The adev->pm.mutx is already held at the beginning of
amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks/amdgpu_dpm_enable_uvd/amdgpu_dpm_enable_vce.
But on their calling path, amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update will be
called and thus its sub functions amdgpu_dpm_get_sclk/mclk. They
will then try to acquire the same adev->pm.mutex and deadlock will
occur.
By placing amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update outside of adev->pm.mutex
protection(considering logically they do not need such protection) and
restructuring the call flow accordingly, we can eliminate the deadlock
issue. This comes with no real logics change.
Fixes: 3712e7a494 ("drm/amd/pm: unified lock protections in amdgpu_dpm.c")
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Reported-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9e689fea-6c69-f4b0-8dee-32c4cf7d8f9c@molgen.mpg.de/
BugLink: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1957
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Include the header with the prototype to silence the following clang
warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/amdgpu_dpm_internal.c:29:6: warning: no
previous prototype for function 'amdgpu_dpm_get_active_displays'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
void amdgpu_dpm_get_active_displays(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
^
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/amdgpu_dpm_internal.c:29:1: note: declare
'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this
translation unit
void amdgpu_dpm_get_active_displays(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
^
static
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/amdgpu_dpm_internal.c:76:5: warning: no
previous prototype for function 'amdgpu_dpm_get_vrefresh'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
u32 amdgpu_dpm_get_vrefresh(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
^
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/amdgpu_dpm_internal.c:76:1: note: declare
'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this
translation unit
u32 amdgpu_dpm_get_vrefresh(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
^
static
2 warnings generated.
Besides that, remove the duplicated prototype of the function
amdgpu_dpm_get_vblank_time in order to keep the consistency of the
headers.
Fixes: 6ddbd37f10 ("drm/amd/pm: optimize the amdgpu_pm_compute_clocks() implementations")
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Clean the following coccicheck warning:
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c:7035:2-4: WARNING: possible
condition with no effect (if == else).
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
On functionality unsupported, -EOPNOTSUPP will be returned. And we rely
on that to determine the fan attributes support.
Fixes: 79c65f3fcb ("drm/amd/pm: do not expose power implementation details to amdgpu_pm.c")
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
As it's impossible the thermal sensor of KV is one of them.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
As the only entry point, it's now safe and reasonable to
enforce the lock protections in amdgpu_dpm.c. And with
this, we can drop other internal used power locks.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Avoid cross callings which make lock protection enforcement
on amdgpu_dpm_force_performance_level() impossible.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of centralizing all headers in the same folder. Separate them into
different folders and place them among those source files those who really
need them.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
