Test that PERF_EVENT_IOC_MODIFY_ATTRIBUTES correctly modifies
perf_event_attr::sig_data as well.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220131103407.1971678-2-elver@google.com
The alignment of a structure is that of its largest member. On
architectures like 32-bit Arm (but not e.g. 32-bit x86) 64-bit integers
will require 64-bit alignment and not its natural word size.
This means that there is no portable way to add 64-bit integers to
siginfo_t on 32-bit architectures without breaking the ABI, because
siginfo_t does not yet (and therefore likely never will) contain 64-bit
fields on 32-bit architectures. Adding a 64-bit integer could change the
alignment of the union after the 3 initial int si_signo, si_errno,
si_code, thus introducing 4 bytes of padding shifting the entire union,
which would break the ABI.
One alternative would be to use the __packed attribute, however, it is
non-standard C. Given siginfo_t has definitions outside the Linux kernel
in various standard libraries that can be compiled with any number of
different compilers (not just those we rely on), using non-standard
attributes on siginfo_t should be avoided to ensure portability.
In the case of the si_perf field, word size is sufficient since there is
no exact requirement on size, given the data it contains is user-defined
via perf_event_attr::sig_data. On 32-bit architectures, any excess bits
of perf_event_attr::sig_data will therefore be truncated when copying
into si_perf.
Since si_perf is intended to disambiguate events (e.g. encoding relevant
information if there are more events of the same type), 32 bits should
provide enough entropy to do so on 32-bit architectures.
For 64-bit architectures, no change is intended.
Fixes: fb6cc127e0 ("signal: Introduce TRAP_PERF si_code and si_perf to siginfo")
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422191823.79012-1-elver@google.com
Add a kselftest for testing process-wide perf events with synchronous
SIGTRAP on events (using breakpoints). In particular, we want to test
that changes to the event propagate to all children, and the SIGTRAPs
are in fact synchronously sent to the thread where the event occurred.
Note: The "signal_stress" test case is also added later in the series to
perf tool's built-in tests. The test here is more elaborate in that
respect, which on one hand avoids bloating the perf tool unnecessarily,
but we also benefit from structured tests with TAP-compliant output that
the kselftest framework provides.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210408103605.1676875-8-elver@google.com
