Update bindings for the Dialog Semiconductor DA9121 voltage regulator to
add device variants.
Because several variants have multiple regulators, and to regard potential
to add GPIO support in future, the 'regulators' sub-node is added,
following the precedent set by other multi-regulator devices, including
the DA9211 family. This breaks compatibility with the original submission
by Vincent Whitchurch - but as this is still in for-next, the alignment
could be made before upstreaming occurs.
Signed-off-by: Adam Ward <Adam.Ward.opensource@diasemi.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0606d3ded5fef4c38760246146f197db4ce3a374.1606755367.git.Adam.Ward.opensource@diasemi.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
RFC for adding a support for typical voltage scaling connection
In few occasions there has been a need to scale the voltage output
from bucks on BD71837. Usually this is done when buck8 is used to
power specific GPU which can utilize voltages down to 0.7V. As lowest
the buck8 on BD71837 can go is 0.8V, and external connection is used to
scale the voltages.
The BD71837, BD71847 and BD71850 bucks can be adjusted by pulling up the
feedback pin using suitable voltage/resistors.
|---------------|
| buck 8 |-------+----->Vout
| | |
|---------------| |
| |
| |
+-------+--R2----+
|
R1
|
V FB-pull-up
This will scale the voltage as follows:
- Vout_o = Vo - (Vpu - Vo)*R2/R1
- Linear_step = step_orig*(R1+R2)/R1
where:
Vout_o is adjusted voltage output at vsel reg value 0
Vo is original voltage output at vsel reg value 0
Vpu is the pull-up voltage V FB-pull-up in the picture
R1 and R2 are resistor values.
>From HW point of view this does not need to be limited to buck 8. This
connection can be used to adjust output from any of the bucks on
BD71837/47/50.
As this seems to be a 'de-facto' way to scale the voltages on BD71837 it
might be a good idea to support computing the new voltage ranges for
bucks based on the V-pull-up and resistor R1/R2 values given from
device-tree. This allows describing the external HW connection using DT
to correctly scale the voltages.
This RFC uses "rohm,feedback-pull-up-r1-ohms" and
"rohm,feedback-pull-up-r2-ohms" to provide the resistor values - but
these names (without the picture) might not be too descriptive. I am
grateful for all suggestions as better and more descriptive names.
This patch series is an RFC because this connection feels somewhat
"hacky". OTOH - when hack becomes widely used, it is less of an hack and
more of a standard - and occasionally supporting HW hacks using SW may
benefit us all, right? :)
The other thing some projects do is allowing the change of BD71837 buck8
voltages when buck8 is enabled. This however will introduce voltage
spikes as buck8 was not originally designed for this. The specific HW
platform must be evaluated to be able to tolerate these spikes. Thus
this patch series does not support buck8 voltage changes when buck8 is
enabled. I wonder if this should be allowed per some config option(?) I
don't want to help people frying their boards... Opinions? Is there
suggested way of allowing this type of features at own risk? Config or
even Some #ifdef which is not listed in Kconfig? Device-tree property?
If you have (good) suggestions I could add the optional (non default)
DVS support for non DVS bucks on BD71837.
Matti Vaittinen (3):
dt-bindings: regulator: BD71837 support commonly used feedback
connection
dt-bindings: regulator: BD71847 support commonly used feedback
connection
regulator: bd718x7: Support external connection to scale voltages
.../regulator/rohm,bd71837-regulator.yaml | 48 +++++
.../regulator/rohm,bd71847-regulator.yaml | 49 ++++++
drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c | 164 +++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
base-commit: 3cea11cd5e
--
2.21.3
--
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND
~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
Simon says - in Latin please.
~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~
Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
Another round of wack-a-mole. The json-schema default is additional
unknown properties are allowed, but for DT all properties should be
defined.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
In cases where we don't reference another schema, 'additionalProperties'
can be used instead. This is preferred for now as 'unevaluatedProperties'
support isn't implemented yet.
In a few cases, this means adding some missing property definitions of
which most are for SPI bus properties. 'unevaluatedProperties' is not going
to work for the SPI bus properties anyways as they are evaluated from the
parent node, not the SPI child node.
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005183830.486085-3-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can
check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present
in schemas.
'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schema (via
'$ref') and all possible properties and/or child nodes are not
explicitly listed in the schema with the '$ref'.
This is in preparation to add a meta-schema to check for missing
'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties'. This has been a
constant source of review issues.
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005183830.486085-2-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
The PM660 and PM660L combo is found on boards featuring the
SDM630, SDM636, SDM660 (and SDA variants) and it is used to
give power to practically everything, from core to peripherals.
Document the SMD-RPM regulator entries for both.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200926125549.13191-8-kholk11@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The PM660 and PM660L combo is found on boards featuring the
SDM630, SDM636, SDM660 (and SDA variants) and it is used to
give power to practically everything, from core to peripherals.
Document the SPMI regulator bindings for both.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200926125549.13191-5-kholk11@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Initial support for ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF PMICs.
These PMICs are primarily intended to be used to power the R-Car family
processors. BD9576MUF includes some additional safety features the
BD9573MUF does not have. This initial version of drivers does not
utilize these features and for now the SW behaviour is identical.
Please note that this version of drivers is only tested on BD9576MUF
but according to the data-sheets the relevant parts of registers should
be same so drivers should also work on BD9573MUF.
This patch series includes MFD, watchdog and regulator drivers with
basic functionality such as:
- Enabling and pinging the watchdog
- configuring watchog timeout / window from device-tree
- reading regulator states/voltages
- enabling/disabling VOUT1 (VD50) when control mode B is used.
This patch series does not bring interrupt support. BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF
are designed to keep the IRQ line low for whole duration of error
condition. IRQ can't be 'acked'. So proper IRQ support would require
some IRQ limiter implementation (delayed unmask?) in order to not hog
the CPU.
---
Matti Vaittinen (6):
dt_bindings: mfd: Add ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF PMICs
dt_bindings: regulator: Add ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF PMICs
mfd: Support ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF
wdt: Support wdt on ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF
regulator: Support ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF
MAINTAINERS: Add ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF drivers
.../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd9576-pmic.yaml | 129 +++++++
.../regulator/rohm,bd9576-regulator.yaml | 33 ++
MAINTAINERS | 4 +
drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c | 130 +++++++
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 10 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c | 337 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 13 +
drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/watchdog/bd9576_wdt.c | 295 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h | 61 ++++
include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 2 +
14 files changed, 1028 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd9576-pmic.yaml
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/rohm,bd9576-regulator.yaml
create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c
create mode 100644 drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c
create mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/bd9576_wdt.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h
base-commit: f4d51dffc6
--
2.21.0
--
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND
~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
Simon says - in Latin please.
~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~
Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
The BD718(37/47/50) regulator enable states can be controlled either by SW
or by PMIC internal state machine.
On some systems mixture of SW and HW state machine controlled regulators is
needed.
Specifically, some SoCs signal SUSPEND state change to PMIC via
STBY_REQ line. Now there are setups that expect certain regulators then to
be disabled (by PMIC state machine) while other regulators should stay
enabled (regardless of HW state => SW control required).
Add a new device-tree property "rohm,no-regulator-enable-control" which can
be used to leave regulator(s) under HW state machine control.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/51022c60412297ad9b22501452d60ba2dce38d2e.1599029334.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The BD718(37/47/50) regulator enable states can be controlled either by SW
or by PMIC internal state machine.
On some systems mixture of SW and HW state machine controlled regulators is
needed.
Specifically, some SoCs signal SUSPEND state change to PMIC via
STBY_REQ line. Now there are setups that expect certain regulators then to
be disabled (by PMIC state machine) while other regulators should stay
enabled (regardless of HW state => SW control required).
Add a new device-tree property "rohm,no-regulator-enable-control" which can
be used to leave regulator(s) under HW state machine control.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9ff1104579093e7977944be769d625b9e33bc663.1599029334.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>:
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
This is to improve the mp886x regulator driver support.
patch1 implments .set_ramp_delay
patch2 and patch3 support the switch freq setting
patch4 converts dt binding to json-schema
Since v2:
- put any schema conversions at the end of the series as Mark
suggested.
Jisheng Zhang (4):
regulator: mp886x: implement set_ramp_delay
dt-bindings: regulator: mp886x: support mps,switch-frequency
regulator: mp886x: support setting switch freq
dt-bindings: regulator: Convert mp886x to json-schema
.../devicetree/bindings/regulator/mp886x.txt | 27 -----
.../bindings/regulator/mps,mp886x.yaml | 58 ++++++++++
drivers/regulator/mp886x.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mp886x.txt
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mps,mp886x.yaml
--
2.28.0.rc1
Rationale:
Reduces attack surface on kernel devs opening the links for MITM
as HTTPS traffic is much harder to manipulate.
Deterministic algorithm:
For each file:
If not .svg:
For each line:
If doesn't contain `\bxmlns\b`:
For each link, `\bhttp://[^# \t\r\n]*(?:\w|/)`:
If neither `\bgnu\.org/license`, nor `\bmozilla\.org/MPL\b`:
If both the HTTP and HTTPS versions
return 200 OK and serve the same content:
Replace HTTP with HTTPS.
Signed-off-by: Alexander A. Klimov <grandmaster@al2klimov.de>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200719200623.61524-1-grandmaster@al2klimov.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This patchset adds support for being able to change regulator modes for
the mt6397 regulator. This is needed to allow the voltage scaling
support in the MT8173 SoC to be used on the elm (Acer Chromebook R13)
and hana (several Lenovo Chromebooks) devices.
Without a of_map_mode implementation, the regulator-allowed-modes
devicetree field is skipped, and attempting to change the regulator mode
results in an error:
[ 1.439165] vpca15: mode operation not allowed
Changes in v2:
- Introduce constants in dt-bindings
- Improve conditional readability
Anand K Mistry (4):
regulator: mt6397: Move buck modes into header file
dt-bindings: regulator: mt6397: Document valid modes
regulator: mt6397: Implement of_map_mode
arm64: dts: mediatek: Update allowed mt6397 regulator modes for elm
boards
.../bindings/regulator/mt6397-regulator.txt | 3 +++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi | 4 +++-
drivers/regulator/mt6397-regulator.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
.../regulator/mediatek,mt6397-regulator.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/regulator/mediatek,mt6397-regulator.h
--
2.27.0.212.ge8ba1cc988-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.orghttp://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
This patchset adds support for being able to change regulator modes for
the da9211 regulator. This is needed to allow the voltage scaling
support in the MT8173 SoC to be used in the elm (Acer Chromebook R13)
and hana (several Lenovo Chromebooks) devices.
Anand K Mistry (4):
regulator: da9211: Move buck modes into header file
dt-bindings: regulator: da9211: Document allowed modes
regulator: da9211: Implement of_map_mode
arm64: dts: mediatek: Update allowed regulator modes for elm boards
.../devicetree/bindings/regulator/da9211.txt | 4 +++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi | 4 ++-
drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c | 30 +++++++++++++++----
.../regulator/dlg,da9211-regulator.h | 16 ++++++++++
4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/regulator/dlg,da9211-regulator.h
--
2.27.0.212.ge8ba1cc988-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.orghttp://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
