We don't need to hold struct_mutex now for retiring requests, so drop it
from i915_retire_requests() and i915_gem_wait_for_idle(), finally
removing I915_WAIT_LOCKED for good.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the
local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the
shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot
allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate
workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we
reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes
with the GPU work and with later unbind).
In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to
avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is
the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not
to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma
does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM
fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping
the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by
a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we
do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate
and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv
itself.
Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the
destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex.
A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires
decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new
i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages.
However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm
discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with
trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called!
v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The request->timeline is only valid until the request is retired (i.e.
before it is completed). Upon retiring the request, the context may be
unpinned and freed, and along with it the timeline may be freed. We
therefore need to be very careful when chasing rq->timeline that the
pointer does not disappear beneath us. The vast majority of users are in
a protected context, either during request construction or retirement,
where the timeline->mutex is held and the timeline cannot disappear. It
is those few off the beaten path (where we access a second timeline) that
need extra scrutiny -- to be added in the next patch after first adding
the warnings about dangerous access.
One complication, where we cannot use the timeline->mutex itself, is
during request submission onto hardware (under spinlocks). Here, we want
to check on the timeline to finalize the breadcrumb, and so we need to
impose a second rule to ensure that the request->timeline is indeed
valid. As we are submitting the request, it's context and timeline must
be pinned, as it will be used by the hardware. Since it is pinned, we
know the request->timeline must still be valid, and we cannot submit the
idle barrier until after we release the engine->active.lock, ergo while
submitting and holding that spinlock, a second thread cannot release the
timeline.
v2: Don't be lazy inside selftests; hold the timeline->mutex for as long
as we need it, and tidy up acquiring the timeline with a bit of
refactoring (i915_active_add_request)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190919111912.21631-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We need the rename of reservation_object to dma_resv.
The solution on this merge came from linux-next:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:48:39 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] drm: fix up fallout from "dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
index 03d90b49584a..4cd54c569911 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
@@ -43,12 +43,12 @@ static int pool_active(struct i915_active *ref)
{
struct intel_engine_pool_node *node =
container_of(ref, typeof(*node), active);
- struct reservation_object *resv = node->obj->base.resv;
+ struct dma_resv *resv = node->obj->base.resv;
int err;
- if (reservation_object_trylock(resv)) {
- reservation_object_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
- reservation_object_unlock(resv);
+ if (dma_resv_trylock(resv)) {
+ dma_resv_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
+ dma_resv_unlock(resv);
}
err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(node->obj);
which is a simplified version from a previous one which had:
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
UAPI Changes:
Cross-subsystem Changes:
Core Changes:
- dma-buf: add reservation_object_fences helper, relax
reservation_object_add_shared_fence, remove
reservation_object seq number (and then
restored)
- dma-fence: Shrinkage of the dma_fence structure,
Merge dma_fence_signal and dma_fence_signal_locked,
Store the timestamp in struct dma_fence in a union with
cb_list
Driver Changes:
- More dt-bindings YAML conversions
- More removal of drmP.h includes
- dw-hdmi: Support get_eld and various i2s improvements
- gm12u320: Few fixes
- meson: Global cleanup
- panfrost: Few refactors, Support for GPU heap allocations
- sun4i: Support for DDC enable GPIO
- New panels: TI nspire, NEC NL8048HL11, LG Philips LB035Q02,
Sharp LS037V7DW01, Sony ACX565AKM, Toppoly TD028TTEC1
Toppoly TD043MTEA1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEABYIAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCXVqvpwAKCRDj7w1vZxhR
xa3RAQDzAnt5zeesAxX4XhRJzHoCEwj2PJj9Re6xMJ9PlcfcvwD+OS+bcB6jfiXV
Ug9IBd/DqjlmD9G9MxFxfSV946rksAw=
=8uv4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'drm-misc-next-2019-08-19' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc into drm-next
drm-misc-next for 5.4:
UAPI Changes:
Cross-subsystem Changes:
Core Changes:
- dma-buf: add reservation_object_fences helper, relax
reservation_object_add_shared_fence, remove
reservation_object seq number (and then
restored)
- dma-fence: Shrinkage of the dma_fence structure,
Merge dma_fence_signal and dma_fence_signal_locked,
Store the timestamp in struct dma_fence in a union with
cb_list
Driver Changes:
- More dt-bindings YAML conversions
- More removal of drmP.h includes
- dw-hdmi: Support get_eld and various i2s improvements
- gm12u320: Few fixes
- meson: Global cleanup
- panfrost: Few refactors, Support for GPU heap allocations
- sun4i: Support for DDC enable GPIO
- New panels: TI nspire, NEC NL8048HL11, LG Philips LB035Q02,
Sharp LS037V7DW01, Sony ACX565AKM, Toppoly TD028TTEC1
Toppoly TD043MTEA1
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
[airlied: fixup dma_resv rename fallout]
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190819141923.7l2adietcr2pioct@flea
As every i915_active_request should be serialised by a dedicated lock,
i915_active consists of a tree of locks; one for each node. Markup up
the i915_active_request with what lock is supposed to be guarding it so
that we can verify that the serialised updated are indeed serialised.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816121000.8507-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Be more consistent with the naming of the other DMA-buf objects.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/323401/
As pointed out by Chris, with our current approach we are actually
limited to S16_MAX * PAGE_SIZE for our size when using the blt to clear
pages. Keeping things simple try to fix this by reducing the copy to a
sequence of S16_MAX * PAGE_SIZE blocks.
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[ickle: hide the details of the engine pool inside emit_vma]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190810092945.2762-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Currently we just pass in bcs0->engine_context so it matters not, but in
the future we may want to pass in something that is not a
kernel_context, so try to be a bit more generic.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190810091748.10972-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Everything about the file is about display, and mostly about types
related to display. Move under display/ as intel_display_types.h to
reflect the facts.
There's still plenty to clean up, but start off with moving the file
where it logically belongs and naming according to contents.
v2: fix the include guard name in the renamed file
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190806113933.11799-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
My plan for the future is to have kernel contexts not to have a GEM
context backpointer (as they will not belong to any GEM context). In a
few places, we use ce->gem_context to simply obtain the i915 backpointer,
for which we can use ce->engine->i915 instead.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730163441.16477-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Track the currently bound address space used by the HW context. Minor
conversions to use the local intel_context.vm are made, leaving behind
some more surgery required to make intel_context the primary through the
selftests.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730143209.4549-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we have already plugged the w->dma into the reservation_object, and
have set ourselves up to automatically signal the request and w->dma on
completion, we do not need to export the rq->fence directly and just use
the w->dma fence.
This avoids having to take the reservation_lock inside the worker which
cross-release lockdep would complain about. :)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190621215733.12070-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since commit 1ba627148e ("drm: Add reservation_object to
drm_gem_object"), struct drm_gem_object grew its own builtin
reservation_object rendering our own private one bloat. Remove our
redundant reservation_object and point into obj->base.resv instead.
References: 1ba627148e ("drm: Add reservation_object to drm_gem_object")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190618125858.7295-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The plan is to use the blitter engine for async object clearing when
using local memory, but before we can move the worker to get_pages() we
have to first tame some more of our struct_mutex usage. With this in
mind we should be able to upstream the object clearing as some
selftests, which should serve as a guinea pig for the ongoing locking
rework and upcoming async get_pages() framework.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190529123108.24422-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
