The INTEL_INFO() macro extracts the dev_private pointer from the device,
so passing in the dev_private->dev is a long winded circumlocution.
v2: rebase onto uncore
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Detangle the confusion that NOTRACE variants of the register read/write
routines were directly using the raw register access. We need for those
routines to reuse the common code for serializing register access and
ensuring the correct register power states. This is only possible now
that the only routines that required raw access use their own API.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The GT functions for enabling register access also need to occasionally
write to and read from registers. To avoid the potential recursion as we
modify the public interface to be stricter, introduce a private register
access API for the GT functions.
v2: Rebase
v3: Rebase onto uncore
v4: Use raw interfaces consistently so that we only use the low-level
readN functions from a single location.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Currently, the register access code is split between i915_drv.c and
intel_pm.c. It only bares a superficial resemblance to the reset of the
powermanagement code, so move it all into its own file. This is to ease
further patches to enforce serialised register access.
v2: Scan for random abuse of I915_WRITE_NOTRACE
v3: Take the opportunity to rename the GT functions as uncore. Uncore is
the term used by the hardware design (and bspec) for all functions
outside of the GPU (and CPU) cores in what is also known as the System
Agent.
v4: Rebase onto SNB rc6 fixes
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
[danvet: Wrestle patch into applying and inline
intel_uncore_early_sanitize (plus move the old comment to the new
function). Also keep the _santize postfix for intel_uncore_sanitize.]
[danvet: Squash in fixup spotted by Chris on irc: We need to call
intel_pm_init before intel_uncore_sanitize since the later will call
cancel_work on the delayed rps setup work the former initializes.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
