All other add functions for lists have the new item as first argument
and the position where it is added as second argument. This was changed
for no good reason in this function and makes using it unnecessary
confusing.
The name was changed to hlist_add_behind() to cause unconverted code to
generate a compile error instead of using the wrong parameter order.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Ken Helias <kenhelias@firemail.de>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> [intel driver bits]
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Bitwise AND was intended here obviously.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fixes all sparse warnings "Using plain integer as NULL pointer"
in drivers/staging/lustre
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c:1665:32: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c:1773:35: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_request.c:171:17: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c:155:30: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c:846:11: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_obd.c:902:48: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_obd.c:946:54: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_obd.c:2819:46: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_dev.c:456:66: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:2426:46: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:2569:46: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:2740:46: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:175:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:176:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:177:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:178:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:179:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:180:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:181:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:182:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:183:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:185:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:186:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:193:66: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:194:63: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:195:56: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:196:51: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:197:50: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:198:48: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:199:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:200:11: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:206:48: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c:207:11: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mgc/mgc_request.c:199:9: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c:331:11: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_config.c:1164:53: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_config.c:1306:71: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/llog_test.c:943:62: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/llog_test.c:944:65: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdecho/echo_client.c:3116:46: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_request.c:3424:46: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_request.c:3548:46: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_request.c:3615:46: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Radek Dostal <rd@radekdostal.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Add the const modifier to the file_operations struct, since it is
normally const.
Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jyu@cowsay.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove unnecessary parens from return statements, return is not a function
Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jyu@cowsay.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove extraneous space after open paren and before close paren.
Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jyu@cowsay.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch fixes the warning generated by sparse: "Using plain integer as NULL pointer" by replacing the offending 0s with NULL.
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_obd.c:902:48: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_obd.c:946:54: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_obd.c:2819:46: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Marc Fite <marc@fite.cat>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
lprocfs_wr_atomic is defined in
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c with its second argument
with the __user attribute:
int lprocfs_wr_atomic(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
unsigned long count, void *data)
but its declaration in drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h does
not include the attribute. Make declaration and definition match.
Signed-off-by: L. Alberto Giménez <agimenez@sysvalve.es>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Declare several functions and variables as static in order
to address the following sparse warnings
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/acceptor.c:49:3: warning: symbol 'lnet_acceptor_state' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/acceptor.c:79:1: warning: symbol 'lnet_acceptor_get_tunables' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/acceptor.c:211:1: warning: symbol 'lnet_accept' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/acceptor.c:333:1: warning: symbol 'lnet_acceptor' was not declared. Should it be static?
Tested by compilation only.
Signed-off-by: Matt Kurz <matt@ninezulu.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
sparse reported that gfp_mask was of the wrong type to store gfp flags. The
variable is not used so it can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org>
Suggested-by: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix the following checkpatch.pl issue in lov_request.c:
ERROR: space required before the open brace '{'
Signed-off-by: Riccardo Lucchese <riccardo.lucchese@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix the following checkpatch.pl issue in lov_request.c:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
Signed-off-by: Riccardo Lucchese <riccardo.lucchese@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Make the code clearer by introducing a local variable and removing the
unnecessary 'if' statement.
Signed-off-by: Riccardo Lucchese <riccardo.lucchese@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
current->parent is used by ptrace to redirect some signal delivery
to the ptracer. It should only be used by 'ptrace' or 'signal' code.
All other users should use current->real_parent, which is the real
parent.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch fixes the following warnings found when running sparse:
.../lproc_echo.c:43:11: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
.../lproc_echo.c:49:11: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Josep Puigdemont <josep.puigdemont@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Some of architectures have already defined 'die' as macro, so can not
use it as declaration or definition in other modules, or it will cause
compiling issue.
So use more precise name 'force_die' (like 'wrap_bulk') instead of. And
the related error (with allmodconfig under score):
CC [M] drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire':
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:309:13: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
ctx->cc_ops->die(ctx, 0);
^
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'ctx_refresh_timeout':
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:594:26: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
^
make[5]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o] Error 1
make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc] Error 2
make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre] Error 2
make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ll_proc_dointvec and ll_proc_dolongvec didn't do anything except confuse
things due to a lack of a filep variable in the functions they were used
in. So remove them and just call the real proc functions. This enabled
the code to be unwound a bit and a few "empty" proc handlers were
removed and just passed directly to procfs instead.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
It's not being used at all, so delete it.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Don't rely on a "custom" LPROCFS define, it's not needed, just check for
the real thing. This will let us delete a whole .h file that is not
being used for anything other than one #define.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
It's 'struct inode' so just use that.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Come on, is it so hard to type "GFP_ATOMIC"? Look, it's less
characters!!!
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
It's empty, so remove it and move the #include lines into the one file
that used to include this header.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Just use the proper modifier type...
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Just use the proper modifier type...
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Just use the proper modifier type...
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Just use the proper modifier type...
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
They are variable modifiers, come on, no need for a special define just
for them...
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Just use the proper string for the variable type.
Also remove some variable types that are not used at all (LPO64 and
LPPID)
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
It's empty now, move the #include lines it was pulling in, into libcfs.h
and sort them to remove the duplicates.
Odds are they all aren't needed, but let's not break the build by
experimenting with removing them at this point in time.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This removes the DECLARE_PROC_HANDLER macro, and makes proc_call_handler
a static function (horrible name to be in a module). This makes the
linux-prim.h file empty now, so it can be removed soon.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
It's a closed mailing list, what's the use of cc:ing patches there if
they never go through. So remove it from the TODO file.
A real MAINTAINERS entry is probably a good thing for the Lustre code,
maybe someday someone will send a patch to do that...
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Spell out what is happening with the proc file functions, it helps to
unwind the call chain mess here.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
It looks like someone ment for it to return this value (there's a cast),
but the funtion says 'long' which causes problems when comparing values
from this function.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Just use 'long' as that is what it was defined as.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Just use unsigned long everywhere, like the rest of the kernel does.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
No one was using them, so delete them.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Use 'struct timespec' like the rest of the kernel does
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There were just a few macros being used, remove them and have the places
where they were being used to make the proper kernel api call instead.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Some macros are never used, so remove them.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Forgot to test with infiniband enabled.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Use 'struct socket' like the rest of the kernel does.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
No need for these, just use the "real" struct the kernel provides.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
