The tests would break without this patch, because at one point it calls
getsockopt(fd, SOL_TCP, TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE, &buf, &optlen)
This getsockopt receives the kernel-set -EINVAL. Prior to this patch
series, the eBPF getsockopt hook's -EPERM would override kernel's
-EINVAL, however, after this patch series, return 0's automatic
-EPERM will not; the eBPF prog has to explicitly bpf_set_retval(-EPERM)
if that is wanted.
I also removed the explicit mentions of EPERM in the comments in the
prog.
Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4f20b77cb46812dbc2bdcd7e3fa87c7573bde55e.1639619851.git.zhuyifei@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The tests checks how different ways of interacting with the helpers
(getting retval, setting EUNATCH, EISCONN, and legacy reject
returning 0 without setting retval), produce different results in
both the setsockopt syscall and the retval returned by the helper.
A few more tests verify the interaction between the retval of the
helper and the retval in getsockopt context.
Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/43ec60d679ae3f4f6fd2460559c28b63cb93cd12.1639619851.git.zhuyifei@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add two tests, one which asserts that ring buffer memory can be passed to
other helpers for populating its entry area, and another one where verifier
rejects different type of memory passed to bpf_ringbuf_submit().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Assert that the verifier is rejecting invalid offsets on the ringbuf entries:
# ./test_verifier | grep ring
#947/u ringbuf: invalid reservation offset 1 OK
#947/p ringbuf: invalid reservation offset 1 OK
#948/u ringbuf: invalid reservation offset 2 OK
#948/p ringbuf: invalid reservation offset 2 OK
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch adds a test for the batching and bpf_(get|set)sockopt in bpf
unix iter.
It does the following.
1. Creates an abstract UNIX domain socket
2. Call bpf_setsockopt()
3. Call bpf_getsockopt() and save the value
4. Call setsockopt()
5. Call getsockopt() and save the value
6. Compare the saved values
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220113002849.4384-5-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This allows us to add tests (esp. negative tests) where we only want to
ensure the program doesn't pass through the verifier, and also verify
the error. The next commit will add the tests making use of this.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-9-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Completely remove the old code for check_kfunc_call to help it work
with modules, and also the callback itself.
The previous commit adds infrastructure to register all sets and put
them in vmlinux or module BTF, and concatenates all related sets
organized by the hook and the type. Once populated, these sets remain
immutable for the lifetime of the struct btf.
Also, since we don't need the 'owner' module anywhere when doing
check_kfunc_call, drop the 'btf_modp' module parameter from
find_kfunc_desc_btf.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2022-01-06
We've added 41 non-merge commits during the last 2 day(s) which contain
a total of 36 files changed, 1214 insertions(+), 368 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Various fixes in the verifier, from Kris and Daniel.
2) Fixes in sockmap, from John.
3) bpf_getsockopt fix, from Kuniyuki.
4) INET_POST_BIND fix, from Menglong.
5) arm64 JIT fix for bpf pseudo funcs, from Hou.
6) BPF ISA doc improvements, from Christoph.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (41 commits)
bpf: selftests: Add bind retry for post_bind{4, 6}
bpf: selftests: Use C99 initializers in test_sock.c
net: bpf: Handle return value of BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET{4,6}_POST_BIND()
bpf/selftests: Test bpf_d_path on rdonly_mem.
libbpf: Add documentation for bpf_map batch operations
selftests/bpf: Don't rely on preserving volatile in PT_REGS macros in loop3
xdp: Add xdp_do_redirect_frame() for pre-computed xdp_frames
xdp: Move conversion to xdp_frame out of map functions
page_pool: Store the XDP mem id
page_pool: Add callback to init pages when they are allocated
xdp: Allow registering memory model without rxq reference
samples/bpf: xdpsock: Add timestamp for Tx-only operation
samples/bpf: xdpsock: Add time-out for cleaning Tx
samples/bpf: xdpsock: Add sched policy and priority support
samples/bpf: xdpsock: Add cyclic TX operation capability
samples/bpf: xdpsock: Add clockid selection support
samples/bpf: xdpsock: Add Dest and Src MAC setting for Tx-only operation
samples/bpf: xdpsock: Add VLAN support for Tx-only operation
libbpf 1.0: Deprecate bpf_object__find_map_by_offset() API
libbpf 1.0: Deprecate bpf_map__is_offload_neutral()
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220107013626.53943-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
PT_REGS*() macro on some architectures force-cast struct pt_regs to
other types (user_pt_regs, etc) and might drop volatile modifiers, if any.
Volatile isn't really required as pt_regs value isn't supposed to change
during the BPF program run, so this is correct behavior.
But progs/loop3.c relies on that volatile modifier to ensure that loop
is preserved. Fix loop3.c by declaring i and sum variables as volatile
instead. It preserves the loop and makes the test pass on all
architectures (including s390x which is currently broken).
Fixes: 3cc31d7940 ("libbpf: Normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220106205156.955373-1-andrii@kernel.org
Add a new test case with mem_or_null typed register with off > 0 to ensure
it gets rejected by the verifier:
# ./test_verifier 1011
#1009/u check with invalid reg offset 0 OK
#1009/p check with invalid reg offset 0 OK
Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The tc_redirect umounts /sys in the new namespace, which can be
mounted as shared and cause global umount. The lazy umount also
takes down mounted trees under /sys like debugfs, which won't be
available after sysfs mounts again and could cause fails in other
tests.
# cat /proc/self/mountinfo | grep debugfs
34 23 0:7 / /sys/kernel/debug rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime shared:14 - debugfs debugfs rw
# cat /proc/self/mountinfo | grep sysfs
23 86 0:22 / /sys rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime shared:2 - sysfs sysfs rw
# mount | grep debugfs
debugfs on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
# ./test_progs -t tc_redirect
#164 tc_redirect:OK
Summary: 1/4 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
# mount | grep debugfs
# cat /proc/self/mountinfo | grep debugfs
# cat /proc/self/mountinfo | grep sysfs
25 86 0:22 / /sys rw,relatime shared:2 - sysfs sysfs rw
Making the sysfs private under the new namespace so the umount won't
trigger the global sysfs umount.
Reported-by: Hangbin Liu <haliu@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Jussi Maki <joamaki@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220104121030.138216-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-12-30
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 72 non-merge commits during the last 20 day(s) which contain
a total of 223 files changed, 3510 insertions(+), 1591 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Automatic setrlimit in libbpf when bpf is memcg's in the kernel, from Andrii.
2) Beautify and de-verbose verifier logs, from Christy.
3) Composable verifier types, from Hao.
4) bpf_strncmp helper, from Hou.
5) bpf.h header dependency cleanup, from Jakub.
6) get_func_[arg|ret|arg_cnt] helpers, from Jiri.
7) Sleepable local storage, from KP.
8) Extend kfunc with PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_MEM argument support, from Kumar.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add selftests for prog/map/prog+helper feature probing APIs. Prog and
map selftests are designed in such a way that they will always test all
the possible prog/map types, based on running kernel's vmlinux BTF enum
definition. This way we'll always be sure that when adding new BPF
program types or map types, libbpf will be always updated accordingly to
be able to feature-detect them.
BPF prog_helper selftest will have to be manually extended with
interesting and important prog+helper combinations, it's easy, but can't
be completely automated.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217171202.3352835-3-andrii@kernel.org
The libbpf CI reported occasional failure in btf_skc_cls_ingress:
test_syncookie:FAIL:Unexpected syncookie states gen_cookie:80326634 recv_cookie:0
bpf prog error at line 97
"error at line 97" means the bpf prog cannot find the listening socket
when the final ack is received. It then skipped processing
the syncookie in the final ack which then led to "recv_cookie:0".
The problem is the userspace program did not do accept() and went
ahead to close(listen_fd) before the kernel (and the bpf prog) had
a chance to process the final ack.
The fix is to add accept() call so that the userspace will wait for
the kernel to finish processing the final ack first before close()-ing
everything.
Fixes: 9a856cae22 ("bpf: selftest: Add test_btf_skc_cls_ingress")
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216191630.466151-1-kafai@fb.com
Add a function to bpf_testmod that returns invalid kernel and user addresses.
Then attach an fexit program to that function that tries to read
memory through these addresses.
This logic checks that bpf_probe_read_kernel and BPF_PROBE_MEM logic is sane.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Fix up unprivileged test case results for 'Dest pointer in r0' verifier tests
given they now need to reject R0 containing a pointer value, and add a couple
of new related ones with 32bit cmpxchg as well.
root@foo:~/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf# ./test_verifier
#0/u invalid and of negative number OK
#0/p invalid and of negative number OK
[...]
#1268/p XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 1 OK
#1269/p XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 2 OK
#1270/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', good access OK
#1271/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 1 OK
#1272/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 2 OK
Summary: 1900 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Test whether unprivileged would be able to leak the spilled pointer either
by exporting the returned value from the atomic{32,64} operation or by reading
and exporting the value from the stack after the atomic operation took place.
Note that for unprivileged, the below atomic cmpxchg test case named "Dest
pointer in r0 - succeed" is failing. The reason is that in the dst memory
location (r10 -8) there is the spilled register r10:
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (bf) r0 = r10
1: R0_w=fp0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
1: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r0
2: R0_w=fp0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8_w=fp
2: (b7) r1 = 0
3: R0_w=fp0 R1_w=invP0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=fp
3: (db) r0 = atomic64_cmpxchg((u64 *)(r10 -8), r0, r1)
4: R0_w=fp0 R1_w=invP0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
4: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r0 -8)
5: R0_w=fp0 R1_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
5: (b7) r0 = 0
6: R0_w=invP0 R1_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
6: (95) exit
However, allowing this case for unprivileged is a bit useless given an
update with a new pointer will fail anyway:
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (bf) r0 = r10
1: R0_w=fp0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
1: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r0
2: R0_w=fp0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8_w=fp
2: (db) r0 = atomic64_cmpxchg((u64 *)(r10 -8), r0, r10)
R10 leaks addr into mem
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The commit referenced below added fixup_map_timer support (to create a
BPF map containing timers), but failed to increase the size of the
map_fds array, leading to out of bounds write. Fix this by changing
MAX_NR_MAPS to 22.
Fixes: e60e6962c5 ("selftests/bpf: Add tests for restricted helpers")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211214014800.78762-1-memxor@gmail.com
Since commit ad9a7f9644 ("libbpf: Improve logging around BPF program
loading"), libbpf_debug_print() gets an additional prog_name parameter
but doesn't pass it to printf(). Since the format string now expects two
arguments, printf() may read uninitialized data and segfault. Pass
prog_name through.
Fixes: ad9a7f9644 ("libbpf: Improve logging around BPF program loading")
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211213183058.346066-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org
