Based on mesa commit daa2ccff7a0201941db3901780d179e2634057d5
Small bit of .c churn in the phy code to adapt to split up of phy
related registers.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
clang is a little overzealous with warning about a constant conversion
in an untaken branch of a ternary expression:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c:975:48: error: implicit conversion from 'unsigned long long' to 'unsigned long' changes value from 5000000000 to 705032704 [-Werror,-Wconstant-conversion]
.max_pll_rate = (5000000000ULL < ULONG_MAX) ? 5000000000UL : ULONG_MAX,
^~~~~~~~~~~~
Rewrite this to use a preprocessor conditional instead to avoid the
warning.
Fixes: 076437c9e3 ("drm/msm/dsi: move min/max PLL rate to phy config")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514213032.575161-1-arnd@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Fix following warnings generated when either DP or DSI support is
disabled:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.c:141:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'msm_dp_snapshot'; did you mean 'msm_dsi_snapshot'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_kms.h:127:26: warning: 'struct msm_disp_state' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c:867:21: error: initialization of 'void (*)(struct msm_disp_state *, struct msm_kms *)' from incompatible pointer type 'void (*)(struct msm_disp_state *, struct msm_kms *)' [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h:94:30: warning: 'struct msm_disp_state' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Fixes: 1c3b7ac1a71d ("drm/msm: pass dump state as a function argument")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210527220330.3364716-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Add the msm_disp_snapshot module which adds supports to dump dpu
registers and capture the drm atomic state which can be used in
case of error conditions.
changes in v5:
- start storing disp_state in msm_kms instead of dpu_kms
- get rid of MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_* enum by simplifying the functions
- move snprintf inside the snapshot core by using varargs
- get rid of some stale code comments
- allow snapshot module for non-DPU targets
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1618606645-19695-3-git-send-email-abhinavk@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
A problem was reported on CoachZ devices where the display wouldn't come
up, or it would be distorted. It turns out that the PLL code here wasn't
getting called once dsi_pll_10nm_vco_recalc_rate() started returning the
same exact frequency, down to the Hz, that the bootloader was setting
instead of 0 when the clk was registered with the clk framework.
After commit 001d8dc338 ("drm/msm/dsi: remove temp data from global
pll structure") we use a hardcoded value for the parent clk frequency,
i.e. VCO_REF_CLK_RATE, and we also hardcode the value for FRAC_BITS,
instead of getting it from the config structure. This combination of
changes to the recalc function allows us to properly calculate the
frequency of the PLL regardless of whether or not the PLL has been
clk_prepare()d or clk_set_rate()d. That's a good improvement.
Unfortunately, this means that now we won't call down into the PLL clk
driver when we call clk_set_rate() because the frequency calculated in
the framework matches the frequency that is set in hardware. If the rate
is the same as what we want it should be OK to not call the set_rate PLL
op. The real problem is that the prepare op in this driver uses a
private struct member to stash away the vco frequency so that it can
call the set_rate op directly during prepare. Once the set_rate op is
never called because recalc_rate told us the rate is the same, we don't
set this private struct member before the prepare op runs, so we try to
call the set_rate function directly with a frequency of 0. This
effectively kills the PLL and configures it for a rate that won't work.
Calling set_rate from prepare is really quite bad and will confuse any
downstream clks about what the rate actually is of their parent. Fixing
that will be a rather large change though so we leave that to later.
For now, let's stash away the rate we calculate during recalc so that
the prepare op knows what frequency to set, instead of 0. This way
things keep working and the display can enable the PLL properly. In the
future, we should remove that code from the prepare op so that it
doesn't even try to call the set rate function.
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Fixes: 001d8dc338 ("drm/msm/dsi: remove temp data from global pll structure")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210608195519.125561-1-swboyd@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
The PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1 was being programmed with a hardcoded value
directly, but the same value was also being specified in the
dsi_pll_regs struct pll_lockdet_rate variable: let's use it!
Based on 362cadf34b ("drm/msm/dsi_pll_10nm: Fix variable usage for
pll_lockdet_rate")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
The number of fractional registers bits is known and already set in
the frac_bits variable of the dsi_pll_config struct here in 7nm:
remove the TODO by simply using that variable. This is a copy of
196145eb1a ("drm/msm/dsi_pll_10nm: Solve TODO for multiplier frac_bits
assignment").
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Fix setting min/max DSI PLL rate for the V4.1 7nm DSI PLL (used on
sm8250). Current code checks for pll->type before it is set (as it is
set in the msm_dsi_pll_init() after calling device-specific functions.
Cc: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
Fixes: 1ef7c99d14 ("drm/msm/dsi: add support for 7nm DSI PHY/PLL")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
The PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1 was being programmed with a hardcoded value
directly, but the same value was also being specified in the
dsi_pll_regs struct pll_lockdet_rate variable: let's use it!
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
The number of fractional registers bits is known and already set in
the frac_bits variable of the dsi_pll_config struct here in 10nm:
remove the TODO by simply using that variable.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
In function dsi_pll_calc_dec_frac we are calculating the decimal
div start parameter by dividing the decimal multiple by the
fractional multiplier: the remainder of that operation is stored
to then get programmed to the fractional divider registers of
the PLL.
It's useless to call div_u64_rem to get the remainder and *then*
call div_u64 to get the division result, as the first is already
giving that result: let's fix it by just caring about the result
of div_u64_rem.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
The previous registers were *almost* correct, but instead of
PHYs, they were pointing at DSI PLLs, resulting in the PHY id
autodetection failing miserably.
Fixes: dcefc117cc ("drm/msm/dsi: Add support for msm8x94")
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
The only usage of dsi_host_ops is to assign its address to the ops field
in the mipi_dsi_host struct, which is a const pointer. Make it const to
allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.
Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
