Commit Graph

25 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Heinz Mauelshagen
6e53636fe8 dm raid: add raid4/5/6 journal write-back support via journal_mode option
Commit 63c32ed4af ("dm raid: add raid4/5/6 journaling support") added
journal support to close the raid4/5/6 "write hole" -- in terms of
writethrough caching.

Introduce a "journal_mode" feature and use the new
r5c_journal_mode_set() API to add support for switching the journal
device's cache mode between write-through (the current default) and
write-back.

NOTE: If the journal device is not layered on resilent storage and it
fails, write-through mode will cause the "write hole" to reoccur.  But
if the journal fails while in write-back mode it will cause data loss
for any dirty cache entries unless resilent storage is used for the
journal.

Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2017-03-27 12:08:07 -04:00
Heinz Mauelshagen
4464e36e06 dm raid: fix table line argument order in status
Commit 3a1c1ef2f ("dm raid: enhance status interface and fixup
takeover/raid0") added new table line arguments and introduced an
ordering flaw.  The sequence of the raid10_copies and raid10_format
raid parameters got reversed which causes lvm2 userspace to fail by
falsely assuming a changed table line.

Sequence those 2 parameters as before so that old lvm2 can function
properly with new kernels by adjusting the table line output as
documented in Documentation/device-mapper/dm-raid.txt.

Also, add missing version 1.10.1 highlight to the documention.

Fixes: 3a1c1ef2f ("dm raid: enhance status interface and fixup takeover/raid0")
Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2017-03-27 11:45:26 -04:00
Masahiro Yamada
34dcaf40c1 scripts/spelling.txt: add "explictely" pattern and fix typo instances
Fix typos and add the following to the scripts/spelling.txt:

  explictely||explicitly

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481573103-11329-25-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-02-27 18:43:47 -08:00
Heinz Mauelshagen
63c32ed4af dm raid: add raid4/5/6 journaling support
Add md raid4/5/6 journaling support (upstream commit bac624f3f8 started
the implementation) which closes the write hole (i.e. non-atomic updates
to stripes) using a dedicated journal device.

Background:
raid4/5/6 stripes hold N data payloads per stripe plus one parity raid4/5
or two raid6 P/Q syndrome payloads in an in-memory stripe cache.
Parity or P/Q syndromes used to recover any data payloads in case of a disk
failure are calculated from the N data payloads and need to be updated on the
different component devices of the raid device.  Those are non-atomic,
persistent updates.  Hence a crash can cause failure to update all stripe
payloads persistently and thus cause data loss during stripe recovery.
This problem gets addressed by writing whole stripe cache entries (together with
journal metadata) to a persistent journal entry on a dedicated journal device.
Only if that journal entry is written successfully, the stripe cache entry is
updated on the component devices of the raid device (i.e. writethrough type).
In case of a crash, the entry can be recovered from the journal and be written
again thus ensuring consistent stripe payload suitable to data recovery.

Future dependencies:
once writeback caching being worked on to compensate for the throughput
implictions involved with writethrough overhead is supported with journaling
in upstream, an additional patch based on this one will support it in dm-raid.

Journal resilience related remarks:
because stripes are recovered from the journal in case of a crash, the
journal device better be resilient.  Resilience becomes mandatory with
future writeback support, because loosing the working set in the log
means data loss as oposed to writethrough, were the loss of the
journal device 'only' reintroduces the write hole.

Fix comment on data offsets in parse_dev_params() and initialize
new_data_offset as well.

Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2017-01-25 12:49:06 +01:00
Heinz Mauelshagen
c63ede3b42 dm raid: fix transient device failure processing
This fix addresses the following 3 failure scenarios:

1) If a (transiently) inaccessible metadata device is being passed into the
constructor (e.g. a device tuple '254:4 254:5'), it is processed as if
'- -' was given.  This erroneously results in a status table line containing
'- -', which mistakenly differs from what has been passed in.  As a result,
userspace libdevmapper puts the device tuple seperate from the RAID device
thus not processing the dependencies properly.

2) False health status char 'A' instead of 'D' is emitted on the status
status info line for the meta/data device tuple in this metadata device
failure case.

3) If the metadata device is accessible when passed into the constructor
but the data device (partially) isn't, that leg may be set faulty by the
raid personality on access to the (partially) unavailable leg.  Restore
tried in a second raid device resume on such failed leg (status char 'D')
fails after the (partial) leg returned.

Fixes for aforementioned failure scenarios:

- don't release passed in devices in the constructor thus allowing the
  status table line to e.g. contain '254:4 254:5' rather than '- -'

- emit device status char 'D' rather than 'A' for the device tuple
  with the failed metadata device on the status info line

- when attempting to restore faulty devices in a second resume, allow the
  device hot remove function to succeed by setting the device to not in-sync

In case userspace intentionally passes '- -' into the constructor to avoid that
device tuple (e.g. to split off a raid1 leg temporarily for later re-addition),
the status table line will correctly show '- -' and the status info line will
provide a '-' device health character for the non-defined device tuple.

Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2017-01-25 12:49:06 +01:00
Heinz Mauelshagen
58fc4fedee Documentation: dm raid: define data_offset status field
Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2016-12-08 14:13:13 -05:00
Masanari Iida
bb1423a96f dm raid: fix typos in Documentation/device-mapper/dm-raid.txt
Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2016-11-21 09:52:04 -05:00
Heinz Mauelshagen
b052b07c39 dm raid: fix activation of existing raid4/10 devices
dm-raid 1.9.0 fails to activate existing RAID4/10 devices that have the
old superblock format (which does not have takeover/reshaping support
that was added via commit 33e53f0685).

Fix validation path for old superblocks by reverting to the old raid4
layout and basing checks on mddev->new_{level,layout,...} members in
super_init_validation().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.8
Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2016-10-17 16:41:31 -04:00
Heinz Mauelshagen
d41bfed091 dm raid: update Documentation about reshaping/takeover/additonal RAID types
Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2016-06-14 18:52:12 -04:00
Heinz Mauelshagen
f15f4d7200 dm raid: document RAID 4/5/6 discard support
For RAID 4/5/6 data integrity reasons 'discard_zeroes_data' must work
properly.

Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2015-08-31 15:05:31 -04:00
Heinz Mauelshagen
0cf4503174 dm raid: add support for the MD RAID0 personality
Add dm-raid access to the MD RAID0 personality to enable single zone
striping.

The following changes enable that access:
- add type definition to raid_types array
- make bitmap creation conditonal in super_validate(), because
  bitmaps are not allowed in raid0
- set rdev->sectors to the data image size in super_validate()
  to allow the raid0 personality to calculate the MD array
  size properly
- use mdddev(un)lock() functions instead of direct mutex_(un)lock()
  (wrapped in here because it's a trivial change)
- enhance raid_status() to always report full sync for raid0
  so that userspace checks for 100% sync will succeed and allow
  for resize (and takeover/reshape once added in future paches)
- enhance raid_resume() to not load bitmap in case of raid0
- add merge function to avoid data corruption (seen with readahead)
  that resulted from bio payloads that grew too large.  This problem
  did not occur with the other raid levels because it either did not
  apply without striping (raid1) or was avoided via stripe caching.
- raise version to 1.7.0 because of the raid0 API change

Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2015-05-29 14:19:00 -04:00
Heinz Mauelshagen
0f4106b32f dm raid: fixup documentation for discard support
Remove comment above parse_raid_params() that claims
"devices_handle_discard_safely" is a table line argument when it is
actually is a module parameter.

Also, backfill dm-raid target version 1.6.0 documentation.

Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2015-05-29 14:18:59 -04:00
Jonathan Brassow
c4a3955145 MD: Remember the last sync operation that was performed
MD:  Remember the last sync operation that was performed

This patch adds a field to the mddev structure to track the last
sync operation that was performed.  This is especially useful when
it comes to what is recorded in mismatch_cnt in sysfs.  If the
last operation was "data-check", then it reports the number of
descrepancies found by the user-initiated check.  If it was a
"repair" operation, then it is reporting the number of
descrepancies repaired.  etc.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2013-06-26 12:38:24 +10:00
Jonathan Brassow
9092c02d94 DM RAID: Add ability to restore transiently failed devices on resume
DM RAID: Add ability to restore transiently failed devices on resume

This patch adds code to the resume function to check over the devices
in the RAID array.  If any are found to be marked as failed and their
superblocks can be read, an attempt is made to reintegrate them into
the array.  This allows the user to refresh the array with a simple
suspend and resume of the array - rather than having to load a
completely new table, allocate and initialize all the structures and
throw away the old instantiation.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2013-06-14 08:10:24 +10:00
Jonathan Brassow
be83651f00 DM RAID: Add message/status support for changing sync action
DM RAID:  Add message/status support for changing sync action

This patch adds a message interface to dm-raid to allow the user to more
finely control the sync actions being performed by the MD driver.  This
gives the user the ability to initiate "check" and "repair" (i.e. scrubbing).
Two additional fields have been appended to the status output to provide more
information about the type of sync action occurring and the results of those
actions, specifically: <sync_action> and <mismatch_cnt>.  These new fields
will always be populated.  This is essentially the device-mapper way of doing
what MD controls through the 'sync_action' sysfs file and shows through the
'mismatch_cnt' sysfs file.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2013-04-24 11:42:43 +10:00
Jonathan Brassow
fe5d2f4a15 DM RAID: Add support for MD's RAID10 "far" and "offset" algorithms
DM RAID:  Add support for MD's RAID10 "far" and "offset" algorithms

Until now, dm-raid.c only supported the "near" algorthm of MD's RAID10
implementation.  This patch adds support for the "far" and "offset"
algorithms, but only with the improved redundancy that is brought with
the introduction of the 'use_far_sets' bit, which shifts copied stripes
according to smaller sets vs the entire array.  That is, the 17th bit
of the 'layout' variable that defines the RAID10 implementation will
always be set.   (More information on how the 'layout' variable selects
the RAID10 algorithm can be found in the opening comments of
drivers/md/raid10.c.)

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2013-02-26 11:55:36 +11:00
Jonathan Brassow
55ebbb59c1 DM-RAID: Fix RAID10's check for sufficient redundancy
Before attempting to activate a RAID array, it is checked for sufficient
redundancy.  That is, we make sure that there are not too many failed
devices - or devices specified for rebuild - to undermine our ability to
activate the array.  The current code performs this check twice - once to
ensure there were not too many devices specified for rebuild by the user
('validate_rebuild_devices') and again after possibly experiencing a failure
to read the superblock ('analyse_superblocks').  Neither of these checks are
sufficient.  The first check is done properly but with insufficient
information about the possible failure state of the devices to make a good
determination if the array can be activated.  The second check is simply
done wrong in the case of RAID10 because it doesn't account for the
independence of the stripes (i.e. mirror sets).  The solution is to use the
properly written check ('validate_rebuild_devices'), but perform the check
after the superblocks have been read and we know which devices have failed.
This gives us one check instead of two and performs it in a location where
it can be done right.

Only RAID10 was affected and it was affected in the following ways:
- the code did not properly catch the condition where a user specified
  a device for rebuild that already had a failed device in the same mirror
  set.  (This condition would, however, be caught at a deeper level in MD.)
- the code triggers a false positive and denies activation when devices in
  independent mirror sets have failed - counting the failures as though they
  were all in the same set.

The most likely place this error was introduced (or this patch should have
been included) is in commit 4ec1e369 - first introduced in v3.7-rc1.
Consequently this fix should also go in v3.7.y, however there is a
small conflict on the .version in raid_target, so I'll submit a
separate patch to -stable.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2013-01-24 12:02:36 +11:00
Jonathan Brassow
4ec1e369af DM RAID: Add rebuild capability for RAID10
DM RAID:  Add code to validate replacement slots for RAID10 arrays

RAID10 can handle 'copies - 1' failures for each mirror group.  This code
ensures the user has provided a valid array - one whose devices specified for
rebuild do not exceed the amount of redundancy available.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:40:24 +11:00
Jonathan Brassow
63f33b8dda DM RAID: Add support for MD RAID10
Support the MD RAID10 personality through dm-raid.c

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-08-01 20:41:20 +10:00
Masanari Iida
40e47125e6 Documentation: Fix multiple typo in Documentation
Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2012-03-07 16:08:24 +01:00
Jonathan Brassow
b12d437b73 dm raid: support metadata devices
Add the ability to parse and use metadata devices to dm-raid.  Although
not strictly required, without the metadata devices, many features of
RAID are unavailable.  They are used to store a superblock and bitmap.

The role, or position in the array, of each device must be recorded in
its superblock.  This is to help with fault handling, array reshaping,
and sanity checks.  RAID 4/5/6 devices must be loaded in a specific order:
in this way, the 'array_position' field helps validate the correctness
of the mapping when it is loaded.  It can be used during reshaping to
identify which devices are added/removed.  Fault handling is impossible
without this field.  For example, when a device fails it is recorded in
the superblock.  If this is a RAID1 device and the offending device is
removed from the array, there must be a way during subsequent array
assembly to determine that the failed device was the one removed.  This
is done by correlating the 'array_position' field and the bit-field
variable 'failed_devices'.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
2011-08-02 12:32:07 +01:00
Jonathan Brassow
46bed2b5c1 dm raid: add write_mostly parameter
Add the write_mostly parameter to RAID1 dm-raid tables.

This allows the user to set the WriteMostly flag on a RAID1 device that
should normally be avoided for read I/O.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
2011-08-02 12:32:07 +01:00
Jonathan Brassow
c1084561bb dm raid: add region_size parameter
Allow the user to specify the region_size.

Ensures that the supplied value meets md's constraints, viz. the number of
regions does not exceed 2^21.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
2011-08-02 12:32:07 +01:00
Jonathan Brassow
c0a2fa1ef1 dm raid: improve table parameters documentation
Add more information about some dm-raid table parameters and clarify how
parameters are printed when 'dmsetup table' is issued.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
2011-08-02 12:32:06 +01:00
NeilBrown
9d09e663d5 dm: raid456 basic support
This patch is the skeleton for the DM target that will be
the bridge from DM to MD (initially RAID456 and later RAID1).  It
provides a way to use device-mapper interfaces to the MD RAID456
drivers.

As with all device-mapper targets, the nominal public interfaces are the
constructor (CTR) tables and the status outputs (both STATUSTYPE_INFO
and STATUSTYPE_TABLE).  The CTR table looks like the following:

1: <s> <l> raid \
2:	<raid_type> <#raid_params> <raid_params> \
3:	<#raid_devs> <meta_dev1> <dev1> .. <meta_devN> <devN>

Line 1 contains the standard first three arguments to any device-mapper
target - the start, length, and target type fields.  The target type in
this case is "raid".

Line 2 contains the arguments that define the particular raid
type/personality/level, the required arguments for that raid type, and
any optional arguments.  Possible raid types include: raid4, raid5_la,
raid5_ls, raid5_rs, raid6_zr, raid6_nr, and raid6_nc.  (again, raid1 is
planned for the future.)  The list of required and optional parameters
is the same for all the current raid types.  The required parameters are
positional, while the optional parameters are given as key/value pairs.
The possible parameters are as follows:
 <chunk_size>		Chunk size in sectors.
 [[no]sync]		Force/Prevent RAID initialization
 [rebuild <idx>]	Rebuild the drive indicated by the index
 [daemon_sleep <ms>]	Time between bitmap daemon work to clear bits
 [min_recovery_rate <kB/sec/disk>]	Throttle RAID initialization
 [max_recovery_rate <kB/sec/disk>]	Throttle RAID initialization
 [max_write_behind <value>]		See '-write-behind=' (man mdadm)
 [stripe_cache <sectors>]		Stripe cache size for higher RAIDs

Line 3 contains the list of devices that compose the array in
metadata/data device pairs.  If the metadata is stored separately, a '-'
is given for the metadata device position.  If a drive has failed or is
missing at creation time, a '-' can be given for both the metadata and
data drives for a given position.

Examples:
# RAID4 - 4 data drives, 1 parity
# No metadata devices specified to hold superblock/bitmap info
# Chunk size of 1MiB
# (Lines separated for easy reading)
0 1960893648 raid \
	raid4 1 2048 \
	5 - 8:17 - 8:33 - 8:49 - 8:65 - 8:81

# RAID4 - 4 data drives, 1 parity (no metadata devices)
# Chunk size of 1MiB, force RAID initialization,
#	min recovery rate at 20 kiB/sec/disk
0 1960893648 raid \
        raid4 4 2048 min_recovery_rate 20 sync\
        5 - 8:17 - 8:33 - 8:49 - 8:65 - 8:81

Performing a 'dmsetup table' should display the CTR table used to
construct the mapping (with possible reordering of optional
parameters).

Performing a 'dmsetup status' will yield information on the state and
health of the array.  The output is as follows:
1: <s> <l> raid \
2:	<raid_type> <#devices> <1 health char for each dev> <resync_ratio>

Line 1 is standard DM output.  Line 2 is best shown by example:
	0 1960893648 raid raid4 5 AAAAA 2/490221568
Here we can see the RAID type is raid4, there are 5 devices - all of
which are 'A'live, and the array is 2/490221568 complete with recovery.

Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
2011-01-13 20:00:02 +00:00