Add implementation for:
- pin control, group information retrieval: count, name and pins
- pin muxing:
- function information (count, name and groups)
- mux setting
- GPIO control (enable, disable, set direction)
- pin configuration:
- pull disable, up and down
- any other option is treated as not supported.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
There is nothing wrong with requesting pin that owned by ACPI.
The only difference is how interrupt status will be reflected.
It means that in ACPI mode we may not use pin as GPIO-backed IRQ.
Taking above into consideration, move the check from GPIO to IRQ chip
callback.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
There is no need to keep pointer to struct platform_device, which is container
of struct device, because the latter is what have been used everywhere outside
of ->probe() path. In any case we may derive pointer to the container when
needed.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
A pin in native mode still can be requested as GPIO, though we assume
that firmware has configured it properly, which sometimes is not the case.
Here we allow turning the pin as GPIO to avoid potential issues,
but issue warning that something might be wrong.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
The pattern
foo = kmalloc(sizeof(*foo), GFP_KERNEL);
has an advantage when foo type is changed. Since we are planning a such,
better to be prepared by using standard pattern for memory allocation.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
The Intel Lynxpoint pinctrl driver implements irqchip callbacks which are
called with desc->lock raw_spinlock held. In mainline this is fine because
spinlock resolves to raw_spinlock. However, running the same code in -rt
we will get a BUG() asserted.
This is because in -rt spinlocks are preemptible so taking the driver
private spinlock in irqchip callbacks causes might_sleep() to trigger.
In order to keep -rt happy but at the same time make sure that register
accesses get serialized, convert the driver to use raw_spinlock instead.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
There is no need to keep pointer to struct platform_device, which is container
of struct device, because the latter is what have been used everywhere outside
of ->probe() path. In any case we may derive pointer to the container when
needed.
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
It has turned out that some mmc host drivers, but perhaps also others
drivers, needs to reset the pinctrl into the default state
(PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT). However, they can't use the existing
pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(), as that requires CONFIG_PM to be set.
This leads to open coding, as they need to look up the default state
themselves and then select it.
To avoid the open coding, let's introduce pinctrl_select_default_state()
and make it available independently of CONFIG_PM. As a matter of fact, this
makes it more consistent with the behaviour of the driver core, as it
already tries to looks up the default state during probe.
Going forward, users of pinctrl_pm_select_default_state() are encouraged to
move to pinctrl_select_default_state(), so the old API can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191206170821.29711-2-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
intel-pinctrl for v5.5-2
* Fix Baytrail silicon issue by using a global lock
* Fix North community pin names that user will assume their functions
* Convert Cherryview and Baytrail to pass IRQ chip along with GPIO one
The following is an automated git shortlog grouped by driver:
baytrail:
- Pass irqchip when adding gpiochip
- Add GPIO <-> pin mapping ranges via callback
- Update North Community pin list
- Really serialize all register accesses
cherryview:
- Pass irqchip when adding gpiochip
- Add GPIO <-> pin mapping ranges via callback
- Split out irq hw-init into a separate helper function
AST2600 has two USB ports, A, B:
Port A supports 4 distinct modes:
1. PCIe EHCI to Hub
2. Hub to PHY
3. BMC EHCI to PHY
4. PCIe EHCI to PHY
Port B support 3 modes:
1. USB1.1 HID controller
2. USB2.0 Device controller
3. BMC EHCI port2
Implement pinmux support by mapping each ports' functions onto a single
pin group for each port.
Signed-off-by: Johnny Huang <johnny_huang@aspeedtech.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191202061432.3996-4-andrew@aj.id.au
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Early revisions of the AST2600 datasheet are conflicted about the state
of the LPC/eSPI strapping bit (SCU510[6]). Conversations with ASPEED
determined that the reference pinmux configuration tables were in error
and the SCU documentation contained the correct configuration. Update
the driver to reflect the state described in the SCU documentation.
Fixes: 2eda1cdec4 ("pinctrl: aspeed: Add AST2600 pinmux support")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191202050110.15340-1-andrew@aj.id.au
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The config options toggle Samsung Exynos SoCs pinctrl drivers, not the
driver data. Clarify this in the option title/name and also make it
consistent with other Samsung entries. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
The Samsung pinctrl drivers require only GPIOLIB and OF for building.
The drivers should be buildable on all architectures so enable
COMPILE_TEST.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
After commit 5ea422750a9f ("pinctrl: baytrail: Pass irqchip when
adding gpiochip") the GPIO IRQ chip structure is being initialized
under conditional when IRQ resource has been discovered. But that
commit left aside the assignment of ->init_valid_mask() callback
that is done unconditionally.
For sake of consistency and preventing some garbage in GPIO IRQ chip
structure group initialization together.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Keeping the IRQ chip definition static shares it with multiple instances
of the GPIO chip in the system. This is bad and now we get this warning
from GPIO library:
"detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver."
Hence, move the IRQ chip definition from being driver static into the struct
intel_pinctrl. So a unique IRQ chip is used for each GPIO chip instance.
Fixes: 9f573b98ca ("pinctrl: baytrail: Update irq chip operations")
Depends-on: ca8a958e2a ("pinctrl: baytrail: Pass irqchip when adding gpiochip")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
We need to convert all old gpio irqchips to pass the irqchip
setup along when adding the gpio_chip. For more info see
drivers/gpio/TODO.
For chained irqchips this is a pretty straight-forward conversion.
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
When IRQ chip is instantiated via GPIO library flow, the few functions,
in particular the ACPI event registration mechanism, on some of ACPI based
platforms expect that the pin ranges are initialized to that point.
Add GPIO <-> pin mapping ranges via callback in the GPIO library flow.
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
