The comment for intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler() is not consistent
with the code and the rest of the comment for this routine. This patch
fixes this typo in comment.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Amit Mehta <gmate.amit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This simplifies the code in the vlv irq handler. Also this now
means that we correctly filter underruns on gen2-4.
And as the real upshot I need to document one less function for
the fifo underrun code.
v2: Shorten one long line.
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Way too much copypasta all over. And this also clarifies a bit what's
going on since it separates the "do we have an underrun irq" from the
"should we report the underrun" check.
v2: Fix excessively long lines.
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Prep work for some nice documentation. Requires that we export the
display irq enable/disable functions on ilk/ibx. But we already export
them for vlv/i915. So not more inconsistency.
v2: Rebase on top of skl stage 1.
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
