Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Johannes Berg
976bd9efda mac80211: move beacon_loss_count into ifmgd
There's little point in keeping (and even sending to userspace)
the beacon_loss_count value per station, since it can only apply
to the AP on a managed-mode connection. Move the value to ifmgd,
advertise it only in managed mode, and remove it from ethtool as
it's available through better interfaces.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2015-10-21 10:08:21 +02:00
Johannes Berg
f83f1c129a mac80211: remove sta->tx_fragments counter
This counter is unsafe with concurrent TX and is only exposed
through debugfs and ethtool. Instead of trying to fix it just
remove it for now, if it's really needed then it should be
exposed through nl80211 and in a way that drivers that do the
fragmentation in the device could support it as well.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2015-05-05 14:21:55 +02:00
Johannes Berg
319090bf6c cfg80211: remove enum station_info_flags
This is really just duplicating the list of information that's
already available in the nl80211 attribute, so remove the list.
Two small changes are needed:
 * remove STATION_INFO_ASSOC_REQ_IES complete, but the length
   (assoc_req_ies_len) can be used instead
 * add NL80211_STA_INFO_RX_DROP_MISC which exists internally
   but not in nl80211 yet

This gets rid of the duplicate maintenance of the two lists.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2015-01-08 15:28:10 +01:00
Johannes Berg
4ed20bebf5 cfg80211: remove "channel" from survey names
All of the survey data is (currently) per channel anyway,
so having the word "channel" in the name does nothing. In
the next patch I'll introduce global data to the survey,
where the word "channel" is actually confusing.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2015-01-08 15:27:52 +01:00
Johannes Berg
b7ffbd7ef6 cfg80211: make ethtool the driver's responsibility
Currently, cfg80211 tries to implement ethtool, but that doesn't
really scale well, with all the different operations. Make the
lower-level driver responsible for it, which currently only has
an effect on mac80211. It will similarly not scale well at that
level though, since mac80211 also has many drivers.

To cleanly implement this in mac80211, introduce a new file and
move some code to appropriate places.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2014-06-23 11:05:33 +02:00