Pull staging and IIO driver updates from Greg KH:
"Here is the "big" set of staging and IIO driver patches for 5.12-rc1.
Nothing really huge in here, the number of staging tree patches has
gone down for a bit, maybe there's only so much churn to happen in
here at the moment.
The IIO changes are:
- new drivers
- new DT bindings
- new iio driver features
with full details in the shortlog.
The staging driver patches are just a lot of tiny coding style
cleanups, along with some semi-larger hikey driver cleanups as those
are _almost_ good enough to get out of the staging tree, but will
probably have to wait until 5.13 to have happen.
All of these have been in linux-next with no reported issues"
* tag 'staging-5.12-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging: (189 commits)
staging: hikey9xx: Fix alignment of function parameters
staging: greybus: Fixed a misspelling in hid.c
staging: wimax/i2400m: fix some byte order issues found by sparse
staging: wimax: i2400m: fix some incorrect type warnings
staging: greybus: minor code style fix
staging:wlan-ng: use memdup_user instead of kmalloc/copy_from_user
staging:r8188eu: use IEEE80211_FCTL_* kernel definitions
staging: rtl8192e: remove multiple blank lines
staging: greybus: Fixed alignment issue in hid.c
staging: wfx: remove unused included header files
staging: nvec: minor coding style fix
staging: wimax: Fix some coding style problem
staging: fbtft: add tearing signal detect
staging: vt6656: Fixed issue with alignment in rf.c
staging: qlge: Remove duplicate word in comment
staging: rtl8723bs: remove obsolete commented out code
staging: rtl8723bs: fix function comments to follow kernel-doc
staging: wfx: avoid defining array of flexible struct
staging: rtl8723bs: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member in struct ndis_80211_var_ie
staging: Replace lkml.org links with lore
...
Fix sparse byte-order warnings in the i2400m_bm_cmd_prepare()
function:
wimax/i2400m/fw.c:194:36: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
wimax/i2400m/fw.c:195:34: warning: invalid assignment: +=
wimax/i2400m/fw.c:195:34: left side has type unsigned int
wimax/i2400m/fw.c:195:34: right side has type restricted __le32
wimax/i2400m/fw.c:196:32: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
wimax/i2400m/fw.c:196:47: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
wimax/i2400m/fw.c:196:66: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
Signed-off-by: Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@anirudhrb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212153843.8554-1-mail@anirudhrb.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This switchdev attribute offers a counterproductive API for a driver
writer, because although br_switchdev_set_port_flag gets passed a
"flags" and a "mask", those are passed piecemeal to the driver, so while
the PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS listener knows what changed because it has the
"mask", the BRIDGE_FLAGS listener doesn't, because it only has the final
value. But certain drivers can offload only certain combinations of
settings, like for example they cannot change unicast flooding
independently of multicast flooding - they must be both on or both off.
The way the information is passed to switchdev makes drivers not
expressive enough, and unable to reject this request ahead of time, in
the PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS notifier, so they are forced to reject it during
the deferred BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute, where the rejection is currently
ignored.
This patch also changes drivers to make use of the "mask" field for edge
detection when possible.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In this particular case, the struct element is already flexible struct.
Thus struct element ie[] is ambiguous inside another struct. The members
of struct element ie aren't being accessed in code anywhere. The data of
u8 type is copied in it. So it has been changed to u8 ie[] to make the
sparse happy and code simple.
Warning from sparse:
drivers/stagingwfx/hif_tx.c: note: in included file (through drivers/stagingwfx/data_tx.h, drivers/staging//wfx/wfx.h):
drivers/staging//wfx/hif_api_cmd.h:103:26: warning: array of flexible structures
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <musamaanjum@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210211105026.GA45458@LEGION
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct ndis_80211_var_ie, instead of a one-element array.
Also, this helps with the ongoing efforts to enable -Warray-bounds and
fix the following warnings:
CC [M] drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.o
In file included from ./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/drv_types.h:20,
from drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:9:
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c: In function ‘HT_caps_handler’:
./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h:108:11: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
108 | (EF1BYTE(*((u8 *)(__pstart))))
| ^
./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h:42:8: note: in definition of macro ‘EF1BYTE’
42 | ((u8)(_val))
| ^~~~
./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h:127:4: note: in expansion of macro ‘LE_P1BYTE_TO_HOST_1BYTE’
127 | (LE_P1BYTE_TO_HOST_1BYTE(__pstart) >> (__bitoffset)) & \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_ht.h:97:55: note: in expansion of macro ‘LE_BITS_TO_1BYTE’
97 | #define GET_HT_CAPABILITY_ELE_RX_STBC(_pEleStart) LE_BITS_TO_1BYTE((_pEleStart)+1, 0, 2)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1104:58: note: in expansion of macro ‘GET_HT_CAPABILITY_ELE_RX_STBC’
1104 | if (TEST_FLAG(phtpriv->stbc_cap, STBC_HT_ENABLE_TX) && GET_HT_CAPABILITY_ELE_RX_STBC(pIE->data)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1051:75: warning: array subscript 2 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
1051 | if ((pmlmeinfo->HT_caps.u.HT_cap_element.AMPDU_para & 0x3) > (pIE->data[i] & 0x3))
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c: In function ‘check_assoc_AP’:
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1606:19: warning: array subscript 4 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
1606 | if (pIE->data[4] == 1)
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1609:20: warning: array subscript 5 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
1609 | if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_92SE)
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1613:19: warning: array subscript 5 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
1613 | if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_SOFTAP)
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1617:20: warning: array subscript 6 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
1617 | if (pIE->data[6] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_JAGUAR_BCUT) {
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/602434b8.jc5DoXJ0bmHoxgIL%25lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210210224937.GA11922@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove braces from both occurences of single line if blocks in
include/rtw_mlme.h, fixes two checkpatch warnings, thus clearing
this type of warning from this file.
Also swaps two if statement comparisons around, so the variable is on
the left in each one. This fixes two warnings also.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210209001043.165080-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
When the firmware rejects a frame (because station become asleep or
disconnected), the frame is re-queued in mac80211. However, the
re-queued frame was 8 bytes longer than the original one (the size of
the ICV for the encryption). So, when mac80211 try to send this frame
again, it is a little bigger than expected.
If the frame is re-queued secveral time it end with a skb_over_panic
because the skb buffer is not large enough.
Note it only happens when device acts as an AP and encryption is
enabled.
This patch more or less reverts the commit 049fde1304 ("staging: wfx:
drop useless field from struct wfx_tx_priv").
Fixes: 049fde1304 ("staging: wfx: drop useless field from struct wfx_tx_priv")
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210208135254.399964-1-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Constify two static structs which are never modified, to allow the
compiler to put them in read-only memory.
The only usage of controller_attribute_group is to put its address in an
array of pointers to const struct attribute_group, and the only usage of
can_power_ops is to assign its address to the 'ops' field in the
regulator_desc struct, which is a pointer to const struct regulator_ops.
Reviewed-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210207202501.9494-1-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The global gpio_desc pointer and int vbus_irq were defined in the header,
instead put the definitions in the translation unit and make them static as
there's only a single consumer, and these symbols shouldn't pollute the
global namespace.
This fixes the following sparse warnings for this driver:
drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c: note: in included file:
drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h:23:18: warning: symbol 'vbus_gpio' was not
declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h:24:5:
warning: symbol 'vbus_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210207085911.270746-1-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
multiple structures contains a ieee80211_rts structure, which is required to
have at least two byte alignment, but are annotated with a __packed attribute
to force single-byte alignment:
staging/vt6656/rxtx.h:98:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct vnt_rts_g' is less than 2 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
staging/vt6656/rxtx.h:106:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct vnt_rts_ab' is less than 2 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
staging/vt6656/rxtx.h:116:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct vnt_cts' is less than 2 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
I see no reason why the structure itself would be misaligned, and all members
have at least two-byte alignment within the structure, so use the same
constraint on the sturcture itself.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210204162731.3132069-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Building this with 'make W=1' produces a couple of warnings:
rtl8723bs/include/ieee80211.h:730:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct ieee80211_assoc_request_frame' is less than 2 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
rtl8723bs/include/ieee80211.h:737:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct ieee80211_assoc_response_frame' is less than 2 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
The warnings are in dead code, so just remove the bits that
are obviously broken like this.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210204162956.3276523-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-14-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-13-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-12-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-11-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-10-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-9-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
