After applying af2788925ae0 ("drm/i915: Squelch reset messages during
selftests") out of sequence, I missed fixing up a call to i915_reset().
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <kbuild-all@01.org>
Fixes: af2788925ae0 ("drm/i915: Squelch reset messages during selftests")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170725125336.11969-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
During our selftests, we try reseting the GPU tens of thousands of
times, flooding the dmesg with our reset spam drowning out any potential
warnings. Add an option to i915_reset()/i915_reset_engine() to specify a
quiet reset for selftesting.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170721123238.16428-19-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Extract the common barrier against rogue hangchecks from disrupting our
direct testing of resets, and in the process expand the lock to include
the per-engine reset shortcuts.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170721123238.16428-17-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
If all goes well, resetting one engine should not affect the operation of
any others. So to test this, we setup a continuous stream of requests
onto to each of the "innocent" engines whilst constantly resetting our
target engine.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170721123238.16428-16-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
If we enter i915_handle_error() a second time and a global reset is
already in progress, we can simply wait for completion of the first
reset. Currently we exit early prior to the actual reset being
performed -- the worst of both worlds!
v2: Plug into the existing reset_queue, and remember that kselftests is
playing games with I915_RESET_BACKOFF to prevent hangcheck from screwing
up.
v3: Rename to i915_reset_device to fit in better with i915_reset_engine
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170620095751.13127-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we now distinguish everywhere that can call
i915_gem_retire_requests() following a successful wait_for_idle, we can
remove the duplication by moving that call into i915_gem_wait_for_idle()
itself.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170330145041.9005-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
I915_RESET_IN_PROGRESS is being used for both signaling the requirement
to i915_mutex_lock_interruptible() to avoid taking the struct_mutex and
to instruct a waiter (already holding the struct_mutex) to perform the
reset. To allow for a little more coordination, split these two meaning
into a couple of distinct flags. I915_RESET_BACKOFF tells
i915_mutex_lock_interruptible() not to acquire the mutex and
I915_RESET_HANDOFF tells the waiter to call i915_reset().
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170316171305.12972-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
