This patch removes most/all? of the "magic" numbers and unknown structure
variables inside the code and replaces them with meaningful prototypes.
(Plus a one line warning fix from Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>.)
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This patch initialize all remaining values which are necessary for
SPI firmwares.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This patch series hopefully increases p54's "longterm" stability.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The patch entitled "[PATCH] p54: Fix sparse warnings" added the __le16
variable rx_mtu to struct bootrec, but it could equally well be placed
in the struct bootrec_desc, which overlays the 'data' section of bootrec.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The command
make C=2 CF="-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__" drivers/net/wireless/p54/
generates the following warnings:
.../p54common.c:152:38: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
.../p54common.c:152:38: expected restricted __be32 const [usertype] *p
.../p54common.c:152:38: got unsigned int *<noident>
.../p54common.c:184:15: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
.../p54common.c:185:29: warning: cast to restricted __le16
.../p54common.c:309:11: warning: symbol 'p54_rf_chips' was not declared.
Should it be static?
.../p54common.c:313:5: warning: symbol 'p54_parse_eeprom' was not declared.
Should it be static?
.../p54common.c:620:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
.../p54common.c:620:43: expected unsigned long [unsigned] [usertype] len
.../p54common.c:620:43: got restricted __le16 [usertype] len
.../p54common.c:780:41: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer
.../p54common.c:781:32: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer
.../p54common.c:1250:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
.../p54common.c:1250:28: expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] filter_type
.../p54common.c:1250:28: got restricted __le16 [usertype] filter_type
.../p54common.c:1252:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
.../p54common.c:1252:28: expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] filter_type
.../p54common.c:1252:28: got restricted __le16 [usertype] filter_type
.../p54common.c:1257:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
.../p54common.c:1257:42: expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] filter_type
.../p54common.c:1257:42: got restricted __le16
.../p54common.c:1260:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
.../p54common.c:1260:42: expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] filter_type
.../p54common.c:1260:42: got restricted __le16
.../p54usb.c:228:10: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
.../p54usb.c:228:23: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
.../p54usb.c:228:7: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
.../p54usb.c:228:7: expected restricted __le32 [assigned] [usertype] chk
.../p54usb.c:228:7: got unsigned int
.../p54usb.c:221:8: warning: symbol 'p54u_lm87_chksum' was not declared.
Should it be static?
All of the above have been fixed. One question, however, remains: In struct
bootrec, the array "data" is treated in many places as native CPU order, but
it may be little-endian everywhere. As far as I can tell, this driver has only
been used with little-endian hardware.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This patch brings the 5GHz Phy in any prism54 devices (of course, only those who have one) to life.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The firmware can provide lots of useful statistics about noise floor,
mac time and lots of numbers about successful transfers and dropped
frames.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
tcpdump:
02:15:42.874518 61112184us tsft 48.0 Mb/s 2437 MHz (0x0480) antenna 1 [0x0000000e] CF +QoS Data IV
02:15:42.874557 >>>4356079526us<<< tsft 24.0 Mb/s 2437 MHz (0x0480) antenna 1 [0x0000000e] Acknowledgment
02:15:42.976844 61214513us tsft 1.0 Mb/s 2437 MHz (0x0480) antenna 0 [0x0000000e] Beacon
as one can see on the huge jump, it's very plausible that firmware does not report the
full 64-bit mac time, just the lower 32bit and some kinds of flags...
Therefore if we want a useful timestamp we have to emulate the high bits.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This patch hopefully contains all necessary changes to support
firmwares for all devices up to atleast 2.13.3.0.
(or: LowerMAC Protocol Rev: 5.5 )
And this is a big win, since:
* newer firmwares are more stable and reliable than the old ones.
* no problems anymore with packages > 1399 octets (without lowering the MTU).
* monitor mode finally works on USB for more than just a few seconds.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
p54_set_filter has a way too many unnecessary "magic" parameters and values.
This patch axes all superfluous parameters and gives most of the magic values appropriate names.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This patch adds the necessary changes to support LM87 firmwares.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This patch greatly reduces one of biggest memory waste in the driver.
The firmware headers provides the right values for extra head-/tailroom
and mtu size which are usually much lower than the old hardcoded ones.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Ever wondered why the signal was so bad with p54 compared to madwifi, or intel?
Well, if you have revision 1 rssi calibration curve points in your EEPROM, then wonder no more.
The firmware wants a extra 1 byte padding for every curve point. But someone forgot to put
them into the EEPROM's data structure...
So now, big question: what happens when we blindly "memcpy" these data points?
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
It's been a long time, but fullmac prism54 driver is still around...
I think we should rename every prism54* in order to avoid some
confusion about "what is actually what" in the future ;-).
Thanks-to: Maxi <maxi@daemonizer.de>
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Commit b19fa1f, entitled "net: Delete NETDEVICES_MULTIQUEUE kconfig
option" breaks p54pci and p54usb.
Additionally, the old logic always tx'ed cts frames (if enabled)
with a short preamble when [rate > 3]. (i.e. with any 802.11g rate).
Of course this isn't that bad, but it's still wrong!
(This patch also clarifies the meanings of some of the fields in the tx
header for the hardware. -- JWL)
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Acked-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.25.x, 2.6.26.x]
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This patch converts mac80211 and all drivers to have transmit
information and status in skb->cb rather than allocating extra
memory for it and copying all the data around. To make it fit,
a union is used where only data that is necessary for all steps
is kept outside of the union.
A number of fixes were done by Ivo, as well as the rt2x00 part
of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
