We need the rename of reservation_object to dma_resv.
The solution on this merge came from linux-next:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:48:39 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] drm: fix up fallout from "dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
index 03d90b49584a..4cd54c569911 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
@@ -43,12 +43,12 @@ static int pool_active(struct i915_active *ref)
{
struct intel_engine_pool_node *node =
container_of(ref, typeof(*node), active);
- struct reservation_object *resv = node->obj->base.resv;
+ struct dma_resv *resv = node->obj->base.resv;
int err;
- if (reservation_object_trylock(resv)) {
- reservation_object_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
- reservation_object_unlock(resv);
+ if (dma_resv_trylock(resv)) {
+ dma_resv_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
+ dma_resv_unlock(resv);
}
err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(node->obj);
which is a simplified version from a previous one which had:
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
UAPI Changes:
Cross-subsystem Changes:
Core Changes:
- dma-buf: add reservation_object_fences helper, relax
reservation_object_add_shared_fence, remove
reservation_object seq number (and then
restored)
- dma-fence: Shrinkage of the dma_fence structure,
Merge dma_fence_signal and dma_fence_signal_locked,
Store the timestamp in struct dma_fence in a union with
cb_list
Driver Changes:
- More dt-bindings YAML conversions
- More removal of drmP.h includes
- dw-hdmi: Support get_eld and various i2s improvements
- gm12u320: Few fixes
- meson: Global cleanup
- panfrost: Few refactors, Support for GPU heap allocations
- sun4i: Support for DDC enable GPIO
- New panels: TI nspire, NEC NL8048HL11, LG Philips LB035Q02,
Sharp LS037V7DW01, Sony ACX565AKM, Toppoly TD028TTEC1
Toppoly TD043MTEA1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEABYIAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCXVqvpwAKCRDj7w1vZxhR
xa3RAQDzAnt5zeesAxX4XhRJzHoCEwj2PJj9Re6xMJ9PlcfcvwD+OS+bcB6jfiXV
Ug9IBd/DqjlmD9G9MxFxfSV946rksAw=
=8uv4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'drm-misc-next-2019-08-19' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc into drm-next
drm-misc-next for 5.4:
UAPI Changes:
Cross-subsystem Changes:
Core Changes:
- dma-buf: add reservation_object_fences helper, relax
reservation_object_add_shared_fence, remove
reservation_object seq number (and then
restored)
- dma-fence: Shrinkage of the dma_fence structure,
Merge dma_fence_signal and dma_fence_signal_locked,
Store the timestamp in struct dma_fence in a union with
cb_list
Driver Changes:
- More dt-bindings YAML conversions
- More removal of drmP.h includes
- dw-hdmi: Support get_eld and various i2s improvements
- gm12u320: Few fixes
- meson: Global cleanup
- panfrost: Few refactors, Support for GPU heap allocations
- sun4i: Support for DDC enable GPIO
- New panels: TI nspire, NEC NL8048HL11, LG Philips LB035Q02,
Sharp LS037V7DW01, Sony ACX565AKM, Toppoly TD028TTEC1
Toppoly TD043MTEA1
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
[airlied: fixup dma_resv rename fallout]
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190819141923.7l2adietcr2pioct@flea
As every i915_active_request should be serialised by a dedicated lock,
i915_active consists of a tree of locks; one for each node. Markup up
the i915_active_request with what lock is supposed to be guarding it so
that we can verify that the serialised updated are indeed serialised.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816121000.8507-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Be more consistent with the naming of the other DMA-buf objects.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/323401/
As pointed out by Chris, with our current approach we are actually
limited to S16_MAX * PAGE_SIZE for our size when using the blt to clear
pages. Keeping things simple try to fix this by reducing the copy to a
sequence of S16_MAX * PAGE_SIZE blocks.
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[ickle: hide the details of the engine pool inside emit_vma]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190810092945.2762-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Currently we just pass in bcs0->engine_context so it matters not, but in
the future we may want to pass in something that is not a
kernel_context, so try to be a bit more generic.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190810091748.10972-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Everything about the file is about display, and mostly about types
related to display. Move under display/ as intel_display_types.h to
reflect the facts.
There's still plenty to clean up, but start off with moving the file
where it logically belongs and naming according to contents.
v2: fix the include guard name in the renamed file
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190806113933.11799-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
My plan for the future is to have kernel contexts not to have a GEM
context backpointer (as they will not belong to any GEM context). In a
few places, we use ce->gem_context to simply obtain the i915 backpointer,
for which we can use ce->engine->i915 instead.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730163441.16477-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Track the currently bound address space used by the HW context. Minor
conversions to use the local intel_context.vm are made, leaving behind
some more surgery required to make intel_context the primary through the
selftests.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730143209.4549-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we have already plugged the w->dma into the reservation_object, and
have set ourselves up to automatically signal the request and w->dma on
completion, we do not need to export the rq->fence directly and just use
the w->dma fence.
This avoids having to take the reservation_lock inside the worker which
cross-release lockdep would complain about. :)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190621215733.12070-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since commit 1ba627148e ("drm: Add reservation_object to
drm_gem_object"), struct drm_gem_object grew its own builtin
reservation_object rendering our own private one bloat. Remove our
redundant reservation_object and point into obj->base.resv instead.
References: 1ba627148e ("drm: Add reservation_object to drm_gem_object")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190618125858.7295-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The plan is to use the blitter engine for async object clearing when
using local memory, but before we can move the worker to get_pages() we
have to first tame some more of our struct_mutex usage. With this in
mind we should be able to upstream the object clearing as some
selftests, which should serve as a guinea pig for the ongoing locking
rework and upcoming async get_pages() framework.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190529123108.24422-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
