The function ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() takes a task struct descriptor but
uses current as the task to perform the operations on. In pretty much all
cases the task decriptor is the same as current, so this wasn't an issue.
But there is a case in the ARM architecture that passes in a task that is
not current, and expects a result from that task, and this code breaks it.
Fixes: 51584396cff5 ("arm64: Use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() instead of curr_ret_stack")
Reported-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The ret_stack should not be accessed directly via the curr_ret_stack
variable on the task_struct. This is because the ret_stack is going to be
converted into a series of longs and not an array of ret_stack structures.
The way that a ret_stack should be retrieved is via the
ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack structure, but it needs to be documented on how
to use it.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The ret_stack processing is going to change, and that is going
to break anything that is accessing the ret_stack directly. One user is the
function graph profiler. By using the ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() helper
function, the profiler can access the ret_stack entry without relying on the
implementation details of the stack itself.
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Move the function function_graph_ret_addr() to fgraph.c, as the management
of the curr_ret_stack is going to change, and all the accesses to ret_stack
needs to be done in fgraph.c.
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Currently the registering of function graph is to pass in a entry and return
function. We need to have a way to associate those functions together where
the entry can determine to run the return hook. Having a structure that
contains both functions will facilitate the process of converting the code
to be able to do such.
This is similar to the way function hooks are enabled (it passes in
ftrace_ops). Instead of passing in the functions to use, a single structure
is passed in to the registering function.
The unregister function is now passed in the fgraph_ops handle. When we
allow more than one callback to the function graph hooks, this will let the
system know which one to remove.
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To make the function graph infrastructure more managable, the code needs to
be in its own file (fgraph.c). Move the code that is specific for managing
the function graph infrastructure out of ftrace.c and into fgraph.c
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The curr_ret_stack is no longer set to a negative value when a function is
not to be traced by the function graph tracer. Remove the usage of
FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH, as it is no longer needed.
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
In order to make the function graph infrastructure more generic, there can
not be code specific for the function_graph tracer in the generic code. This
includes the set_graph_notrace logic, that stops all graph calls when a
function in the set_graph_notrace is hit.
By using the trace_recursion mask, we can use a bit in the current
task_struct to implement the notrace code, and move the logic out of
fgraph.c and into trace_functions_graph.c and keeps it affecting only the
tracer and not all call graph callbacks.
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
As the function graph infrastructure can be used by thing other than
tracing, moving the code to its own file out of the trace_functions_graph.c
code makes more sense.
The fgraph.c file will only contain the infrastructure required to hook into
functions and their return code.
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
