nvkm_timer_alarm() already handles this as part of protecting against
callers passing in no timeout value.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The msgqueue pointer validity should be checked by its owner, not by the
msgqueue code itself to avoid this situation.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Reading registers at device construction time can be harmful, as there
is no guarantee the underlying engine will be up, or in its runtime
configuration. Defer register reading to the oneinit() hook and update
users accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
gm20b PMU firmware is driven by a msgqueue, so connect relevant PMU
hooks to their msgqueue counterparts.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
NVIDIA-provided PMU firmware is controlled by a msgqueue. Add a member
to the PMU structure as well as the required cleanup code if this
feature is used.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some PMU implementations (in particular the ones managed by secure
boot) may not have a reset() hook. Make sure we don't crash in that
case.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Add a dummy PMU device so the PMU falcon is instanciated and can be used
by secure boot.
We could reuse gk20a's implementation here, but it would fight with
secboot over PMU falcon's ownership and secboot will reset the PMU,
preventing it from operating afterwards. Proper handout between secboot
and pmu is coming along with the actual gm20b PMU implementation, so
use this as a temporary solution.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some functions always succeed - change their return type to void and
remove the error-handling code in their caller.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Use the PMU constructor so that all base members (in particular the
falcon instance) are initialized properly.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Have an instance of nvkm_falcon in the PMU structure, ready to be used
by other subdevs (i.e. secboot).
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Add a PMU constructor so implementations that extend the nvkm_pmu
structure can have all base members properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The reset hook of pmu_func is never called, and gt215 was the only chip
to implement. Remove this dead code.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
When we start communicating with the pmu a bit more, the current code is
a real issue. I encountered a dead lock here, while testing my dynamic
reclocking code
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
the macro deals with target specific differences and so we should always use
this
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
on gk208+ we can simply mov 32bits, so we should have a single mov there
v2: use or operator instead of add
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
NVIDIA have indicated that the workaround is required on all GK10[467]
boards that have the PGOB fuse set.
I've left the commandline option in place for now, as paranoia.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some devices may not have a PMU. Avoid a NULL pointer dereference in
such cases by checking whether the pointer given to nvkm_pmu_pgob() is
valid.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Pretty much every subdev/engine is going to need access to nvkm_device
shortly to touch registers and/or output messages.
The odd placement of the includes is necessary to work around some
inter-dependencies that currently exist. This will be fixed later.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Will be utilised in upcoming commits to remove the need for heuristics
to lookup the device a subdev belongs to.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Only a handful of machines have this enabled by default, where it's been
proven to work. The workaround can be explicitly enabled with a module
option also.
Still waiting on feedback from NVIDIA for a proper idea of exactly what
this fix is doing, and how to implement it properly.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Make static a few functions and structures that should be.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Before we moved gk110's implementation of this to pmu, the functions were
identical. This commit just switches GK208 to use the new (more complete)
implementation of the power-up sequence.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Turns out the PTHERM part of this dance is bracketed by the same PMU
fiddling that occurs on GK104/6, let's assume it's also PGOB.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Switch to NVIDIA's name for the device.
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
