This patch renames functions and local variables.
This cleanup is done to get all functions starting by stm32_fmc2_nfc
in the FMC2 raw NAND driver when all functions will start by
stm32_fmc2_ebi in the FMC2 EBI driver.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/1589284068-4079-2-git-send-email-christophe.kerello@st.com
This patch removes the constant FMC2_TIMEOUT_US.
FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS will be used each time that we need to wait (except
when the timeout value is set by the framework).
It was seen, during stress tests with the sequencer in an overloaded
system, that we could be close to 1 second, even if we never met this
value. To be safe, FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS is set to 5 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/1588756279-17289-4-git-send-email-christophe.kerello@st.com
Implement exec_op() so we can later get rid of the legacy
implementation.
It's worth noting that the new implementation assert/deassert the CE
pin on each operation, which might not be necessary. We also dropped
the extra reset done at chip selection time on DOC2001plus. If it's
needed we really should do something smarter, because having a reset
everytime we access the chip is not that great perf-wise.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200501143917.1388957-5-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Single byte accesses normally go through read_byte() but we are about
to use this function in the exec_op() implementation and thus needs to
prepare for single byte reads.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200501143917.1388957-2-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
We have a dummy block_bad() implementation returning 0. Let's set the
NAND_NO_BBM_QUIRK flag and let the core take care of that.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200511064917.6255-3-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
We have a dummy block_bad() implementation returning 0. Let's set the
NAND_NO_BBM_QUIRK flag and let the core take care of that.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200511064917.6255-2-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Some controllers with embedded ECC engines override the BBM marker with
data or ECC bytes, thus making bad block detection through bad block
marker impossible. Let's flag those chips so the core knows it shouldn't
check the BBM and consider all blocks good.
This should allow us to get rid of two implementers of the
legacy.block_bad() hook.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200511064917.6255-1-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Some controller drivers do not support executing regular
nand_read/write_page_raw() helpers. For that, we created
nand_monolithic_read/write_page_raw() alternatives. Let's now allow
the driver to overload the ECC ->read/write_page_raw() hooks when
these hooks are supported.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-14-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Some controller drivers do not support executing regular
nand_read/write_page_raw() helpers. For that, we created
nand_monolithic_read/write_page_raw() alternatives. Let's now allow
the driver to overload the ECC ->read/write_page_raw() hooks.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-13-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The current nand_read/write_page_raw() helpers are already widely used
but do not fit the purpose of "constrained" controllers which cannot,
for instance, separate command/address cycles with data cycles.
Workaround this issue by proposing alternative helpers that can be
used by these controller drivers instead.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-12-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
We already know that there are controllers not able to read the three
copies of the parameter page in one go. The workaround was to first
request the controller to assert command and address cycles on the
NAND bus to trigger a parameter page read, and then do a read
operation for each page.
But there are also controllers which are not able to split the
parameter page read between the command/address cycles and the actual
data operation.
Let's use a regular PARAMETER PAGE READ operation for the first
iteration and use eithe a CHANGE READ COLUMN or a simple DATA READ
operation for the following copies, depending on what the controller
supports. The default for non-exec-op compliant drivers remains
unchanged: use a SIMPLE READ.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-11-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
We already know that there are controllers not able to read the three
copies of the parameter page in one go. The workaround was to first
request the controller to assert command and address cycles on the
NAND bus to trigger a parameter page read, and then do a simple read
operation for each page.
But there are also controllers which are not able to split the
parameter page read between the command/address cycles and the actual
data operation.
Let's use a regular PARAMETER PAGE READ operation for the first
iteration and use either a CHANGE READ COLUMN or a simple DATA READ
operation for the following copies, depending on what the controller
supports. The default behavior for non-exec-op compliant drivers
remains the same: DATA READ.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-10-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This can be used to discriminate between two path in the parameter
page detection: use data_in cycles (like before) if supported, use the
CHANGE READ COLUMN command otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-9-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Let's use a helper to clearly check if an operation is supported or not.
Return -ENOTSUPP when ->exec_op() is not implemented as we cannot know.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The logic in nand_do_read_ops() is to use a bufpoi variable, either
set to the original buffer, or set to a bounce buffer which in the end
happens to be chip->data_buf depending on the value of the
use_bounce_buf boolean. This is not a reason to call chip->data_buf
directly when we know that we are using the bounce buffer. Let's use
bufpoi instead to be consistent.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Both in nand_do_read_ops() and nand_do_write_ops() there is a boolean
called use_bufpoi which is set to true in case of unaligned request or
when there is a need for a DMA-able buffer. It basically means "use a
bounce buffer".
Depending on the value of use_bufpoi, the bufpoi variable is always
used and will either point to the original buffer or to the nand_chip
structure "internal data buffer" (this buffer is allocated with
kmalloc() on purpose so that it will be DMA-compliant).
In all cases bufpoi is used so the boolean name is misleading. Rename
use_bufpoi to be use_bouce_buf to be more accurate.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-6-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
NAND controller drivers can set the NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER flag to a
chip 'option' field. With this flag, the core is responsible of
providing DMA-able buffers.
The current behavior is to not force the use of a bounce buffer when
the core thinks this is not needed. So in the end the name is a bit
misleading, because in theory we will always have a DMA buffer but in
practice it will not always be a bounce buffer.
Rename this flag NAND_USES_DMA to be more accurate.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Now that exec_op() is implemented we no longer need to implement the
legacy hooks.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200501090650.1138200-5-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Now that we have our own controller struct we can keep the MMIO pointer
in there and use instead of using the chip->legacy.IO_ADDR_{R,W} fields.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200501090650.1138200-3-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
The CS553x companion chip embeds 4 NAND controllers. Declare them as
NAND controllers instead of NAND chips. That's done in preparation
of the transition to exec_op().
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200501090650.1138200-2-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Before reworking a little bit the JEDEC detection code, let's
clean the coding style of an if statement to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200428094302.14624-10-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
During detection the logic on the NAND bus is:
/* Regular ONFI detection */
1/ read the three NAND parameter pages
/* Extended parameter page detection */
2/ send "read the NAND parameter page" commands without reading
actual data
3/ move the column pointer to the extended page and read it
If fact, as long as there is nothing happening on the NAND bus between
1/ and 3/, the operation 2/ is redundant so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200428094302.14624-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Before reworking a little bit the ONFI detection code, let's
clean the coding style of the if statements to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200428094302.14624-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
During ONFI detection, the CRC derived from the parameter page and the
CRC supposed to be at the end of the parameter page are compared. If
they do not match, the second then the third copies of the page are
tried.
The current implementation compares the newly derived CRC with the CRC
contained in the first page only. So if this particular CRC area has
been corrupted, then the detection will fail for a wrong reason.
Fix this issue by checking the derived CRC against the right one.
Fixes: 39138c1f4a ("mtd: rawnand: use bit-wise majority to recover the ONFI param page")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200428094302.14624-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
tR and tCCS are currently wrongly expressed in femtoseconds, while we
expect these values to be expressed in picoseconds. Set right
hardcoded values.
Fixes: 6a943386ee mtd: rawnand: add default values for dynamic timings
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200428094302.14624-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Convert the timings union into a structure containing the mode and the
actual values. The values are still a union in prevision of the
addition of the NVDDR modes.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200428094302.14624-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
There is no correction involved at this point, it is just a matter of
reading registers and checking whether bitflips have occurred or
not. Rename the function to clarify it.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200424164501.26719-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Do not call nand_release() while the MTD device has not been
registered, use nand_cleanup() instead.
Fixes: 02f26ecf8c ("mtd: nand: add reworked Marvell NAND controller driver")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200424164501.26719-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Switch from the old platform_get_resource()/devm_ioremap_resource()
couple to the newer devm_platform_ioremap_resource() helper.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200424164501.26719-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
In a previous fix, I changed the condition on which the timeout of an
IRQ is reached from:
if (!ret)
into:
if (ret && !pending)
While having a non-zero return code is usual in the Linux kernel, here
ret comes from a wait_for_completion_timeout() which returns 0 when
the waiting period is too long.
Hence, the revised condition should be:
if (!ret && !pending)
The faulty patch did not produce any error because of the !pending
condition so this change is finally purely cosmetic and does not
change the actual driver behavior.
Fixes: cafb56dd74 ("mtd: rawnand: marvell: prevent timeouts on a loaded machine")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200424164501.26719-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
When the ECC strength is too weak compared to the NAND chip
requirements, display the values so that it is clear for people how
much they are far from the requirements (and might get in troubles in
the future).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200421163906.7515-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
We are about to re-use those for the exec_op() implementation which
will not rely on au1550_hwcontrol(). Let's patch those helpers to
simply use the iomem address stored in the context.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200419193037.1544035-2-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
