esp_output_tail() and esp6_output_tail() can return negative
and positive error values. We currently treat only negative
values as errors, fix this to treat both cases as error.
Fixes: fca11ebde3 ("esp4: Reorganize esp_output")
Fixes: 383d0350f2 ("esp6: Reorganize esp_output")
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
IP6CB(skb)->nhoff is the offset of the nexthdr field in an IPv6
header, unless there are extension headers present, in which case
nhoff points to the nexthdr field of the last extension header.
In non-GRO code path, nhoff is set by ipv6_rcv before any XFRM code
is executed. Conversely, in GRO code path (when esp6_offload is loaded),
nhoff is not set. The following functions fail to read the correct value
and eventually the packet is dropped:
xfrm6_transport_finish
xfrm6_tunnel_input
xfrm6_rcv_tnl
Set nhoff to the proper offset of nexthdr in esp6_gro_receive.
Fixes: 7785bba299 ("esp: Add a software GRO codepath")
Signed-off-by: Yossi Kuperman <yossiku@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
If esp*_offload module is loaded, outbound packets take the
GSO code path, being encapsulated at layer 3, but encrypted
in layer 2. validate_xmit_xfrm calls esp*_xmit for that.
esp*_xmit was wrongfully detecting these packets as going
through hardware crypto offload, while in fact they should
be encrypted in software, causing plaintext leakage to
the network, and also dropping at the receiver side.
Perform the encryption in esp*_xmit, if the SA doesn't have
a hardware offload_handle.
Also, align esp6 code to esp4 logic.
Fixes: fca11ebde3 ("esp4: Reorganize esp_output")
Fixes: 383d0350f2 ("esp6: Reorganize esp_output")
Signed-off-by: Ilan Tayari <ilant@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
The check for xo being null is incorrect, currently it is checking
for non-null, it should be checking for null.
Detected with CoverityScan, CID#1429349 ("Dereference after null check")
Fixes: 7862b4058b ("esp: Add gso handlers for esp4 and esp6")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
On IPsec hardware offloading, we already get a secpath with
valid state attached when the packet enters the GRO handlers.
So check for hardware offload and skip the state lookup in this
case.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
This patch extends the xfrm_type by an encap function pointer
and implements esp4_gso_encap and esp6_gso_encap. These functions
doing the basic esp encapsulation for a GSO packet. In case the
GSO packet needs to be segmented in software, we add gso_segment
functions. This codepath is going to be used on esp hardware
offloads.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
We need a fallback for ESP at layer 2, so split esp6_output
into generic functions that can be used at layer 3 and layer 2
and use them in esp_output. We also add esp6_xmit which is
used for the layer 2 fallback.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
This patch adds GRO ifrastructure and callbacks for ESP on
ipv4 and ipv6.
In case the GRO layer detects an ESP packet, the
esp{4,6}_gro_receive() function does a xfrm state lookup
and calls the xfrm input layer if it finds a matching state.
The packet will be decapsulated and reinjected it into layer 2.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
