This one must have missed the conversion "c003ab1b [media] rc-core:
add separate defines for protocol bitmaps and numbers".
Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c:91:6: warning: "ret" may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c:70:6: note: "ret" was declared here
This is real, if a remote control has an empty initialization sequence
we would get success or failure randomly.
OTOH the initialization of ret in m920x_init is needless, the function
returns with an error as soon as an error happens, so the last return
can only be a success and we can hard-code 0 there.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Since commit 7543f344e9 ("[media] m920x:
factor out a m920x_write_seq() function") building m920x.o triggers this
GCC warning:
drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c: In function ‘m920x_probe’:
drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c:91:6: warning: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
This warning is caused by m920x_write_seq(), which is apparently inlined
into m920x_probe(). It is clear why GCC thinks 'ret' may be used
uninitialized. But in practice the first seq->address will always be
non-zero when this function is called. That means we can change the
while()-do{} loop into a do{}-while() loop. And that suffices to make
GCC see that 'ret' will not be used uninitialized.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Add an m920x_rc_core_query() function for drivers which want to use the
linux RC core infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Parsing the RC press state is invariant wrt. the keycode, take it out of
the keycode scanning loop.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This is in preparation to using RC core infrastructure for some devices,
the RC button state parsing logic can be shared berween rc.legacy and
rc.core callbacks as it is independent from the mechanism used for RC
handling.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This is in preparation for the vp7049 frontend attach function which is
going to set a sequence of registers as well.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
