forked from Minki/linux
623e47fc64
5 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sergey Senozhatsky
|
e02d238c98 |
zram/zcomp: do not zero out zcomp private pages
Do not __GFP_ZERO allocated zcomp ->private pages. We keep allocated streams around and use them for read/write requests, so we supply a zeroed out ->private to compression algorithm as a scratch buffer only once -- the first time we use that stream. For the rest of IO requests served by this stream ->private usually contains some temporarily data from the previous requests. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
||
Minchan Kim
|
75d8947a36 |
zram: pass gfp from zcomp frontend to backend
Each zcomp backend uses own gfp flag but it's pointless because the context they could be called is driven by upper layer(ie, zcomp frontend). As well, zcomp frondend could call them in different context. One context(ie, zram init part) is it should be better to make sure successful allocation other context(ie, further stream allocation part for accelarating I/O speed) is just optional so let's pass gfp down from driver (ie, zcomp frontend) like normal MM convention. [sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com: add missing __vmalloc zero and highmem gfps] Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
||
Kyeongdon Kim
|
d913897aba |
zram: try vmalloc() after kmalloc()
When we're using LZ4 multi compression streams for zram swap, we found
out page allocation failure message in system running test. That was
not only once, but a few(2 - 5 times per test). Also, some failure
cases were continually occurring to try allocation order 3.
In order to make parallel compression private data, we should call
kzalloc() with order 2/3 in runtime(lzo/lz4). But if there is no order
2/3 size memory to allocate in that time, page allocation fails. This
patch makes to use vmalloc() as fallback of kmalloc(), this prevents
page alloc failure warning.
After using this, we never found warning message in running test, also
It could reduce process startup latency about 60-120ms in each case.
For reference a call trace :
Binder_1: page allocation failure: order:3, mode:0x10c0d0
CPU: 0 PID: 424 Comm: Binder_1 Tainted: GW 3.10.49-perf-g991d02b-dirty #20
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x270
show_stack+0x10/0x1c
dump_stack+0x1c/0x28
warn_alloc_failed+0xfc/0x11c
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x724/0x7f0
__get_free_pages+0x14/0x5c
kmalloc_order_trace+0x38/0xd8
zcomp_lz4_create+0x2c/0x38
zcomp_strm_alloc+0x34/0x78
zcomp_strm_multi_find+0x124/0x1ec
zcomp_strm_find+0xc/0x18
zram_bvec_rw+0x2fc/0x780
zram_make_request+0x25c/0x2d4
generic_make_request+0x80/0xbc
submit_bio+0xa4/0x15c
__swap_writepage+0x218/0x230
swap_writepage+0x3c/0x4c
shrink_page_list+0x51c/0x8d0
shrink_inactive_list+0x3f8/0x60c
shrink_lruvec+0x33c/0x4cc
shrink_zone+0x3c/0x100
try_to_free_pages+0x2b8/0x54c
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x514/0x7f0
__get_free_pages+0x14/0x5c
proc_info_read+0x50/0xe4
vfs_read+0xa0/0x12c
SyS_read+0x44/0x74
DMA: 3397*4kB (MC) 26*8kB (RC) 0*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB
0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 13796kB
[minchan@kernel.org: change vmalloc gfp and adding comment about gfp]
[sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com: tweak comments and styles]
Signed-off-by: Kyeongdon Kim <kyeongdon.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
||
|
Sergey Senozhatsky
|
3d5fe03a3e |
zram/zcomp: use GFP_NOIO to allocate streams
We can end up allocating a new compression stream with GFP_KERNEL from
within the IO path, which may result is nested (recursive) IO
operations. That can introduce problems if the IO path in question is a
reclaimer, holding some locks that will deadlock nested IOs.
Allocate streams and working memory using GFP_NOIO flag, forbidding
recursive IO and FS operations.
An example:
inconsistent {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} -> {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} usage.
git/20158 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(jbd2_handle){+.+.?.}, at: start_this_handle+0x4ca/0x555
{IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} state was registered at:
__lock_acquire+0x8da/0x117b
lock_acquire+0x10c/0x1a7
start_this_handle+0x52d/0x555
jbd2__journal_start+0xb4/0x237
__ext4_journal_start_sb+0x108/0x17e
ext4_dirty_inode+0x32/0x61
__mark_inode_dirty+0x16b/0x60c
iput+0x11e/0x274
__dentry_kill+0x148/0x1b8
shrink_dentry_list+0x274/0x44a
prune_dcache_sb+0x4a/0x55
super_cache_scan+0xfc/0x176
shrink_slab.part.14.constprop.25+0x2a2/0x4d3
shrink_zone+0x74/0x140
kswapd+0x6b7/0x930
kthread+0x107/0x10f
ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
irq event stamp: 138297
hardirqs last enabled at (138297): debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x113/0x12f
hardirqs last disabled at (138296): debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x33/0x12f
softirqs last enabled at (137818): __do_softirq+0x2d3/0x3e9
softirqs last disabled at (137813): irq_exit+0x41/0x95
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(jbd2_handle);
<Interrupt>
lock(jbd2_handle);
*** DEADLOCK ***
5 locks held by git/20158:
#0: (sb_writers#7){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81155411>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x4b
#1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#2/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81145087>] lock_rename+0xd9/0xe3
#2: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#11){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8114f8e2>] lock_two_nondirectories+0x3f/0x6b
#3: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#11/4){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8114f909>] lock_two_nondirectories+0x66/0x6b
#4: (jbd2_handle){+.+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff811e31db>] start_this_handle+0x4ca/0x555
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 20158 Comm: git Not tainted 4.1.0-rc7-next-20150615-dbg-00016-g8bdf555-dirty #211
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x4c/0x6e
mark_lock+0x384/0x56d
mark_held_locks+0x5f/0x76
lockdep_trace_alloc+0xb2/0xb5
kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x32/0x1e2
zcomp_strm_alloc+0x25/0x73 [zram]
zcomp_strm_multi_find+0xe7/0x173 [zram]
zcomp_strm_find+0xc/0xe [zram]
zram_bvec_rw+0x2ca/0x7e0 [zram]
zram_make_request+0x1fa/0x301 [zram]
generic_make_request+0x9c/0xdb
submit_bio+0xf7/0x120
ext4_io_submit+0x2e/0x43
ext4_bio_write_page+0x1b7/0x300
mpage_submit_page+0x60/0x77
mpage_map_and_submit_buffers+0x10f/0x21d
ext4_writepages+0xc8c/0xe1b
do_writepages+0x23/0x2c
__filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x84/0x8b
filemap_flush+0x1c/0x1e
ext4_alloc_da_blocks+0xb8/0x117
ext4_rename+0x132/0x6dc
? mark_held_locks+0x5f/0x76
ext4_rename2+0x29/0x2b
vfs_rename+0x540/0x636
SyS_renameat2+0x359/0x44d
SyS_rename+0x1e/0x20
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[minchan@kernel.org: add stable mark]
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Kyeongdon Kim <kyeongdon.kim@lge.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
||
|
Sergey Senozhatsky
|
6e76668e41 |
zram: add lz4 algorithm backend
Introduce LZ4 compression backend and make it available for selection.
LZ4 support is optional and requires user to set ZRAM_LZ4_COMPRESS config
option. The default compression backend is LZO.
TEST
(x86_64, core i5, 2 cores + 2 hyperthreading, zram disk size 1G,
ext4 file system, 3 compression streams)
iozone -t 3 -R -r 16K -s 60M -I +Z
Test LZO LZ4
----------------------------------------------
Initial write 1642744.62 1317005.09
Rewrite 2498980.88 1800645.16
Read 3957026.38 5877043.75
Re-read 3950997.38 5861847.00
Reverse Read 2937114.56 5047384.00
Stride read 2948163.19 4929587.38
Random read 3292692.69 4880793.62
Mixed workload 1545602.62 3502940.38
Random write 2448039.75 1758786.25
Pwrite 1670051.03 1338329.69
Pread 2530682.00 5097177.62
Fwrite 3232085.62 3275942.56
Fread 6306880.25 6645271.12
So on my system LZ4 is slower in write-only tests, while it performs
better in read-only and mixed (reads + writes) tests.
Official LZ4 benchmarks available here http://code.google.com/p/lz4/
(linux kernel uses revision r90).
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|