0].line != p1[0].line_end:
cocci.include_match(False)
@@
position r1.p;
@@
-;@p
// </smpl>
[mchehab@redhat.com: some hunks got bitroted; applied only the
ones that succeeds]
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
[crope@iki.fi: For my drivers a8293, af9013, af9015, af9035]
Acked-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
