If the regulator constraints are empty and there is no voltage
reported then nothing will be added to the text displayed for the
constraints, leading to random stack data being printed. This is
unlikely to happen for practical regulators since most will at
least report a voltage but should still be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Currently it is possible for regulator_bulk_{enable,disable} operations to
generate unbalanced regulator_{disable,enable} calls in its error path.
In case of an error only those regulators of the bulk operation which actually
had been enabled/disabled should get their original state restored.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Since some regulators in the system may not support suspend mode
configuration we need to allow some regulators to have a missing
suspend mode configuration. Do this by requiring that disabled
regulators are explicitly flagged and then skip over regulators
that have no state specified.
Try to avoid surprises by warning the if we could set the state
but no configuration is provided. This also ensures that an all
zeros configuration generates a warning rather than silently
disabling the regulator.
Reported-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Some of the regulator API functions have code to allow the machine
constraints to override the device supplied name for the regulator
in the constraints in order to help tie logging to supplies on the
board and disambiguate when there is more than one regulator chip
in the system. Factor this code out into a new rdev_get_name()
function and use it throughout the regulator API so that we always
use the same name.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
When voltage or current constraints are either missing or specify
a range display the actual setting along with the constraints if
we can. This can aid debugging of configuration problems.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
It makes sense to do all the voltage configuration in the one split
out function.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This allows constraints to take effect on regulators that support
voltage setting but for which the board does not specify a voltage
range (for example, because it is fixed correctly at system startup).
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
If we're going to log an error we may as well log what the error
code that we're failing on is.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This makes _regulator_enable() properly handle the case where
a regulator is already on when you try to enable it. Currently
it will erroneously handle positive return values as an error.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The regulator_enable() code wasn't actually checking that the
machine constraints had given permission to enable the regulator.
Add code to do that, but only if the regulator is not already on
due to something like always_on or being left on at startup since
in those cases there's no physical change being introduced and the
constraint wouldn't make any sense.
Also add matching code for disable(). We need to do less there since
either regulator_enable() should have succeeded first or the board
setup makes no sense.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Allows use by more of the internal regulator API code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The patch to add support for looking up consumers by device name
had the side effect of causing us to require a device which is
at best premature since at least cpufreq still operates outside
the device model. Remove that requirement.
Reported-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
We're probably going to start oopsing fairly soon after this happens.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Simplify checking of support for voltage ranges by providing an API which
wraps the existing count and list operations.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Some consumers require complete control of the regulator and can't
tolerate sharing it with other consumers, most commonly because they need
to have the regulator actually disabled so can't have other consumers
forcing it on. This new regulator_get_exclusive() API call allows these
consumers to explicitly request this, documenting the assumptions that
they are making.
In order to simplify coding of such consumers the use count for regulators
they request is forced to match the enabled state of the regulator when
it is requested. This is not possible for consumers which can share
regulators due to the need to keep track of the ownership of use counts.
A new API call is used rather than an additional argument to the existing
regulator_get() in order to avoid merge headaches with driver code in
other trees.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Follow the approach suggested by Russell King and implemented by him in
the clkdev API and allow consumer device supply mapings to be set up
using the dev_name() for the consumer instead of the struct device.
In order to avoid making existing machines instabuggy and creating merge
issues the use of struct device is still supported for the time being.
This resolves problems working with buses such as I2C which make the
struct device available late providing that the final device name is
known, which is the case for most embedded systems with fixed setups.
Consumers must still use the struct device when calling regulator_get().
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This is useful for implementing get_status() in terms of get_mode().
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Default voltage constraints were being provided for fixed voltage
regulator where board constraints were not provided but these constraints
used INT_MIN as the default minimum voltage which is not a valid value
since it is less than zero. Use 1uV instead.
Also set the default values we set in the constraints themselves since
otherwise the max_uV constraint we determine will not be stored in the
actual constraint strucutre and will therefore not be used.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
During regulator registration, any error after device_register() will
cause a double-free on the struct regulator_dev 'rdev'. The bug is in
drivers/regulator/core.c:regulator_register():
...
scrub:
device_unregister(&rdev->dev);
clean:
kfree(rdev); <---
rdev = ERR_PTR(ret);
goto out;
...
device_unregister() calls regulator_dev_release() which frees rdev. The
subsequent kfree corrupts memory and causes some OMAP3 systems to oops on
boot in regulator_get().
Applies against 2.6.30-rc3.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
When regulator_desc->type is something different from REGULATOR_VOLTAGE or REGULATOR_CURRENT
the if should probably return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
@@ expression E; constant C; @@
(
- !E == C
+ E != C
)
Signed-off-by: Diego Liziero <diegoliz@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
I removed the extra semi-colon and indented the return statement.
The unreachable code was found by smatch (http://repo.or.cz/w/smatch.git).
The patch was compile tested.
regards,
dan carpenter
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
At present it is not possible for machine constraints to disable
regulators which have been left on when the system starts, for example
as a result of fixed default configurations in hardware. This means that
power may be wasted by these regulators if they are not in use.
Provide intial support for this with a late_initcall which will disable
any unused regulators if the machine has enabled this feature by calling
regulator_has_full_constraints(). If this has not been called then print
a warning to encourage users to fully specify their constraints so that
we can change this to be the default behaviour in future.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Don't set use_count for regulators that are enabled at boot since this
stops the supply being disabled by well-behaved consumers which do
balanced enables and disabled. Any consumers which don't do disables
which are not matched by enables are unable to share regulators - shared
regulators are the common case so the API should facilitate them.
Consumers that want to disable regulators that are enabled when they
start have two options:
- Do a regulator_enable() prior to the disable to bring the use count
in sync with the hardware state; this will ensure that if the
regulator was enabled by another driver then this consumer will play
nicely with it.
- Use regulator_force_disable(); this explicitly bypasses any checks
done by the core and documents the inability of the driver to share
the supply.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Fix some refcounting issues in the regulator framework, supporting
regulator_disable() for regulators that were enabled at boot time
via machine constraints:
- Update those regulators' usecounts after enabling, so they
can cleanly be disabled at that level.
- Remove the problematic per-consumer usecount, so there's
only one level of enable/disable.
Buggy consumers could notice different bug symptoms. The main
example would be refcounting bugs; also, any (out-of-tree) users
of the experimental regulator_set_optimum_mode() stuff which
don't call it when they're done using a regulator.
This is a net minor codeshrink.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The consumer can print a message if required, some consumers may have
optional regulators and wish to downgrade the logging for them or ignore
their absence.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Rather than incrementing the reference count for boot_on regulators
(which prevents them being disabled later on) simply force the
regulator to be enabled when applying the constraints. Previously
boot_on was essentially equivalent to always_on.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Specifying voltage constraints is optional (and only needed if the
consumer is allowed to change the voltage) so don't complain unless
a voltage has been specified.
Also avoid surprises with a dangling else while we're here.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Add a basic mechanism for regulators to report the discrete
voltages they support: list_voltage() enumerates them using
selectors numbered from 0 to an upper bound.
Use those methods to force machine-level constraints into bounds.
(Example: regulator supports 1.8V, 2.4V, 2.6V, 3.3V, and board
constraints for that rail are 2.0V to 3.6V ... so the range of
voltages is then 2.4V to 3.3V on this board.)
Export those voltages to the regulator consumer interface, so for
example regulator hooked up to an MMC/SD/SDIO slot can report the
actual voltage options available to cards connected there.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This is useful when wishing to run in a fixed operating mode that isn't
the default.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Update the documentation to suggest the use of datasheet names for
the supplies requested by regulator consumers. Doing this makes it
easier to tie the design for a given platform up with the requirements
of the driver for a consumer.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Currently regulator_unregister does not clear regulator <--> consumer
mapping.
This patch introduces unset_regulator_supplies that clear the map.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Commit 872ed3fe176833f7d43748eb88010da4bbd2f983 caused regulator drivers
to take the struct regulator_dev lock themselves which requires that the
struct be visible to them. Band aid this by making the struct visible.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Rather than having the regulator init data read from the platform_data
member of the struct device that is registered for the regulator make
the init data an explict argument passed in when registering. This
allows drivers to use the platform data for their own purposes if they
wish.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Regulator: Push lock out of _notifier_call_chain and into caller functions
(side effect of fixing deadlock in regulator_force_disable)
+ Add a voltage changed event.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Based on previous LKML discussions:
* Update docs for regulator sysfs class attributes to highlight
the fact that all current attributes are intended to be control
inputs, including notably "state" and "opmode" which previously
implied otherwise.
* Define a new regulator driver get_status() method, which is the
first method reporting regulator outputs instead of inputs.
It can report on/off and error status; or instead of simply
"on", report the actual operating mode.
For the moment, this is a sysfs-only interface, not accessible to
regulator clients. Such clients can use the current notification
interfaces to detect errors, if the regulator reports them.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Prevent registration of duplicate "struct regulator" names.
They'd be unavailable, and clearly indicate something wrong.
[Edited to remove check for NULL consumer device until we have a
solution for things like cpufreq -- broonie]
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
There are some minor textual changes in here as well, mostly to enable()
and disable() but the primary goal of these changes is to fix
misrenderings of the kerneldoc documentation for the regulator API.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This is only the documentation that the kerneldoc system warns about.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Remove kerneldoc warnings that don't relate to missing documentation,
mostly by renaming parameters in the documentation to match their
actual names.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Some of the internal structures have no kerneldoc but the ** at the start
of the comment marking them for documentation. Remove the annotation
until some is added.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Clean up the sysfs interface to regulators by only exposing the
attributes that can be properly displayed. For example: when a
particular regulator method is needed to display the value, only
create that attribute when that method exists.
This cleaned-up interface is much more comprehensible. Most
regulators only support a subset of the possible methods, so
often more than half the attributes would be meaningless. Many
"not defined" values are no longer necessary. (But handling
of out-of-range values still looks a bit iffy.)
Documentation is updated to reflect that few of the attributes
are *always* present, and to briefly explain why a regulator may
not have a given attribute.
This adds object code, about a dozen bytes more than was removed
by the preceding patch, but saves a bunch of per-regulator data
associated with the now-removed attributes. So there's a net
reduction in memory footprint.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Shrink regulator core by removing duplication in attribute printing
and probe() cleanup paths. Saves about 340 bytes (object) on ARM.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Minor bugfixes in handling of regulator modes:
- have the routine verifying regulator modes check against
the set of legal modes (!);
- have regulator_set_optimum_mode() verify the return value
of regulator_ops.get_optimum_mode(), like drms_uA_update();
- one call to regulator_ops.set_mode() treated zero as a
failure code; make this consistent with other callers.
Both regulator_set_mode() and regulator_set_optimum_mode() now
require valid_ops_mask to include REGULATOR_CHANGE_MODE; that
seems like a bugfix too.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Make the <linux/regulator.h> framework treat enable/disable call
pairs like the <linux/clk.h> and <linux/interrupt.h> frameworks do:
they're refcounted, so that different parts of a driver don't need
to put work into coordination that frameworks normally handle.
It's a minor object code shrink.
It also makes the regulator_is_disabled() kerneldoc say what it's
actually returning: return value is not a refcount, and may report
an error (e.g. I/O error from I2C).
It also fixes some minor regulator_put() goofage: removing unlocked
access to the enable state. (But still not making regulator put/get
match the refcounting pattern they invoke.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This patch is part of a larger patch series which will remove
the "char bus_id[20]" name string from struct device. The device
name is managed in the kobject anyway, and without any size
limitation, and just needlessly copied into "struct device".
To set and read the device name dev_name(dev) and dev_set_name(dev)
must be used. If your code uses static kobjects, which it shouldn't
do, "const char *init_name" can be used to statically provide the
name the registered device should have. At registration time, the
init_name field is cleared, to enforce the use of dev_name(dev) to
access the device name at a later time.
We need to get rid of all occurrences of bus_id in the entire tree
to be able to enable the new interface. Please apply this patch,
and possibly convert any remaining remaining occurrences of bus_id.
We want to submit a patch to -next, which will remove bus_id from
"struct device", to find the remaining pieces to convert, and finally
switch over to the new api, which will remove the 20 bytes array
and does no longer have a size limitation.
Thanks,
Kay
From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Subject: regulator: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name()
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-Off-By: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
