We repeatedly (and more so in future) use the same looping construct
over the mocs definition table to setup the register state. Refactor the
loop construct into a reusable macro.
add/remove: 2/1 grow/shrink: 1/2 up/down: 113/-330 (-217)
Function old new delta
intel_mocs_init_engine.cold - 71 +71
offset - 28 +28
__func__ 17273 17287 +14
intel_mocs_init 143 113 -30
mocs_register.isra 91 - -91
intel_mocs_init_engine 503 294 -209
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191112223600.30993-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This reverts commit f4071997f1.
These extra EHL entries won't behave as expected without a bit more work
on the kernel side so let's drop them until that kernel work has had a
chance to land. Userspace trying to use these new entries won't get the
advantage of the new functionality these entries are meant to provide,
but at least it won't misbehave.
When we do add these back in the future, we'll probably want to
explicitly use separate tables for ICL and EHL so that userspace
software that mistakenly uses these entries (which are undefined on ICL)
sees the same behavior it sees with all the other undefined entries.
Cc: Francisco Jerez <francisco.jerez.plata@intel.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.3+
Fixes: f4071997f1 ("drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table for EHL")
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191112224757.25116-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Until Icelake, each engine had its own set of 64 MOCS registers. In
order to simplify, Tigerlake moves to only 64 Global MOCS registers,
which are no longer part of the engine context. Since these registers
are now global, they also only need to be initialized once.
>From Gen12 onwards, MOCS must specify the target cache (3:2) and LRU
management (5:4) fields and cannot be programmed to 'use the value from
Private PAT', because these fields are no longer part of the PPAT. Also
cacheability control (1:0) field has changed, 00 no longer means 'use
controls from page table', but uncacheable (UC).
v2 (Lucas):
- Move the changes to the fault registers to a separate commit - the
old ones overlap with the range used by the new global MOCS
(requested by Daniele)
v3 (Lucas):
- Clarify comment about setting the unused entries to the same value
of index 0, that is the invalid entry (requested by Daniele)
- Move changes to DONE_REG and ERROR_GEN6 to a separate commit
(requested by Daniele)
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730180407.5993-5-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
The MOCS table is published as part of bspec, and versioned. Entries
are supposed to never be modified, but new ones can be added. Adding
entries increases table version. The patch includes version 1 entries.
Two of the 3 legacy entries used for gen9 are no longer expected to work.
Although we are changing the gen11 table, those changes are supposed to
be backward compatible since we are only touching previously undefined
entries.
v2: Add the missing entries in 49-51 range and replace "HW reserved"
terminology to what it actually is: L1 is implicitly enabled
(from Daniele)
v3: Use a different table for Tiger Lake since entries 0 and 1 are not
the same (from Daniele)
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730180407.5993-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
During post-reset resume, we call intel_mocs_init_engine to reinitialise
the MOCS registers. Suprisingly, especially when enhanced by lockdep,
the acquisition of the forcewake lock around each register write takes a
substantial portion of the reset time. We don't need to use the
individual forcewake here as we can assume that the caller is holding a
blanket forcewake for the reset&resume and the resume is serialised.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190703155225.9501-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
